| Literature DB >> 33193135 |
Penghang Zhang1,2, Xiaoai Zhang1,2, Yuzhu Liu1,2, Jinru Jiang1,2, Zhangqi Shen3, Qian Chen1,2, Xiaochen Ma1,2.
Abstract
Campylobacter species are zoonotic pathogens and the leading cause of bacterial enteritis worldwide. With the increase of antimicrobial resistance to fluoroquinolones and macrolides, they have been identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as high-priority antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. There is currently little known about the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance characteristics of Campylobacter species in Beijing. In this study, we performed a 2-year surveillance of Campylobacter in Beijing, China. We used multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing to analyze 236 Campylobacter isolates recovered from 230 clinical infectious cases in Beijing between 2017 and 2018. The Campylobacter isolation rate in diarrhea patients was 7.81%, with higher isolation rates in male patients than female patients and in autumn compared with other seasons. We identified 125 sequence types (STs) of 23 cloning complexes (CCs) among the 236 isolates, including four new alleles and 19 new STs. The most commonly isolated STs of Campylobacter jejuni were ST-22 and ST-760 (4.50%), and the most commonly isolated ST of Campylobacter coli was ST-9227 (16.67%). We also compared our isolates with clinical Campylobacter isolates from other countries in Asia, CC-353 of Campylobacter coli was found in eight countries, CC-1034 and CC-1287 of Campylobacter coli were found only in China. All C. jejuni isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial. C. jejuni showed the highest rate of resistance toward ciprofloxacin (94.50%), followed by tetracycline (93.50%), and nalidixic acid (92.00%), while C. coli showed highest resistance toward ciprofloxacin (94.44%) and tetracycline (94.44%) followed by nalidixic acid (88.89%). The most commonly observed MDR combination of C. jejuni were quinolone, phenicol and tetracycline (11.50%), while the most commonly observed MDR combination of C. coli were macrolide, quinolone, phenicol, tetracycline and lincosamide (30.56%). Surveillance of molecular characterization will provide important information for prevention of Campylobacter infection. This study enhances insight into Campylobacter infections in diarrheal patients, with relevance for treatment regimens in Beijing.Entities:
Keywords: Campylobacter spp.; China; MLST; antimicrobial susceptibility; human
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193135 PMCID: PMC7604515 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.554784
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Description of the patients (230, total number of studied 2,945) included in this study.
| Epidemiological data | No. of cases (%) | No. of patients (percentage of isolation rate) | χ2 | P |
| 8.6054 | 0.0037 | |||
| Male | 148 (64.35%) | 148/1623 (9.12%) | ||
| Female | 82 (35.65%) | 82/1322 (6.20%) | ||
| 6.1753 | 0.0983 | |||
| Child | 1 (0.43%) | 1/29 (3.45%) | ||
| Adolescent | 12 (5.22%) | 12/102 (11.76%) | ||
| Adult | 196 (85.22%) | 196/2429 (8.07%) | ||
| Elderly | 21 (9.13%) | 21/385 (5.45%) | ||
| 11.0292 | 0.0116 | |||
| Spring | 51 (22.17%) | 51/682 (7.48%) | ||
| Summer | 86 (37.39%) | 86/1231 (6.99%) | ||
| Autumn | 82 (35.65%) | 82/799 (10.26%) | ||
| Winter | 11 (4.78%) | 11/233 (4.72%) |
FIGURE 1Phylogenetic analysis. Minimum spanning tree (MST) of MLST data of 200 C. jejuni human isolates collected in 2017 and 2018 in Beijing, China. Each color represents one clonal complex (CC). Isolates are represented by circles, and the size of the circle is proportional to the number of isolates. Branches and numbers represent allelic differences between isolates.
FIGURE 2Phylogenetic analysis. Minimum spanning tree (MST) of MLST data of 36 C. coli human isolates collected in 2017 and 2018 in Beijing, China. Green represents the ST-828 complex and red represents isolates that do not belong to any known clonal complex. Isolates are represented by circles, and the size of the circle is proportional to the number of isolates. Branches and numbers represent allelic differences between isolates.
FIGURE 3Dendrogram of MLST data of C. jejuni human isolates collected from this study and other district of China, Showed the number of differences in MLST alleles. The similarity coefficient were calculated using the categorical (difference) and complete linkage for the cluster analysis.
FIGURE 4Dendrogram of MLST data of C. coli human isolates collected from this study and other district of China, showed the number of differences in MLST alleles. The similarity coefficient were calculated using the categorical (difference) and complete linkage for the cluster analysis.
FIGURE 5Genetic relationships among the 200 clinical isolates C. jejuni in this study and 1,336 isolates C. jejuni from Asia in the pubmlst database (Data taken time: January 18, 2019). A minimum spanning tree was reconstructed based on CCs from this study and the MLST database. The size of circles is proportional to the number of isolates, and the sources of the isolates are colored as indicated. Shadow zones in different colors represent different clonal complexes.
FIGURE 6Genetic relationships among the 36 clinical isolates C. coli in this study and 118 isolates C. coli from Asia in the pubmlst database (Data taken time: January 18, 2019). A minimum spanning tree was reconstructed based on CCs from this study and the MLST database. The size of circles is proportional to the number of isolates, and the sources of isolates are colored as indicated. Shadow zones in different color represent different clonal complexes.
Resistance rates (percentages) and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of human Campylobacter spp. isolates in Beijng.
| Antibiotic | Resistance rate (%) | MIC (μg/mL) | |||
| Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | |||
| Erythromycin | 9.00 | <0.5–>64 | <0.5 | 4 | |
| Azithromycin | 13.00 | <0.5–>64 | <0.5 | 1 | |
| Nalidixic acid | 92.00 | <0.5–>64 | 32 | >64 | |
| Ciprofloxacin | 94.50 | <0.5–>64 | 32 | >64 | |
| Gentamicin | 13.00 | <0.5–>64 | <0.5 | 64 | |
| Streptomycin | 9.50 | <0.5–>64 | 1 | 4 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 12.00 | <0.5–>64 | 8 | 32 | |
| Florfenicol | 35.00 | <0.5–>64 | 4 | 16 | |
| Tetracycline | 93.50 | <0.5–>64 | >64 | >64 | |
| Telithromycin | 12.00 | <0.25–>32 | 1 | 8 | |
| Clindamycin | 33.50 | <0.25–>32 | 0.5 | 1 | |
| Erythromycin | 44.44 | <0.5–>64 | 4 | >64 | |
| Azithromycin | 44.44 | <0.5–>64 | <0.5 | >64 | |
| Nalidixic acid | 88.89 | 4–>64 | >64 | >64 | |
| Ciprofloxacin | 94.44 | <0.5–>64 | 16 | >64 | |
| Gentamicin | 50.00 | <0.5–>64 | 2 | >64 | |
| Streptomycin | 72.22 | <0.5–>64 | 64 | >64 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 0.00 | 1–16 | 8 | 16 | |
| Florfenicol | 16.67 | <0.5–16 | 4 | 8 | |
| Tetracycline | 94.44 | 1–>64 | >64 | >64 | |
| Telithromycin | 63.89 | <0.25–>32 | 8 | >32 | |
| Clindamycin | 44.44 | <0.25–>32 | 1 | >32 | |