Literature DB >> 33199506

Assessing readiness to manage intimate partner violence 12 months after completion of an educational program in fracture clinics: a pretest-posttest study.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the EDUCATE study was to determine whether an intimate partner violence educational program for health care providers working in fracture clinics increased their knowledge about intimate partner violence and their preparedness to discuss this topic with their patients. Here, we present the long-term (12-mo) follow-up data from the EDUCATE study to determine whether improvements in knowledge were maintained.
METHODS: For this pretest-posttest study, we enrolled 140 health care providers from 7 academic fracture clinics in Canada and the United States. Training took place between October 2016 and June 2017. We administered the Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey before participants completed the educational program (baseline), immediately after training, and at 3 months and 12 months after training. We used the actual knowledge subscale as the primary outcome for the planned 12-month analyses; we also report on the other subscales of the survey (perceived preparation to manage intimate partner violence, perceived knowledge about the issues, practice issues, preparation, legal requirements, workplace issues, self-efficacy, alcohol or drugs, and victim understanding). We used linear regression models to compare mean 12-month scores with mean baseline scores for each subscale of the survey.
RESULTS: Among the 109 participating health care providers for whom 12-month assessment data were available, we found statistically significant improvements in the actual knowledge about intimate partner violence subscale of the survey (mean difference [MD] 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69 to 3.32). Statistically significant improvements from baseline to 12 months were also observed for 8 of the 9 other subscales of the survey: perceived preparation (MD 2.06, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.24), perceived knowledge (MD 2.14, 95% CI 1.96 to 2.31), practice issues (MD 6.12, 95% CI 4.97 to 7.27), preparation (MD 1.10, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.26), legal requirements (MD 1.57, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.78), workplace issues (MD 1.19, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.35), self-efficacy (MD 0.56, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.67) and alcohol and drugs (MD 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.21). Improvements relative to baseline were not observed for the victim understanding subscale.
INTERPRETATION: The EDUCATE program led to significant improvements in health care providers' readiness to manage intimate partner violence, with positive changes being observed 12 months after training. These findings indicate that health care providers who receive this training may be better equipped to manage the care of patients who have experienced intimate partner violence. Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33199506      PMCID: PMC7676989          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  10 in total

Review 1.  Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Norman; Jeff A Sloan; Kathleen W Wyrwich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  A tool for measuring physician readiness to manage intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Lynn M Short; Elaine Alpert; John M Harris; Zita J Surprenant
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Ontario chiropractors' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about intimate partner violence among their patients: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Heather M Shearer; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Novel educational program improves readiness to manage intimate partner violence within the fracture clinic: a pretest-posttest study.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-12-18

Review 5.  Best methods for evaluating educational impact: a comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction.

Authors:  Katherine Schilling; Rachel Applegate
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2012-10

Review 6.  A scoping review of intimate partner violence educational programs for health care professionals.

Authors:  Sheila Sprague; Aparna Swaminathan; Gerard P Slobogean; Hayley Spurr; Erika Arseneau; Lucshman Raveendran; Muzammil Memon; Taryn Scott; Gina Agarwal; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2018-01-15

7.  Chiropractors' perceptions about intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Heather M Shearer; Mary L Forte; Sonia Dosanjh; David J Mathews; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Orthopaedic Trainees Retain Knowledge After a Partner Abuse Course: An Education Study.

Authors:  Kim Madden; Sheila Sprague; Brad A Petrisor; Forough Farrokhyar; Michelle A Ghert; Marium Kirmani; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  (Mis)perceptions about intimate partner violence in women presenting for orthopaedic care: a survey of Canadian orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Sheila Sprague; Paul Tornetta; Valerie D'Aurora; Emil Schemitsch; Heather Shearer; Ole Brink; David Mathews; Sonia Dosanjh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Prevalence of abuse and intimate partner violence surgical evaluation (PRAISE) in orthopaedic fracture clinics: a multinational prevalence study.

Authors:  Sheila Sprague; Mohit Bhandari; Gregory J Della Rocca; J Carel Goslings; Rudolf W Poolman; Kim Madden; Nicole Simunovic; Sonia Dosanjh; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Measuring the readiness to screen and manage intimate partner violence: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the PREMIS tool for perinatal care providers.

Authors:  Candy Guiguet-Auclair; Anne Debost-Legrand; Didier Lémery; Chloé Barasinski; Blandine Mulin; Françoise Vendittelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.