Literature DB >> 18757275

Global and Arctic climate engineering: numerical model studies.

Ken Caldeira1, Lowell Wood.   

Abstract

We perform numerical simulations of the atmosphere, sea ice and upper ocean to examine possible effects of diminishing incoming solar radiation, insolation, on the climate system. We simulate both global and Arctic climate engineering in idealized scenarios in which insolation is diminished above the top of the atmosphere. We consider the Arctic scenarios because climate change is manifesting most strongly there. Our results indicate that, while such simple insolation modulation is unlikely to perfectly reverse the effects of greenhouse gas warming, over a broad range of measures considering both temperature and water, an engineered high CO2 climate can be made much more similar to the low CO2 climate than would be a high CO2 climate in the absence of such engineering. At high latitudes, there is less sunlight deflected per unit albedo change but climate system feedbacks operate more powerfully there. These two effects largely cancel each other, making the global mean temperature response per unit top-of-atmosphere albedo change relatively insensitive to latitude. Implementing insolation modulation appears to be feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757275     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  6 in total

Review 1.  Arctic climate tipping points.

Authors:  Timothy M Lenton
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivine.

Authors:  Peter Köhler; Jens Hartmann; Dieter A Wolf-Gladrow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Solar geoengineering may not prevent strong warming from direct effects of CO2 on stratocumulus cloud cover.

Authors:  Tapio Schneider; Colleen M Kaul; Kyle G Pressel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment: a small-scale experiment to improve understanding of the risks of solar geoengineering.

Authors:  John A Dykema; David W Keith; James G Anderson; Debra Weisenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals.

Authors:  Mark G Lawrence; Stefan Schäfer; Helene Muri; Vivian Scott; Andreas Oschlies; Naomi E Vaughan; Olivier Boucher; Hauke Schmidt; Jim Haywood; Jürgen Scheffran
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Ocean acidification in a geoengineering context.

Authors:  Phillip Williamson; Carol Turley
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.