Literature DB >> 30409776

Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarkers of Response to Azacitidine and Nivolumab in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Nonrandomized, Open-Label, Phase II Study.

Padmanee Sharma1,2, Hagop Kantarjian3, Naval Daver3, Guillermo Garcia-Manero4, Sreyashi Basu5, Prajwal C Boddu4, Mansour Alfayez4, Jorge E Cortes4, Marina Konopleva4, Farhad Ravandi-Kashani4, Elias Jabbour4, Tapan Kadia4, Graciela M Nogueras-Gonzalez6, Jing Ning6, Naveen Pemmaraju4, Courtney D DiNardo4, Michael Andreeff4, Sherry A Pierce4, Tauna Gordon4, Steven M Kornblau4, Wilmer Flores4, Zainab Alhamal5, Carlos Bueso-Ramos7, Jeffrey L Jorgensen7, Keyur P Patel7, Jorge Blando5, James P Allison5.   

Abstract

Preclinical models have shown that blocking PD-1/PD-L1 pathways enhances antileukemic responses. Azacitidine upregulates PD-1 and IFNγ signaling. We therefore conducted this single-arm trial, in which patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were treated with azacitidine 75 mg/m2 days 1 to 7 intravenously or subcutaneously with nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 14, every 4 to 6 weeks. For the seventy patients who were treated, the median age was 70 years (range, 22-90) and the median number of prior therapies received was 2 (range, 1-7). The overall response rate (ORR) was 33%, including 15 (22%) complete remission/complete remission with insufficient recovery of counts, 1 partial response, and 7 patients with hematologic improvement maintained >6 months. Six patients (9%) had stable disease >6 months. The ORR was 58% and 22%, in hypomethylating agent (HMA)-naïve (n = 25) and HMA-pretreated (n = 45) patients, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 8 (11%) patients. Pretherapy bone marrow and peripheral blood CD3 and CD8 were significantly predictive for response on flow cytometry. CTLA4 was significantly upregulated on CD4+ Teff in nonresponders after 2 and 4 doses of nivolumab. Azacitidine and nivolumab therapy produced an encouraging response rate and overall survival in patients with R/R AML, particularly in HMA-naïve and salvage 1 patients. Pretherapy bone marrow aspirate and peripheral blood CD3 percentage may be biomarkers for patient selection. SIGNIFICANCE: Azacitidine in combination with nivolumab appeared to be a safe and effective therapy in patients with AML who were salvage 1, prior hypomethylator-naïve, or had increased pretherapy CD3+ bone marrow infiltrate by flow cytometry or IHC. Bone marrow CD3 and CD8 are relatively simple assays that should be incorporated to select patients in future trials. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 305. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30409776      PMCID: PMC6397669          DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Discov        ISSN: 2159-8274            Impact factor:   39.397


  141 in total

1.  The wolf of hypomethylating agent failure: what comes next?

Authors:  Anne Sophie Kubasch; Uwe Platzbecker
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  R R Kansara; C Speziali
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Immune-Based Therapies in Acute Leukemia.

Authors:  Matthew T Witkowski; Audrey Lasry; William L Carroll; Iannis Aifantis
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2019-08-29

Review 4.  Immune checkpoint-based therapy in myeloid malignancies: a promise yet to be fulfilled.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Maximilian Stahl; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.512

5.  Immune landscapes predict chemotherapy resistance and immunotherapy response in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jayakumar Vadakekolathu; Mark D Minden; Tressa Hood; Sarah E Church; Stephen Reeder; Heidi Altmann; Amy H Sullivan; Elena J Viboch; Tasleema Patel; Narmin Ibrahimova; Sarah E Warren; Andrea Arruda; Yan Liang; Thomas H Smith; Gemma A Foulds; Michael D Bailey; James Gowen-MacDonald; John Muth; Marc Schmitz; Alessandra Cesano; A Graham Pockley; Peter J M Valk; Bob Löwenberg; Martin Bornhäuser; Sarah K Tasian; Michael P Rettig; Jan K Davidson-Moncada; John F DiPersio; Sergio Rutella
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 6.  Emerging agents and regimens for treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Longzhen Cui; Yan Liu; Yifan Pang; Tingting Qian; Liang Quan; Zhiheng Cheng; Yifeng Dai; Xu Ye; Ying Pang; Jinlong Shi; Xiaoyan Ke; Depei Wu; Lin Fu
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 5.987

Review 7.  Following in the footsteps of acute myeloid leukemia: are we witnessing the start of a therapeutic revolution for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes?

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2020-05-18

Review 8.  PD1 inhibitor in combination with 5-azacytidine and low-dose DLI for the successful treatment of AML patients who relapsed after transplantation.

Authors:  Chong-Sheng Qian; Xiao Ma; Jin Wang; Ting-Jing Wang; Lian Bai; Hai-Xia Zhou; Ming-Zhu Xu; Ai-Ning Sun; De-Pei Wu; Song-Bai Liu; Sheng-Li Xue
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 9.  T cell optimization for graft-versus-leukemia responses.

Authors:  Melinda A Biernacki; Vipul S Sheth; Marie Bleakley
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-05-07

Review 10.  Alterations of T-cell-mediated immunity in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Zhuoyan Li; Mary Philip; P Brent Ferrell
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.