| Literature DB >> 33195757 |
Zhu Liu1, Catrina Heffernan2, Jie Tan1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Caregiver burden is used frequently within the nursing literature. It has not yet been clearly defined as there are different opinions regarding this concept. The purpose of this paper is to provide clarity surrounding the concept caregiver burden.Entities:
Keywords: Burden; Caregivers; Cost of illness; Home nursing; Mental health; Quality of life
Year: 2020 PMID: 33195757 PMCID: PMC7644552 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.07.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nurs Sci ISSN: 2352-0132
Fig. 1PRISMA flow diagram.
The tools used to measure caregiver burden.
| Tool | Number of items | Rating scale | Aspects | Reliability (Cronbach’s α) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) [ | 22 | 5-point Likert scale (0–4) | Personal stress | 0.85–0.89 |
| Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale (CRA) [ | 24 | 5-point Likert scale (1–5) | Self-esteem | 0.70–0.76 |
| Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) [ | 24 | 5-point Likert scale (0–4) | Time dependence | 0.90 |
| Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) [ | 13 | yes (=1), no (=0) | Occupation | 0.69 |
| Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale (ZBS) [ | 22 | 5-point Likert scale (0–4) | Negative emotions | 0.91 |
Fig. 2Conceptual model of caregiver burden.