Literature DB >> 33192004

Factors affecting quality of life after pelvic fracture.

Vishal Verma1, Ramesh Kumar Sen2, Sujit Kumar Tripathy3, Sameer Aggarwal1, Suresh Sharma4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after pelvis fracture is suboptimal; majority of the patients do not return to their preinjury activities. Many researchers reported that late morbidity in pelvis fracture is associated with severity of the fracture, associated trauma, pelvic fracture-related complications and methods of treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients with pelvis fracture who were treated either conservatively (n = 88) or surgically (n = 24) with a minimum of two years follow up were evaluated clinically and radiologically. The clinical outcome was evaluated using Majeed score and self-reported Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Their HRQOL was evaluated using the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) and WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires. The fracture-displacement in the anterior or posterior pelvis ring was measured from the anteroposterior radiograph or inlet/outlet view.
RESULTS: The average Majeed score was 76.65 ± 14.73 (range, 36 to 96). There were 81 patients with good to excellent outcomes and 31 patients with poor to fair outcomes. The average SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score was 47.71 ± 7.88 (range, 27.3 to 61.5) and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) was 49.20 ± 9.37 (range, 23.1 to 56.8). The functional level of the general population in the physical and mental domain was achieved in 48.23% and 65.3% of pelvic-fractured patients respectively. General population norms were achieved in 56.3%, 63.4%, 65.2% and 84.8% of patients in WHOQOL-BREF domain one, two, three and four respectively. The patients had significantly worse functional outcome and HRQOL if residual displacement was > 1 cm. Age, sex, associated injuries and injury mechanism were not affecting the HRQOL in patients with acceptable residual displacement of ≤ 1 cm.
CONCLUSION: Pelvic fracture with the residual displacement of ≤ 1 cm in the sacroiliac joint/symphysis pubis result in better functional outcome and HRQOL. Injury mechanism and associated injury have no impact on the HRQOL if the residual displacement is within the acceptable limit.
© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health-related quality of life; Majeed score; Orthopedic trauma; Pelvis; SF-36; WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires

Year:  2020        PMID: 33192004      PMCID: PMC7656473          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  38 in total

Review 1.  Reporting and interpretation of the functional outcomes after the surgical treatment of disruptions of the pelvic ring: a systematic review.

Authors:  K A Lefaivre; G P Slobogean; J Valeriote; P J O'Brien; S A Macadam
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-04

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Outcome after fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries.

Authors:  J D Cole; D A Blum; L J Ansel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism in Indian patients sustaining pelvi-acetabular injury.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumar Sen; Amit Kumar; Sujit Kumar Tripathy; Sameer Aggarwal; N Khandelwal; Sakthivel R R Manoharan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Vertical shear injuries: is there a relationship between residual displacement and functional outcome?

Authors:  J V Nepola; S W Trenhaile; M A Miranda; S L Butterfield; D C Fredericks; B L Riemer
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-06

6.  Outcome after pelvic ring injuries.

Authors:  T Pohlemann; A Gänsslen; O Schellwald; U Culemann; H Tscherne
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Health-related quality of life and life satisfaction in patients following surgically treated pelvic ring fractures. A prospective observational study with two years follow-up.

Authors:  Tomas Borg; Per Berg; Kerstin Fugl-Meyer; Sune Larsson
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  What are predictors for patients' quality of life after pelvic ring fractures?

Authors:  Joerg H Holstein; Antonius Pizanis; Daniel Köhler; Tim Pohlemann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Prognostic factors and quality of life after pelvic fractures. The Brabant Injury Outcome Surveillance (BIOS) study.

Authors:  L Brouwers; M A C de Jongh; L de Munter; M Edwards; K W W Lansink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Long-term physical functioning and quality of life after pelvic ring injuries.

Authors:  H Banierink; I H F Reininga; E Heineman; K W Wendt; K Ten Duis; F F A IJpma
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.