Erin A Bohula1, Robert P Giugliano2, Christopher P Cannon2, Jing Zhou2, Sabina A Murphy2, Jennifer A White2, Andrew M Tershakovec2, Michael A Blazing2, Eugene Braunwald2. 1. From TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.B., R.P.G., C.P.C., J.Z., S.A.M., E.B.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (J.W., M.A.B.); and Merck, Kenilworth, NJ (A.M.T.). ebohula@partners.org. 2. From TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (E.A.B., R.P.G., C.P.C., J.Z., S.A.M., E.B.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (J.W., M.A.B.); and Merck, Kenilworth, NJ (A.M.T.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Statins lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); addition of ezetimibe to statins further reduces LDL-C and hs-CRP. An analysis of the relationship between achieved LDL-C and hs-CRP targets and outcomes for simvastatin and ezetimibe/simvastatin was prespecified in Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT). METHODS AND RESULTS: The IMPROVE-IT trial randomly assigned 18 144 patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome tosimvastatin or ezetimibe/simvastatin. LDL-C and hs-CRP were measured at baseline and 1 month after randomization. Outcomes were assessed in those achieving one or both of the prespecified targets of LDL-C<70 mg/dL and hs-CRP<2 mg/L versus achieving neither target, adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. An exploratory analysis examined targets of LDL-C<50 mg/dL and hs-CRP<1 mg/L. Patients meeting both targets at baseline, with no 1-month values, or with end points before 1 month were excluded. Of 15 179 patients, 39% achieved the dual LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) and hs-CRP (<2 mg/L) targets at 1 month, 14% met neither target, 14% met only the hs-CRP target, and 33% met only the LDL-C target. Those achieving dual targets had lower primary end point rates than those meeting neither target (cardiovascular death, major coronary event, or stroke; 38.9% versus 28.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 0.66-0.81; P<0.001). More patients treated with ezetimibe/simvastatin met dual targets than those treated with simvastatin alone (50% versus 29%, P<0.001). The association of dual-target attainment with improved outcomes was similar irrespective of treatment assignment (P-interaction=0.65). Similar findings were observed using the exploratory targets. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more patients treated with ezetimibe/simvastatin met prespecified and exploratory dual LDL-C and hs-CRP targets than patients treated with simvastatin alone. Reaching both LDL-C and hs-CRP targets was associated with improved outcomes after multivariable adjustment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00202878.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Statins lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP); addition of ezetimibe to statins further reduces LDL-C and hs-CRP. An analysis of the relationship between achieved LDL-C and hs-CRP targets and outcomes for simvastatin and ezetimibe/simvastatin was prespecified in Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT). METHODS AND RESULTS: The IMPROVE-IT trial randomly assigned 18 144 patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome to simvastatin or ezetimibe/simvastatin. LDL-C and hs-CRP were measured at baseline and 1 month after randomization. Outcomes were assessed in those achieving one or both of the prespecified targets of LDL-C<70 mg/dL and hs-CRP<2 mg/L versus achieving neither target, adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. An exploratory analysis examined targets of LDL-C<50 mg/dL and hs-CRP<1 mg/L. Patients meeting both targets at baseline, with no 1-month values, or with end points before 1 month were excluded. Of 15 179 patients, 39% achieved the dual LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) and hs-CRP (<2 mg/L) targets at 1 month, 14% met neither target, 14% met only the hs-CRP target, and 33% met only the LDL-C target. Those achieving dual targets had lower primary end point rates than those meeting neither target (cardiovascular death, major coronary event, or stroke; 38.9% versus 28.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 0.66-0.81; P<0.001). More patients treated with ezetimibe/simvastatin met dual targets than those treated with simvastatin alone (50% versus 29%, P<0.001). The association of dual-target attainment with improved outcomes was similar irrespective of treatment assignment (P-interaction=0.65). Similar findings were observed using the exploratory targets. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more patients treated with ezetimibe/simvastatin met prespecified and exploratory dual LDL-C and hs-CRP targets than patients treated with simvastatin alone. Reaching both LDL-C and hs-CRP targets was associated with improved outcomes after multivariable adjustment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00202878.
Authors: José Tuñón; Lina Badimón; Marie-Luce Bochaton-Piallat; Bertrand Cariou; Mat J Daemen; Jesus Egido; Paul C Evans; Imo E Hoefer; Daniel F J Ketelhuth; Esther Lutgens; Christian M Matter; Claudia Monaco; Sabine Steffens; Erik Stroes; Cécile Vindis; Christian Weber; Magnus Bäck Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: V J J Schettler; J Ringel; S Jacob; U Julius; R Klingel; F Heigl; E Roeseler; P Grützmacher Journal: Internist (Berl) Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 0.743
Authors: Yashashwi Pokharel; Puza P Sharma; Mohammed Qintar; Yuan Lu; Yuanyuan Tang; Philip Jones; Rachel P Dreyer; John A Spertus Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Tracey G Simon; Kathleen E Corey; Christopher P Cannon; Michael Blazing; Jeong-Gun Park; Michelle L O'Donoghue; Raymond T Chung; Robert P Giugliano Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2018-05-26 Impact factor: 4.164