| Literature DB >> 33187371 |
Raluca Maria Pop1, Ioana Corina Bocsan1, Anca Dana Buzoianu1, Veronica Sanda Chedea2, Sonia Ancuța Socaci3, Michela Pecoraro4, Ada Popolo4.
Abstract
Natural products black cumin-Nigella sativa (N. sativa) and wild garlic-Allium ursinum (AU) are known for their potential role in reducing cardiovascular risk factors, including antracycline chemotherapy. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of N. sativa and AU water and methanolic extracts in a cellular model of doxorubicin (doxo)-induced cardiotoxicity. The extracts were characterized using Ultraviolet-visible (UV-VIS) spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, Liquid Chromatography coupled with Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) and Gas Chromatography coupled with Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) techniques. Antioxidant activity was evaluated on H9c2 cells. Cytosolic and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) release was evaluated using 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin-diacetate (DHCF-DA) and mitochondria-targeted superoxide indicator (MitoSOX red), respectively. Mitochondrial membrane depolarization was evaluated by flow cytometry. LC-MS analysis identified 12 and 10 phenolic compounds in NSS and AU extracts, respectively, with flavonols as predominant compounds. FT-IR analysis identified the presence of carbohydrates, amino acids and lipids in both plants. GC-MS identified the sulfur compounds in the AU water extract. N. sativa seeds (NSS) methanolic extract had the highest antioxidant activity reducing both intracellular and mitochondrial ROS release. All extracts (excepting AU methanolic extract) preserved H9c2 cells viability. None of the investigated plants affected the mitochondrial membrane depolarization. N. sativa and AU are important sources of bioactive compounds with increased antioxidant activities, requiring different extraction solvents to obtain the pharmacological effects.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; black cumin; cardiotoxicity; phenolic compounds; wild garlic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33187371 PMCID: PMC7697550 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of NSS and AU samples.
| Samples | TPC | DPPH |
|---|---|---|
| NSS_W | 1.80 ± 0.06 | 297.30 ± 1.27 |
| NSS_MeOH | 2.23 ± 0.13 | 488.37 ± 1.20 |
| AU_W | 2.46 ± 0.12 | 158.47 ± 1.55 |
| AU_MeOH | 2.70 ± 0.08 | 312.15 ± 1.26 |
Abbreviations: TPC—Total Polyphenol Content; GAE—gallic acid equivalents; DPPH—2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate; DW—dry weight; T—Trolox equivalents per gram of dry plant material.
Figure 1Allium ursinum (A.U)- and Nigella sativa seed (NSS) general FTIR spectra (500–3500 cm−1) (a) and fingerprint region (800–1800 cm−1) (b).
Tentative identification, characterization and concentration of major compounds identified in Nigella sativa seeds water and methanolic extracts.
| No | Time | M/[M + H]+ | λmax (nm) | Tentative Identification | Concentration | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSS_W | NSS_MeOH | ||||||
| 1 | 2.95 | 224 | 275 | Sinapic acid | 14.28 ± 0.09 | 8.56 ± 0.07 | [ |
| 2 | 4.07 | 138 | 270 | Hydroxybenzoic acid | 4.17 ± 0.05 | 2.43 ± 0.06 | [ |
| 3 | 7.87 | 792 | 290 | Unknown | 3.88 ± 0.05 | 2.54 ± 0.06 | - |
| 4 | 10.23 | 432 | 298 | Benzyl alcohol dihexoside | 6.38 ± 0.04 | 5.12 ± 0.06 | [ |
| 5 | 12.66 | 198 | 278, 320 | Syringic acid | 5.21 ± 0.08 | 4.78 ± 0.11 | [ |
| 6 | 13.5 | 196 | 295 | Damascenine | 2.18 ± 0.06 | 2.24 ± 0.07 | [ |
| 7 | 13.95 | 342 | 278, 300 | Norargemonine | 3.61 ± 0.06 | 8.89 ± 0.05 | [ |
| 8 | 14.27 | 772 | 270, 350 | Quercetin-rhamnosyl-diglucopyranoside | 4.76 ± 0.03 | 6.00 ± 0.04 | [ |
| 9 | 16.39 | 594 | 265, 335 | Kaempferol-rhamnosyl-diglucoside | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.82 ± 0.05 | [ |
| 10 | 17.14 | 755 | 265, 355 | Kaempferol-rhamnosyl- | 1.57 ± 0.06 | 3.27 ± 0.05 | [ |
| 11 | 21.21 | 474 | 260, 300 | Thymol-sophoroside | 2.13 ± 0.05 | 1.62 ± 0.10 | [ |
| 12 | 23.25 | 286 | 260, 353 | Kaempferol | 1.60 ± 0.05 | 4.96 ± 0.13 | [ |
| 13 | 24.98 | 150 | 260 | Thymol | 1.36 ± 0.07 | 5.09 ± 0.06 | [ |
Tentative identification, characterization and concentration of major compounds identified in Allium ursinum water and methanolic extracts.
| No | Time | M/[M + H]+ | λmax (nm) | Tentative Identification | Concentration | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU_W | AU_MeOH | ||||||
| 1 | 2.99 | 164 | 217, 280 | Coumaric acid | 44.49 ± 0.02 | 39.64 ± 0.07 | [ |
| 2 | 3.11 | 194 | 218, 295 | Ferulic acid | 11.97 ± 0.03 | 16.08 ± 0.04 | [ |
| 3 | 3.19 | 224 | 238, 326 | Sinapic acid | 12.53 ± 0.03 | 13.78 ± 0.03 | [ |
| 4 | 4.06 | 298 | 270 | Unknown | 17.26 ± 0.03 | 18.68 ± 0.06 | - |
| 5 | 11.37 | 756 | 265, 355 | Kaempferol-glucosyl-rhamnosyl-glucoside | 4.17 ± 0.04 | 9.03 ± 0.03 | - |
| 6 | 12.67 | 448 | 264, 350 | Kaempferol-glucopyranoside | 8.34 ± 0.04 | 6.48 ± 0.04 | [ |
| 7 | 14.63 | 540 | 230, 267, 320 | Unknown | 9.97 ± 0.02 | 20.87 ± 0.05 | - |
| 8 | 15.73 | 490 | 260, 330 | Kaempferol-acetylglucoside | 6.02 ± 0.04 | 12.78 ± 0.05 | [ |
| 9 | 16.14 | 903 | 265, 315 | Kaempferol-deoxyhexose-hexoside -p-coumaroyl hexoside derivative | 6.15 ± 0.04 | 15.46 ± 0.02 | [ |
| 10 | 17.24 | 448 | 267, 362 | Kaemferol-glucoside | 9.98 ± 0.02 | 9.16 ± 0.09 | [ |
| 11 | 20.81 | 491 | 266, 330 | Kaempferol glucosyl-acetate | 1.31 ± 0.04 | 3.25 ± 0.07 | [ |
| 12 | 23.30 | 286 | 265, 365 | Kaempferol | 2.39 ± 0.03 | 4.86 ± 0.07 | [ |
Tentative identification of major compounds identified in Nigella sativa seeds comparative with Nigella sativa seeds water and methanolic extracts.
| No | Time | Tentative Identification | Concentration | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSS | NSS_W | NSS_MeOH | |||
| 1 | 7.65 | α-Thujene | 954.94 | 803.33 | 41.21 |
| 2 | 7.89 | α-Pinene | 178.19 | 150.59 | 2.09 |
| 3 | 8.25 | Bicyclo [3.1.0]hex-2-ene, 4-methylene-1-(1-methylethyl) | 1.50 | - | - |
| 4 | 8.47 | Camphene | 2.43 | - | - |
| 5 | 9.28 | Sabinene | 87.79 | 40.78 | 7.18 |
| 6 | 9.46 | β-Pinene | 147.32 | 88.79 | 12.67 |
| 7 | 9.88 | β-Myrcene | 5.34 | 0.73 | - |
| 8 | 10.43 | n.i. | 1.35 | - | |
| 9 | 10.52 | α-Phellandrene | 3.83 | - | - |
| 10 | 10.91 | α-Terpinene | 30.93 | 13.07 | 2.68 |
| 11 | 11.24 | p-Cymene | 1707.59 | 715.18 | 289.50 |
| 12 | 11.38 | D-Limonene | 108.43 | 57.03 | 14.79 |
| 13 | 12.49 | γ-Terpinene | 70.89 | 28.28 | 14.77 |
| 14 | 13.54 | Terpinolene | 6.28 | 1.38 | - |
| 15 | 13.75 | n.i. | 0.73 | - | - |
| 16 | 13.94 | n.i. | 10.36 | - | 2.40 |
| 17 | 14.82 | n.i. | 39.07 | 1.46 | 12.11 |
| 18 | 17.23 | 1-Terpinen-4-ol | 0.83 | - | 1.63 |
| 19 | 17.57 | 1-Undecene | - | - | 4–35 |
| 20 | 17.96 | n.i. | - | - | 2.19 |
| 21 | 19.80 | Thymoquinone | 124.80 | 1.49 | 111.35 |
| 22 | 21.53 | Thymol | - | - | 8.32 |
| 23 | 23.46 | α-Longipinene | 1.09 | 2.12 | 1.05 |
| 24 | 24.85 | 1-Dodecanol | - | - | 3.50 |
| 25 | 25.55 | 1,4-Methanoazulene, decahydro-4,8,8-trimethyl-9-methylene-,[1S-(1-α.,3a-β,4-α,8a-β)]- | 4.90 | 8.79 | 7.77 |
Tentative identification of major compounds identified in Allium ursinum comparative with Allium ursinum water and methanolic extracts.
| No | Time | Tentative Identification | Concentration | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU | AU_W | AU_MeOH | |||
| 1 | 4.15 | Hexanal | 1.07 | - | - |
| 2 | 5.54 | Allyl monosulfide | - | 1.02 | - |
| 3 | 7.26 | Disulfide, methyl 2-propenyl | - | 11.25 | - |
| 4 | 7.64 | α-Thujene | 5.18 | 0.85 | - |
| 5 | 7.89 | α-Pinene | 5.65 | 1.76 | - |
| 6 | 8.47 | Camphene | 2.36 | - | - |
| 7 | 8.89 | Benzaldehyde | - | 0.49 | - |
| 8 | 9.091 | Dimethyl trisulfide | - | 11.07 | - |
| 9 | 9.28 | Sabinene | 1.07 | - | - |
| 10 | 9.46 | β-Pinene | 1.54 | - | - |
| 11 | 9.89 | β-Myrcene | 3.049 | 2.59 | - |
| 12 | 11.21 | p-Cymene | 20.46 | 4.13 | - |
| 13 | 11.37 | 5.81 | 6.23 | - | |
| 14 | 11.50 | n.i. | 1.09 | 1.21 | - |
| 15 | 12.76 | Acetophenone | - | - | 0.87 |
| 16 | 15.53 | Trisulfide, methyl 2-propenyl | - | 3.49 | - |
| 17 | 16.29 | Benzoic Acid | 1.30 | - | 0.13 |
| 18 | 16.78 | Benzoic acid, ethyl ester | - | - | 1.76 |
| 19 | 17.57 | 1-Dodecene | - | - | 7.52 |
| 20 | 18.49 | Tetrasulfide, dimethyl | - | 0.84 | - |
| 21 | 24.86 | 3-Hexadecene, ( | - | - | 13.24 |
| 22 | 25.56 | n.i. | 0.55 | - | - |
| 23 | 31.04 | 1-Pentadecene | - | - | 15.33 |
| 24 | 34.08 | 1-Heptadecene | - | - | 2.94 |
Figure 2Effects of NSS and AU extracts on H9c2 cell viability. NSS and AU extracts (50 µg/mL) were administered alone for 24 h or 4 h before doxo (1 µM). Cellular viability was assessed by MTT assay. Data are reported as mean ± SD of three independent experiments (N = 6). Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance test (ANOVA), and multiple comparisons were made by Bonferroni’s test. ** p < 0.005 vs. ctrl; °° p < 0.005 and °°° p < 0.001 vs. doxo.
Figure 3Effect of NSS and AU extracts on doxo-induced ROS release. NSS and AU extracts (50 µg/mL) were administered alone for 24 h or 4 h before doxo (1 µM). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation was evaluated using the probe dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA) in H9c2 cells. ROS production was expressed as the mean ± SD of the percentage of DCF positive cells of at least three independent experiments (N = 6). Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance test (ANOVA), and multiple comparisons were made by Bonferroni’s test. ** p < 0.005 vs. ctrl; °° p < 0.005 and vs. doxo.
Figure 4Effect of NSS and AU extracts on doxo-induced mitochondrial ROS release. NSS and AU extracts (50 µg/mL) were administered alone for 24 h or 4 h before doxo (1 µM). ROS formation was evaluated using the probe MitoSOX red in H9c2 cells. Mitochondrial superoxide production was expressed as mean ± SD of the percentage of MitoSOX positive cells of at least three independent experiments (N = 6). Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance test (ANOVA), and multiple comparisons were made by Bonferroni’s test. *** p < 0.001 vs. ctrl; ° p < 0.05 and °° p < 0.005 and vs. doxo.
Figure 5Effect of NSS and AU extracts on doxo-induced mitochondrial membrane depolarization. NSS and AU extracts (50 µg/mL) were administered alone for 24 h or 4 h before doxo (1 µM). The mitochondrial membrane potential was evaluated by flow cytometry analysis with Tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester (TMRE), a cell-permeant, positively-charged, red-orange dye which penetrates and accumulates in the mitochondria in inverse proportion to the membrane potential. The low value of percentage of TMRE+ cells means that the TMRE dye was not trapped in the mitochondrial membrane due to its depolarization. Data were expressed as mean ± SD of fluorescence intensity of at least three independent experiments (N = 6).