Yun-Hsiang Lee1, Yu-Chien Liao2, Shiow-Ching Shun1, Kuan-Chia Lin3, Wei-Yu Liao4, Pi-Hua Chang5, Sin-Yuan Jhang6, Chong-Jen Yu4, Pan-Chyr Yang4, Pei-Yin Hsieh6, Yeur-Hur Lai1. 1. School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Department of Nursing, Yuanpei University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan. 3. Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, Community Medicine Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Department of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. 6. Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) identify the changes of 5 domains of family caregiver (FC) burden, overall burden, and its subtrajectories when caring for newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer patients during the first 6 months following cancer diagnosis; and (2) identify the FC-related and patient-related factors most associated with the overall FC burden and each of its subtrajectories. METHODS: A total of 150 newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer patient-FC dyads were recruited from a Taiwanese medical center. The overall FC burden was evaluated 4 times: before treatment, and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The potential subtrajectory of the caregiver burden was investigated by latent class growth analysis. The FC-related and patient-related factors having the greatest effect on the overall FC burden and its subtrajectories over time were identified by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: The highest level of burden domain was "Impact on daily schedule" over time. Generally, most of the FC reported a moderate level of overall burden over the investigation period. Three subtrajectories of the overall FC burden over time (% caregivers) were identified: high burden (34.7%), moderate burden (56.0%), and low burden (9.3%), respectively. The self-efficacy of FC was the strongest factor related to the changes of the FC's burden and burden in each subtrajectory. CONCLUSION: The results support the existing and different types of subtrajectories of the FC's burden. Health care professionals should provide care based on those differences. Further research to test interventions which integrate those important factors related to FC's burden, particularly FC's self-efficacy, is strongly suggested.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) identify the changes of 5 domains of family caregiver (FC) burden, overall burden, and its subtrajectories when caring for newly diagnosed advanced lung cancerpatients during the first 6 months following cancer diagnosis; and (2) identify the FC-related and patient-related factors most associated with the overall FC burden and each of its subtrajectories. METHODS: A total of 150 newly diagnosed advanced lung cancerpatient-FC dyads were recruited from a Taiwanese medical center. The overall FC burden was evaluated 4 times: before treatment, and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The potential subtrajectory of the caregiver burden was investigated by latent class growth analysis. The FC-related and patient-related factors having the greatest effect on the overall FC burden and its subtrajectories over time were identified by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: The highest level of burden domain was "Impact on daily schedule" over time. Generally, most of the FC reported a moderate level of overall burden over the investigation period. Three subtrajectories of the overall FC burden over time (% caregivers) were identified: high burden (34.7%), moderate burden (56.0%), and low burden (9.3%), respectively. The self-efficacy of FC was the strongest factor related to the changes of the FC's burden and burden in each subtrajectory. CONCLUSION: The results support the existing and different types of subtrajectories of the FC's burden. Health care professionals should provide care based on those differences. Further research to test interventions which integrate those important factors related to FC's burden, particularly FC's self-efficacy, is strongly suggested.
Authors: Daiming Xiu; Yat-Lui Fung; Bobo Hi-Po Lau; Daniel F K Wong; Celia H Y Chan; Rainbow T H Ho; Tsz-Him So; Tai-Chung Lam; Victor Ho-Fun Lee; Anne W M Lee; Sau Fong Chow; Fai Man Lim; Miu Wah Tsang; Cecilia L W Chan; Amy Y M Chow Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Megan C Thomas Hebdon; Lorinda A Coombs; Pamela Reed; Tracy E Crane; Terry A Badger Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Francisco García-Torres; Marcin J Jabłoński; Ángel Gómez Solís; María José Jaén-Moreno; Mario Gálvez-Lara; Juan A Moriana; María José Moreno-Díaz; Enrique Aranda Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Wagahta Semere; Andrew D Althouse; Ann-Marie Rosland; Douglas White; Robert Arnold; Edward Chu; Thomas J Smith; Yael Schenker Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 3.929