| Literature DB >> 33193591 |
Jianchu Wang1, Wei Wang1, Qianli Tang1,2, Libai Lu1, Zongjiang Luo1, Wenchuan Li1, Yuan Lu1, Jian Pu1.
Abstract
Recent studies have investigated the modulatory roles of long non-coding RNAs in the onset and progression of liver cancer. The present study aimed to elucidate the role of lnc-GNAT1-1 in liver cancer development and to explore the underlying mechanisms. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to measure the expression levels of lnc-GNAT1-1 in cancerous tissues from patients with liver cancer and in liver cancer cell lines. The proliferative ability and apoptotic rates of liver cancer cells were measured using the counting kit-8 (CCK-8), colony formation, and flow cytometry assays. The abilities to invade and migrate were measured using Transwell assays. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and vimentin, were measured using western blotting. A nude mouse model was injected with xenografts to evaluate tumor growth in vivo. Downregulation of lnc-GNAT1-1 was observed in cancerous tissues from patients with liver cancer and in liver cancer cell lines, and low expression levels of lnc-GNAT1-1 were related to advanced TNM stage. Lnc-GNAT1-1 knockdown promoted invasion, migration, and proliferation of liver cancer cells and inhibited apoptosis, while lnc-GNAT1-1 upregulation exerted the opposite effects. The expression levels of lnc-GNAT1-1 negatively correlated with in vivo tumor growth in a xenograft nude mouse model. Mechanistic experiments revealed that lnc-GNAT1-1 exerted anti-tumor effects in liver cancer cells by inhibiting EMT. In conclusion, this study suggests that lnc-GNAT1-1 suppresses liver cancer progression by modulating EMT.Entities:
Keywords: EMT; anti-tumour; liver cancer; lnc-GNAT1-1; long non-coding RNA
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193591 PMCID: PMC7541952 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.01029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
FIGURE 1Downregulation of lnc-GNAT1-1 was observed in liver cancer tissues and cell lines. (A) Expression levels of lnc-GNAT1-1 in paired normal–cancer liver tissues. (B) Expression levels of lnc-GNAT1-1 in liver cancer tissues with various TNM stages. (C) Relative lnc-GNAT1-1 expression in liver cancer cell lines. *Significant differences compared with control groups are shown at P < 0.05. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate.
FIGURE 2Lnc-GNAT1-1 knockdown enhanced cell proliferative ability and inhibited apoptosis in SMMC-7721 liver cancer cells. (A) The expression levels of lnc-GNAT1-1 in SMMC-7721 cells after transfection with sh-lnc-GNAT1-1 or sh-NC. (B,C) Cell proliferative ability of SMMC-7721 cells after sh-lnc-GNAT1-1 or sh-NC transfection was examined by CCK-8 assay (B) and colony formation assay (C). (D) Cell apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometry. *Significant differences are shown as P < 0.05. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate.
FIGURE 3Lnc-GNAT1-1 silencing promoted the invasion and migration of SMMC-7721 liver cancer cells, while lnc-GNAT1-1 overexpression exerted an opposite effect in QGY-7703 cells. (A,B) Transwell assays were carried out to evaluate the ability to invade and migrate of SMMC-7721 cells after sh-lnc-GNAT1-1 or sh-NC transfection. (C,D) Transwell assays were carried out to evaluate the ability to invade and migrate of QGY-7703 cells after LV-lnc-GNAT1-1 or LV-NC transfection. *Significant differences are shown as P < 0.05. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate.
FIGURE 4Lnc-GNAT1-1 overexpression suppressed cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis in QGY-7703 liver cancer cells. (A) Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of lnc-GNAT1-1 expression levels in QGY-7703 cells after transfection with LV-lnc-GNAT1-1 or LV-NC. (B,C) Cell proliferative ability of QGY-7703 cells after LV-lnc-GNAT1-1 or LV-NC transfection was detected by CCK-8 assay (B) and colony formation assay (C). (D) Apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometry. *Significant differences are shown as P < 0.05. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate.
FIGURE 5Knockdown of lnc-GNAT1-1 promoted in vivo tumor growth of the xenograft model in nude mice, while lnc-GNAT1-1 overexpression exerted the opposite effect. The underlying mechanism may be that lnc-GNAT1-1 downregulated EMT. (A,B) Tumor volume changed in mice injected with SMMC-7721 cells after sh-lnc-GNAT1-1 or sh-NC transfection. (C,D) Tumor volume changed in mice injected with QGY-7703 cells after LV-lnc-GNAT1-1 or LV-NC transfection. (E) The expression levels of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and vimentin in QGY-7703 cells transfected with LV-lnc-GNAT1-1 or LV-NC and SMMC-7721 cells transfected with sh-lnc-GNAT1-1 or sh-NC. *Significant differences are shown as P < 0.05.