| Literature DB >> 33194624 |
Xin Yan1,2, Yongtian Zhao3, Yang Liu2, Qingming Yang2, Liang Dong2, Zhiqiang Wu2, Jing Nie2, Deyun Chen2, Miaomiao Bai2, Dongdong Ti2, Kaichao Feng2, Weidong Han1,2.
Abstract
Background: Although the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have markedly changed the strategies of cancer treatment, most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not respond to PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Epigenetic drugs have been hypothesized to possess the potential to sensitize PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Case Presentation: Three patients with advanced metastatic NSCLC failed to respond to first-line systemic therapy and had a low tumor mutation burden, low tumor neoantigen burden, low microsatellite instability, and HLA loss of heterozygosity according to their target lesion biopsies, all of which were considered unfavorable factors for PD-1/PD-L1 blockage. However, all three patients responded to low-dose decitabine, an epigenetic drug, in combination with camrelizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody), with only controllable adverse events, indicating that low-dose decitabine can sensitize PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Summary: We report a novel therapy with low-dose decitabine plus camrelizumab for advanced NSCLC on the basis of successful treatment of three patients, emphasizing the potential of epigenetic drugs to regulate PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC.Entities:
Keywords: decitabine; epigenetics; immunotherapy; programmed cell death protein 1; treatment
Year: 2020 PMID: 33194624 PMCID: PMC7649792 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.558572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging scan before (A,C,E) and after (B,D,F) low-dose decitabine combined with camrelizumab therapy in these 3 cases. Tumor lesions are indicated by red arrows.
Patient characteristics and whole exon sequencing results of tumor biopsies before and after decitabine plus camrelizumab combination therapy.
| Gender | M | F | F | |
| Age | 47 | 74 | 46 | |
| Stage at diagnosis | IV, metastatic | IV, metastatic | IV, metastatic | |
| Smoker | Yes | No | No | |
| EGFR mutations | No | L858R, T790M | No | |
| ALK mutations | No | No | No | |
| Before | TMB (Muts/Mb) | 7.83 | 2.49 | 1.91 |
| TNB (Neos/Mb) | 3.72 | 1.55 | 0.75 | |
| MSI (%) | L:1.91 | L:2.47 | L:4.72 | |
| HLA LOH | HLA-C:03*03 | HLA-A:33*03 HLA-B:44*03 HLA-C:07*06 | HLA-B:46*01 HLA-C:01*02 | |
| PD-L1 (%) | Positive | NR | Positive | |
| After | TMB (Muts/Mb) | 0.1 | 2.98 | 1.16 |
| TNB (Neos/Mb) | 0.03 | 1.32 | 0.45 | |
| MSI (%) | L:1.50 | L:1.91 | L:0.78 | |
| HLA LOH | HLA-C:03*03 | HLA-A:33*03 HLA-B:44*03 HLA-C:07*06 | HLA-B:46*01 HLA-C:01*02 | |
| PFS (months) | 5.4 | 6.8 | 6.5 | |
PFS, progression free survival; TMB, tumor mutation burden; TNB, tumor neoantigen burden; MSI, microsatellite instability; HLA LOH, HLA loss of heterozygous.
Figure 2The treatment timeline of the three patients.