| Literature DB >> 33194208 |
F Moradi1, N Hadi1,2, A Bazargani1.
Abstract
Today an alternative approach to control bacterial infections is the use of natural and traditional plant compounds to interfere with their quorum-sensing (QS) systems. In this study, antibacterial and anti-QS sensing activity of Syzygium aromaticum, Dionysia revoluta Boiss. and Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. were evaluated. These plants are local to the Middle East region and have since ancient times been used for their antibacterial activity. Plant compounds were extracted with n-hexane, methanol and 96% ethanol mixed solvent. Antibacterial activity of this herbal extracts against five Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria were assessed. The effective sub-minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of this extract on bacterial QS systems were investigated by a violacein quantification assay in the Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 biosensor strain, inhibition of exogenously QS signal molecules in Aeromonas veronii bv. Sobria strain BC88 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from a patient with cystic fibrosis in vitro. Results found that Syzygium aromaticum 0.39 to 0.048 mg/mL, Dionysia revoluta Boiss. 3.1 to 0.39 mg/mL and E. camaldulensis 0.78 to 0.097 mg/mL showed anti-QS activities by reducing the violacein formation depletion of QS signals produced in A. veronii and P. aeruginosa at sub-MICs. Regarding the anti-QS effects of these herbal extracts, their effective components may be candidates for use in combating bacterial infections at sub-MICs.Entities:
Keywords: Anti–quorum sensing; Dionysia revoluta; Eucalyptus camaldulensis; Syzygium aromaticum; plant extracts
Year: 2020 PMID: 33194208 PMCID: PMC7644747 DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: New Microbes New Infect ISSN: 2052-2975
Plant compounds extracted
| Characteristic | Species | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Syzygium aromaticum | |||
| Voucher | 1093 | 780 | 1092 |
| Plant family | |||
| Common name | Stone bride of Iran | Eucalyptus | Dianthus |
| Tested part | Whole plant | Leaves | Stem |
| Weight (g) | 88 | 60 | 90 |
| Solvents (mixed) | |||
| Yield (%) | 3.8 | 11.5 | 18.8 |
| Extract colours | Brown | Green | Dark brown |
| Clinical use [reference] | Antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer [ | Antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant [ | Antibacterial [ |
| Main chemical components [reference] | 2-Acetophenone, benzaldehyde, 2- acetyl phenol, β-farnesyl alcohol, eugenol, rosifoliol, γ-eudesmol, ο-hydroxychalcone, other [ | 1,8-Cineole, | Eugenol, β-caryophyllene, vanillin, crategolic acid, kaempferol, rhamnetin, eugenitin, ellagic acid, gallic acid, biflorin, myricetin, other [ |
Voucher specimen was deposited in herbarium of Shiraz Faculty of Pharmacy, Shiraz, Iran.
Fig. 1Violacein quantification assay in 96-well plate. (A1–A3) Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 culture without AHL and herbal extract concentration (negative control). (B1–B3) C. violaceum CV026 culture with AHL and without herbal extract concentration as positive control. (C1–F1) C. violaceum CV026 culture with sub–minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Syzygium aromaticum (0.39, 0.195, 0.097, 0.048 mg/mL). (C2–F2) C. violaceum CV026 culture with sub-MIC of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. (0.78, 0.39, 0.195, 0.097 mg/mL). (C3–F3) C. violaceum CV026 culture with sub-MIC of Dionysia revoluta Boiss. (3.1, 1.56, 0.78, 0.39 mg/mL). AHL, acyl-homoserine lactone.
Antibacterial effect of plant extracts on Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria
| Characteristic | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC | SA | DR | EC | SA | DR | EC | SA | DR | EC | SA | DR | EC | SA | DR | |
| Plant concentration | |||||||||||||||
| 50 mg/mL | 18 ± 0.5 | 15 ± 0.7 | 15 ± 0.2 | 16 ± 0.1 | 14 ± 0.8 | 15 ± 0.1 | 15 ± 1.1 | 17.9 ± 0.7 | 14 ± 0.2 | 19 ± 1.2 | 17.1 ± 0.5 | 15 ± 1.1 | 14.5 ± 0.5 | 13.2 ± 0.6 | 13.5 ± 0.8 |
| 25 mg/mL | 17.1 ± 0.3 | 14.3 ± 0.6 | 14.5 ± 0.3 | 15.2 ± 0.2 | 13.1 ± 0.5 | 14.1 ± 0.3 | 14.2 ± 1.4 | 17.1 ± 0.5 | 13.5 ± 0.3 | 18.6 ± 1.1 | 16.7 ± 0.5 | 14.2 ± 1.2 | 14 ± 0.6 | 12.5 ± 0.5 | 13.2 ± 0.5 |
| 12.5 mg/mL | 16.2 ± 0.5 | 13 ± 0.4 | 13.4 ± 0.4 | 14.1 ± 0.3 | 12.4 ± 0.5 | 12.8 ± 0.1 | 13.2 ± 1.2 | 16.9 ± 0.2 | 12.6 ± 0.5 | 17.7 ± 1.3 | 16 ± 0.4 | 13.5 ± 1.3 | 13.2 ± 0.7 | 12.1 ± 0.5 | 12.8 ± 0.4 |
| 6.25 mg/mL | 15.4 ± 0.6 | 12.1 ± 0.5 | 12.6 ± 0.4 | 13 ± 0.2 | 11.2 ± 0.6 | 11.9 ± 0.4 | 11.9 ± 1.5 | 15.3 ± 0.9 | 11.1 ± 0.4 | 17 ± 1.2 | 15.5 ± 0.9 | 12 ± 1.1 | 12.6 ± 0.3 | 11.6 ± 0.7 | 12.5 ± 0.5 |
| 3.12 mg/mL | 14.5 ± 0.5 | 11.8 ± 0.3 | 10.9 ± 0.2 | 11.5 ± 0.2 | 10.5 ± 0.3 | 10.2 ± 0.2 | 10.6 ± 1.1 | 14.1 ± 0.3 | 10 ± 0.1 | 16.8 ± 1.1 | 14.4 ± 0.3 | 0 | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 11.1 ± 0.4 | 11.8 ± 0.6 |
| 1.56 mg/mL | 13.2 ± 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 9.8 ± 0.3 | 9.6 ± 0.5 | 8.8 ± 0.3 | 9.5 ± 1.3 | 13.2 ± 0.5 | 8.4 ± 0.4 | 16.3 ± 1 | 13.1 ± 0.5 | 0 | 10 ± 0.7 | 10.5 ± 0.1 | 0 |
| 0.78 mg/mL | 11.8 ± 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 ± 0.5 | 8.1 ± 0.3 | 5 ± 0.2 | 8.5 ± 1.4 | 11.8 ± 0.6 | 0 | 15.6 ± 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.7 ± 0.2 | 0 |
| 0.39 mg/mL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 10.1 ± 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DMSO (negative control) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| Tetracycline (30 μg) (positive control) | 22 ± 0.2 | 29 ± 0.3 | 18 ± 0.5 | 19 ± 0.3 | 14 ± 0.2 | ||||||||||
Plant extract genus and species abbreviations are as follows: EC, Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.; SA, Syzygium aromaticum; DR, Dionysia revoluta Boiss. Data are shown as mean ± SD (mm) inhibition zone.
DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Characteristics of plant extract MICs in vitro
| Plant species | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBC | MIC | Sub-MIC | MBC | MIC | Sub-MIC | MBC | MIC | Sub-MIC | |
| 25 | 6.25 | 3.1 to 0.39 | 6.25 | 1.56 | 0.78, 0.39 | 12.5 | 0.39 | 0.195, 0.097 | |
| 6.25 | 1.56 | 0.78 to 0.097 | 6.25 | 0.78 | 0.39, 0.195 | 3.1 | 0.195 | 0.097, 0.048 | |
| 12.5 | 0.78 | 0.39 to 0.048 | 3.1 | 0.39 | 0.195, 0.97 | 6.25 | 0.97 | 0.048, 0.024 | |
MBC, minimal bactericidal concentration (mg/mL); MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration (mg/mL); sub-MIC, sub–minimum inhibitory concentration used for anti–quorum-sensing assay (mg/mL).
Fig. 2Results of violacein quantification assay in 96-well plate. Bacterial population was stable in presence of sub–minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of herbal extracts (OD600nm = 1); inhibition of violacein production was thus observed after treatment by increasing sub-MIC of herbal extracts compared to controls (OD585nm). Experiments were performed in triplicate and results expressed as mean ± SD.
Fig. 3Results from calculated violacein inhibition percentage in 96-well plate. OD C is OD585nm for violacein production in control wells (without herbal extracts), and OD T is OD585nm for violacein production in presence of herbal extracts. Analysis showed that Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. in 0.78, 0.39 mg/mL, S. aromaticum in 0.39, 0.195 mg/mL and Dionysia revoluta Boiss. in 3.1, 1.56 mg/mL showed maximum reduced violacein production in Chromobacterium violaceum CV026. Statistical significance of each test (n = 4) was evaluated by conducting one-way ANOVA, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Fig. 4Results from quorum-sensing (QS) inhibition assay on Luria-Bertani agar plates. Anti-QS effect of Syzygium aromaticum (0.39 mg/mL), Dionysia revoluta Boiss. (3.1 mg/mL) and Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. (0.78 mg/mL) shown without pigmented colony. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) served as negative control and had no anti-QS effect.
Fig. 5Results from anti–quorum-sensing (QS) activity through signal inhibition in Aeromonas veronii bv. Sobria BC88. In control well, exogenous QS signals were produced and diffused through A. veronii; these molecules were tracked with purple pigments produced by Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 in Luria-Bertani agar. At minimal bactericidal concentration, A. veronii was killed and could not diffuse signals, but in presence of sub–minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of herbal extracts, bacterial populations were fixed (OD600nm = 1), and QS signal diffusion zone was decreased compared to control (mean ± SD, p < 0.05).
Fig. 6Results from anti–quorum-sensing (QS) activity through signal inhibition in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In control well, exogenously QS signals are produced and diffused through P. aeruginosa; these molecules were tracked with purple pigments produced by Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 in Luria-Bertani agar. In minimal bactericidal concentrations, P. aeruginosa was killed and could not diffuse signals, but in presence of sub–minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of herbal extracts, bacterial populations were fixed (OD600nm = 1), and QS signal diffusion zone was decreased compared to control (mean ± SD, p < 0.05).