Literature DB >> 33199624

Solar geoengineering may not prevent strong warming from direct effects of CO2 on stratocumulus cloud cover.

Tapio Schneider1,2, Colleen M Kaul3, Kyle G Pressel3.   

Abstract

Discussions of countering global warming with solar geoengineering assume that warming owing to rising greenhouse-gas concentrations can be compensated by artificially reducing the amount of sunlight Earth absorbs. However, solar geoengineering may not be fail-safe to prevent global warming because CO2 can directly affect cloud cover: It reduces cloud cover by modulating the longwave radiative cooling within the atmosphere. This effect is not mitigated by solar geoengineering. Here, we use idealized high-resolution simulations of clouds to show that, even under a sustained solar geoengineering scenario with initially only modest warming, subtropical stratocumulus clouds gradually thin and may eventually break up into scattered cumulus clouds, at concentrations exceeding 1,700 parts per million (ppm). Because stratocumulus clouds cover large swaths of subtropical oceans and cool Earth by reflecting incident sunlight, their loss would trigger strong (about 5 K) global warming. Thus, the results highlight that, at least in this extreme and idealized scenario, solar geoengineering may not suffice to counter greenhouse-gas-driven global warming.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cloud feedback; geoengineering; global warming

Year:  2020        PMID: 33199624      PMCID: PMC7720182          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2003730117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

Review 1.  Insights into low-latitude cloud feedbacks from high-resolution models.

Authors:  Christopher S Bretherton
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Weakening of tropical Pacific atmospheric circulation due to anthropogenic forcing.

Authors:  Gabriel A Vecchi; Brian J Soden; Andrew T Wittenberg; Isaac M Held; Ants Leetmaa; Matthew J Harrison
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Global and Arctic climate engineering: numerical model studies.

Authors:  Ken Caldeira; Lowell Wood
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle.

Authors:  G Bala; P B Duffy; K E Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Direct weakening of tropical circulations from masked CO2 radiative forcing.

Authors:  Timothy M Merlis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination.

Authors:  Christopher H Trisos; Giuseppe Amatulli; Jessica Gurevitch; Alan Robock; Lili Xia; Brian Zambri
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 7.  Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals.

Authors:  Mark G Lawrence; Stefan Schäfer; Helene Muri; Vivian Scott; Andreas Oschlies; Naomi E Vaughan; Olivier Boucher; Hauke Schmidt; Jim Haywood; Jürgen Scheffran
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Anthropogenic forcing and response yield observed positive trend in Earth's energy imbalance.

Authors:  Shiv Priyam Raghuraman; David Paynter; V Ramaswamy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 14.919

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.