| Literature DB >> 33193694 |
Jing Li1,2,3, Ziheng Zhou2,3, Hai-Xi Sun2,3,4, Wenjie Ouyang2,3, Guoyi Dong1,2,3, Tianbin Liu1,2,3, Lei Ge2,3, Xiuqing Zhang2,3,5, Chao Liu2,3, Ying Gu2,3,6.
Abstract
β-thalassemia, caused by mutations in the human hemoglobin β (HBB) gene, is one of the most common genetic diseases in the world. The HBB -28(A>G) mutation is one of the five most common mutations in Chinese patients with β-thalassemia. However, few studies have been conducted to understand how this mutation affects the expression of pathogenesis-related genes, including globin genes, due to limited homozygote clinical materials. Therefore, we developed an efficient technique using CRISPR/Cas9 combined with asymmetric single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (assODNs) to generate a K562 cell model with HBB -28(A>G) named K562-28(A>G). Then, we systematically analyzed the differences between K562-28(A>G) and K562 at the transcriptome level by high-throughput RNA-seq before and after erythroid differentiation. We found that the HBB -28(A>G) mutation not only disturbed the transcription of HBB, but also decreased the expression of HBG, which may further aggravate the thalassemia phenotype and partially explain the more severe clinical outcome of β-thalassemia patients with the HBB -28(A>G) mutation. Moreover, we found that the K562-28(A>G) cell line is more sensitive to hypoxia and shows a defective erythrogenic program compared with K562 before differentiation. Importantly, all abovementioned abnormalities in K562-28(A>G) were reversed after correction of this mutation with CRISPR/Cas9 and assODNs, confirming the specificity of these phenotypes. Overall, this is the first time to analyze the effects of the HBB -28(A>G) mutation at the whole-transcriptome level based on isogenic cell lines, providing a landscape for further investigation of the mechanism of β-thalassemia with the HBB -28(A>G) mutation.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; HBB -28(A>G); K562; RNA-seq; assODNs; isogenic cells; β-thalassemia
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193694 PMCID: PMC7580707 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.577053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
FIGURE 1Generation of K562–28(A>G) cell line by CRISPR/Cas9 combined with asymmetric ssODNs. (A) Experimental diagram of generation of the HBB −28(A>G) mutation cell line in K562. (B) The −28 region around HBB is targeted with two sgRNAs and asymmetric ssODNs provided along with CRISPR/Cas9 DNA cleavage to generate −28(A>G) mutation. sgRNA1 and sgRNA2 are complementary to the sense and antisense strands, respectively. sgRNA2 is not labeled but the PAM was showed in red color. Mutation site is indicated with red color in the middle of sequence. PAM: protospacer adjacent motif (orange). (C) Identification of −28(A>G; G>A) mutation by sanger sequencing. Expected mutation is shown in the red rectangle. (D) Determination of the expression of HBB by qRT-PCR in K562–28(A>G) and K562. (E) Determination of the expression of HBB by ELISA with benzidine staining in K562–28(A>G) and K562.
FIGURE 2Transcriptome analysis of K562 and K562–28(A>G) cell lines before erythroid differentiation. (A) Pairwise Pearson correlations are represented in matrix between K562 and K562–28(A>G) in two batches before differentiation. (B) The correlation between K562 and K562–28(A>G) before differentiation. (C) Heat map shows the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between K562 and K562–28(A>G) cell lines; genes related to hypoxia are showed on the right. (D) Enrichment analysis of GO, KEGG, and Reactome pathways based on DEGs in K562–28(A>G) before differentiation; the upregulated pathways are shown in blue, and the downregulated pathways are shown in green. (E) The predicted interaction network of transcription factors (TFs) in DEGs and their target genes in K562–28(A>G) before differentiation. The hypoxia genes are shown in red.
FIGURE 3Transcriptome analysis of coregulated genes in K562 and K562–28(A>G) cell lines after erythroid differentiation. (A) Pairwise Pearson correlations are represented in matrix between K562 and K562–28(A>G). The differentiated groups are clustered together. (B) Heat map shows the coregulated genes in K562 and K562–28(A>G) after erythroid differentiation when compared to those before differentiation. (C) KEGG signaling pathways enriched in differentiated K562 and K562–28(A>G) when compared to their corresponding cell lines before differentiation. (D) The IGV shows the HBB gene expression in K562 and K562–28(A>G) cell lines. (E) Expression of globin genes determined by RNA-seq in the K562 and K562–28(A>G) cell lines pre- and post- induction. (F) Change trends, post-induction FPKM/pre-induction FPKM (log2 f.c) of globin genes determined by RNA-seq in the K562 and K562–28(A>G) cell lines pre- and post- induction. (G) Expression of globin HBB and HBG determined by qRT-PCR in the K562 and K562–28(A>G) cell lines pre- and post- induction. (H) Change trends of globin HBB and HBG determined by qRT-PCR in the K562 and K562–28(A>G) cell lines pre- and post- induction. T-test was used to process statistical analysis. *** means p < 0.001. (I) Expression of key transcription factors related to erythroid differentiation. Y axis represents expression level (FPKM).
FIGURE 4Transcriptome analysis of DEGs in K562 and K562–28(A>G) cell lines after erythroid differentiation. (A) Heat map shows DEGs in K562–28(A>G) compared to K562 after differentiation. (B) Pathway analysis of K562–28(A>G) compared to K562 after differentiation. The upregulated pathways are shown in green, and the downregulated pathways are shown in blue. (C) Enriched pathways and their DEGs in O2/CO2 exchange in erythrocytes, negative regulation of hemopoiesis, as well as negative regulation of hemostasis. Upregulated DEGs are shown in red, and downregulated DEGs are shown in blue. (D) The prediction of TFs in K562 after differentiation. (E) The prediction of TFs in K562–28(A>G) after differentiation.
FIGURE 5Genes and key pathways are reversed in mutation-corrected K562−28(A > G) cell line. (A) The correlation between K562 and K562−28(A > G) cell lines. (B) The upregulated and downregulated DEGs in K562, K562−28(A > G), and K562−28(A > G). (C) Differentially regulated signaling pathways in K562–28(A>G) compared to K562−28(A > G). (D) The recovery of key pathways.