Literature DB >> 33187967

The Role of Gallstones in Gallbladder Cancer in India: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Sharayu Mhatre1,2, Rebecca C Richmond3,4, Caroline L Relton3,4, Rajesh P Dikshit1,2, Nilanjan Chatterjee5,6,7, Preetha Rajaraman8, Zhaoming Wang9,10, Haoyu Zhang11, Rajendra Badwe2,12, Mahesh Goel2,12, Shraddha Patkar2,12, Shailesh V Shrikhande2,13, Prachi S Patil2,14, George Davey Smith3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Past history of gallstones is associated with increased risk of gallbladder cancer in observational studies. We conducted complementary observational and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to determine whether history of gallstones is causally related to development of gallbladder cancer in an Indian population.
METHODS: To investigate associations between history of gallstones and gallbladder cancer, we used questionnaire and imaging data from a gallbladder cancer case-control study conducted at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (cases = 1,170; controls = 2,525). We then used 26 genetic variants identified in a genome-wide association study of 27,174 gallstone cases and 736,838 controls of European ancestry in an MR approach to assess causality. The association of these genetic variants with both gallstones and gallbladder cancer was examined in the gallbladder cancer case-control study. Various complementary MR approaches were used to evaluate the robustness of our results in the presence of pleiotropy and heterogeneity, and to consider the suitability of the selected SNPs as genetic instruments for gallstones in an Indian population.
RESULTS: We found a strong observational association between gallstones and gallbladder cancer using self-reported history of gallstones [OR = 4.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.5-5.8] and with objective measures of gallstone presence using imaging techniques (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.5-2.7). We found consistent causal estimates across all MR techniques, with ORs for gallbladder cancer in the range of 1.3-1.6.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a causal relationship between history of gallstones and increased risk of gallbladder cancer, albeit of a smaller magnitude than those found in observational analysis. IMPACT: Our findings emphasize the importance of gallstone treatment for preventing gallbladder cancer in high-risk individuals. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33187967      PMCID: PMC7611244          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  36 in total

1.  Long-term statin use and the risk of gallstone disease: A population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Rune Erichsen; Trine Frøslev; Timothy L Lash; Lars Pedersen; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A 24-year controlled follow-up of patients with silent gallstones showed no long-term risk of symptoms or adverse events leading to cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Malte Schmidt; Trygve Hausken; Inge Glambek; Christoph Schleer; Geir Egil Eide; Karl Søndenaa
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Association Between Screen-Detected Gallstone Disease and Cancer in a Cohort Study.

Authors:  Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh; Lars Tue Sørensen; Torben Jørgensen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Statin use and risk of gallstone disease followed by cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Michael Bodmer; Yolanda B Brauchli; Stephan Krähenbühl; Susan S Jick; Christoph R Meier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  George Davey Smith; Gibran Hemani
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Jeremy A Labrecque
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Bryan N Howie; Peter Donnelly; Jonathan Marchini
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; George Davey Smith; Philip C Haycock; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 10.  A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Dylan S Small; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.021

View more
  2 in total

1.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Veronika W Skrivankova; Rebecca C Richmond; Benjamin A R Woolf; Neil M Davies; Sonja A Swanson; Tyler J VanderWeele; Nicholas J Timpson; Julian P T Higgins; Niki Dimou; Claudia Langenberg; Elizabeth W Loder; Robert M Golub; Matthias Egger; George Davey Smith; J Brent Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-10-26

2.  Examination on the risk factors of cholangiocarcinoma: A Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Lanlan Chen; Zhongqi Fan; Xiaodong Sun; Wei Qiu; Wentao Mu; Kaiyuan Chai; Yannan Cao; Guangyi Wang; Guoyue Lv
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 5.988

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.