| Literature DB >> 33194115 |
Lukasz Palka1,2, Justyna Mazurek-Popczyk3, Katarzyna Arkusz4, Katarzyna Baldy-Chudzik3.
Abstract
Background: In the oral and maxillofacial surgery, fixation plates are commonly used for the stabilization of bone fragments. Additive manufacturing has enabled us to design and create personalized fixation devices that would ideally fit any given fracture. Aim: The aim of the present preliminary study was to assess the susceptibility of 3D-printed titanium fixation plates to biofilm formation.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; Fixation plate; bacterial contamination; biofilm formation; surface topography
Year: 2020 PMID: 33194115 PMCID: PMC7598999 DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2020.1838164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Microbiol ISSN: 2000-2297 Impact factor: 5.474
The collective representation of the results of chemical composition microstructure analysis
| Ti [%] | Al. [%] | V [%] | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| min | max | average | min | max | average | min | max | average | ||
| 87.30 | 90.28 | 89.02 | 6.83 | 7.81 | 7.29 | 2.63 | 4.90 | 3.69 | ||
Ti- titanium; A- aluminum; V–vanadium.
General printing parameters
| Parameter | Norm | Range (after heat treatment) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard accuracy [mm] | - | ± 0.2% (± 0.2) |
| Layer thickness [mm] | - | 0.03 ÷ 0.6 (used 0.034) |
| Maximum dimension of the part [mm] | - | 245 x 245 × 270 mm |
| Ultimate tensile strength | DIN EN ISO 6892–1:2009 | 1029 ± 80 MPa |
| Ultimate elongation [%] | 14 ± 0.4% | |
| Young’s modulus [GPa] | DIN EN ISO 6892–1:2009 | 104 ÷ 124 |
| Impact strength [J] | - | 7 ÷ 15 |
| Hardness [HV5] | DIN EN ISO 6507–1 | 320 ± 15 |
| Relative density [%] | - | > 99.5 |
| Density [g/cm3] | - | 4.41 |
| Max. operating temperature [°C] | - | 350 |
The mean values of surface roughness parameters, measured for three samples at five different places
| Area [pm2] | Sa [nm] | Sq [nm] | Sy [nm] | Sp [nm] | Sv [nm] | Sm [pm] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.20 | 102.75 ± 6.03 | 134.92 ± 6.80 | 1187.40 ± 88.16 | 602.35 ± 29.08 | −585.06 ± 31.04 | −0.0031 ± 0.0001 |
Sa – the difference in height of each point compared to the arithmetical mean of the surface; Sq – the root mean square value of the ordinate values within the defined area. It is equivalent to the standard deviation of heights; Sp – the height of the highest peak within the defined area; Sv – the absolute value of the height of the largest pit (valley) within the defined area; Sm – the mean spacing between peaks.
Figure 1.The topography of the surface of the fixation plates
Figure 2.Mean values and standard deviation of the assessment of metabolic activity in biofilms using TTC assay. This test demonstrated that after 48 h of incubation, all tested microorganisms present on the surface of the fixation plates showed metabolic activity in biofilms, but in a differentiated manner (Figure 2)
Average values of the number of cells recovered from the biofilm formed on the surface of the fixation plate model
| Strains from | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean number of microbial cells CFU/plate | 2.3 x 107 | 4.45 x 107 | 11.9 x 107 | 0.78 x 107 | 1.32 x 107 |
Figure 3.(a), (b). Scanning electron microscopic image showing massive colonization by S. mutans.
Figure 4.(a), (b). Scanning electron microscopic image showing biofilm of S. epidermidis.
Figure 5.(a), (b). Scanning electron microscopic image showing biofilm of S. aureus.
Figure 6.(a), (b). Scanning electron microscopic image showing biofilm of L. rhamnosus.
Figure 7.(a), (b). Scanning electron microscopic image showing biofilm of C. albicans.