| Literature DB >> 33187061 |
Linglong Ye1,2, Jian Xiao3, Ya Fang4.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the heterogeneous trajectory classes of social engagement among older adults in China and examine sex differences to determine how sociodemographic characteristics and health status impact these trajectory classes. A sample of 8117 participants aged ≥65 years from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey was included. Growth mixture modeling was conducted to estimate the trajectory classes of social engagement. Logistic regression was adopted to analyze the associations between individual characteristics and trajectory classes. Three trajectory classes of social engagement were identified: the high-decline (35.3%), medium-decline (57.6%), and low-increase (7.1%). Men were less likely to be in the medium-decline and low-increase classes than women. Older men benefited from economic factors more than women. Education exhibited a stronger protective effect on the high-decline class for older women. High physical functioning might enable older adults with the lowest initial level of social engagement to make efforts to engage in social activities, which was stronger for older men than women. For both men and women, a proper cognitive state and positive emotions were in favor of social engagement. These findings are valuable for achieving sex equity in social engagement development for healthy and active aging.Entities:
Keywords: aging; heterogeneity; sex differences; social engagement trajectory
Year: 2020 PMID: 33187061 PMCID: PMC7696123 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Baseline characteristics of older adults and their sex differences.
| Variables |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % or Mean (SD) | % or Mean (SD) | % or Mean (SD) | ||
| Social engagement (0–5) | 3.4 (1.0) | 3.7 (1.0) | 3.1 (0.9) | <0.001 |
| Marital status (ref: Unmarried) | ||||
| Married | 39.5 | 57.1 | 24.9 | <0.001 |
| Living arrangement (ref: Alone) | ||||
| With people | 86.1 | 89.1 | 83.7 | <0.001 |
| Available of help (ref: No) | ||||
| Yes | 97.0 | 97.2 | 96.8 | <0.050 |
| Available of confidant (ref: No) | ||||
| Yes | 93.8 | 94.7 | 93.0 | <0.001 |
| Social activities (ref: No) | ||||
| Yes | 20.9 | 27.9 | 15.0 | <0.001 |
| Sociodemographic | ||||
| Age (ref: 65–74) | ||||
| 75–84 | 29.6 | 32.9 | 26.8 | <0.001 |
| 85+ | 39.3 | 31.9 | 45.4 | |
| Ethnicity (ref: Minority) | ||||
| Han | 93.6 | 94.4 | 93.0 | <0.001 |
| Occupational status (ref: Low level) | ||||
| High level | 10.6 | 18.8 | 3.8 | <0.001 |
| Education years (ref: 0) | ||||
| 1–5 | 25.8 | 40.3 | 13.8 | <0.001 |
| 6–9 | 10.7 | 18.4 | 4.3 | |
| 10+ | 5.7 | 10.2 | 2.1 | |
| Residence (ref: Rural) | ||||
| Urban | 43.9 | 43.7 | 44.1 | 0.52 |
| Region (ref: Eastern China) | ||||
| Central China | 25.2 | 24.4 | 25.9 | <0.001 |
| Western China | 44.6 | 45.8 | 43.6 | |
| Sufficient financial support (ref: No) | ||||
| Yes | 80.6 | 82.8 | 78.8 | <0.001 |
| Pension (ref: No) | ||||
| Yes | 22.0 | 34.4 | 11.8 | <0.001 |
| Health status | ||||
| ADL (0–5) | 0.3 (1.0) | 0.2 (0.8) | 0.4 (1.1) | <0.001 |
| Chronic disease numbers (0–11) | 0.5 (0.8) | 0.5 (0.8) | 0.5 (0.7) | <0.001 |
| MMSE score (0–30) | 24.7 (6.9) | 26.3 (5.7) | 23.4 (7.4) | <0.001 |
| Positive emotions (0–12) | 8.3 (2.4) | 8.8 (2.3) | 8.0 (2.4) | <0.001 |
Note: SD = standard deviation; MMSE = mini-mental state examination; ADL = activities of daily living; ref = reference. 1 p values based on chi-squared tests (for categorical variables), and nonparametric Wilcoxon rank–sum tests (for continuous variables).
Performance of latent class growth models and growth mixture models.
| Model | Indices | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SABIC | Entropy | VLMR-LRT | BLRT | Smallest Class | |
| LCGM | |||||
| 2-class LCGM | 60,243.5 | 0.77 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 36% |
| 3-class LCGM | 58,701.3 | 0.81 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 8% |
| 4-class LCGM | 58,245.0 | 0.80 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 5% |
| 5-class LCGM | 57,974.7 | 0.76 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 2% |
| GMM | |||||
| 3-class GMM | 58,180.5 | 0.78 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 7% |
Note: SABIC = sample-size adjusted Bayesian information criteria; VLMR-LRT = Vuong–Lo–Mendell–Rubin likelihood ratio test; BLRT = bootstrapped likelihood ratio test; LCGM = latent class growth modeling; GMM = growth mixture modeling.
Figure 1Heterogeneous trajectory classes of social engagement.
Associations of baseline characteristics with social engagement trajectory classes among older adults by univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
| Variables | MD vs. HD ( | LI vs. HD ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude OR (95%CI) | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | Crude OR (95%CI) | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | |
| Sociodemographic characteristics | ||||
| Sex (ref: Woman) | ||||
| Man | 0.25 (0.23–0.28) *** | 0.32 (0.27–0.36) *** | 0.23 (0.19–0.28) *** | 0.30 (0.23–0.38) *** |
| Age (ref: 65–74) | ||||
| 75–84 | 2.75 (2.44–3.10) *** | 2.87 (2.51–3.27) *** | 2.49 (1.96–3.15) *** | 2.39 (1.84–3.09) *** |
| 85+ | 12.31 (10.75–14.09) *** | 10.02 (8.56–11.74) *** | 7.64 (6.02–9.69) *** | 6.66 (4.99–8.87) *** |
| Ethnicity (ref: Minority) | ||||
| Han | 0.54 (0.44–0.67) *** | 0.55 (0.42–0.71) *** | 0.97 (0.63–1.49) | 1.20 (0.72–2.01) |
| Occupational status (ref: Low level) | ||||
| High level | 0.30 (0.26–0.35) *** | 0.81 (0.65–1.02) | 0.22 (0.15–0.32) *** | 0.59 (0.34–1.01) |
| Education years (ref: 0) | ||||
| 1–5 | 0.38 (0.34–0.42) *** | 0.89 (0.77–1.03) | 0.32 (0.26–0.40) *** | 0.79 (0.60–1.04) |
| 6–9 | 0.25 (0.22–0.29) *** | 1.00 (0.82–1.22) | 0.19 (0.13–0.27) *** | 0.96 (0.62–1.48) |
| 10+ | 0.22 (0.18–0.27) *** | 1.00 (0.74–1.34) | 0.24 (0.15–0.37) *** | 1.75 (0.95–3.25) |
| Residence (ref: Rural) | ||||
| Urban | 0.93 (0.85–1.02) | 1.27 (1.11–1.44) *** | 0.70 (0.58–0.84) *** | 1.21 (0.95–1.54) |
| Region (ref: Eastern China) | ||||
| Central China | 1.00 (0.88–1.14) | 1.11 (0.95–1.30) | 1.00 (0.79–1.26) | 0.87 (0.65–1.15) |
| Western China | 0.83 (0.74–0.92) *** | 0.93 (0.81–1.07) | 0.70 (0.57–0.87) ** | 0.77 (0.60–0.99) * |
| Sufficient financial support (ref: No) | ||||
| Yes | 0.72 (0.64–0.82) *** | 0.94 (0.81–1.09) | 0.33 (0.27–0.41) *** | 0.54 (0.42–0.68) *** |
| Pension (ref: No) | ||||
| Yes | 0.30 (0.27–0.33) *** | 0.53 (0.45–0.62) *** | 0.23 (0.18–0.30) *** | 0.46 (0.32–0.65) *** |
| Health status | ||||
| ADL (0–6) | 1.67 (1.54–1.81) *** | 1.04 (0.96–1.13) | 1.28 (1.15–1.42) *** | 0.80 (0.70–0.93) ** |
| Chronic disease numbers (0–11) | 0.88 (0.83–0.94) *** | 1.02 (0.94–1.10) | 0.98 (0.87–1.10) | 1.13 (0.98–1.30) |
| MMSE score (0–30) | 0.87 (0.86–0.88) *** | 0.97 (0.95–0.98) *** | 0.89 (0.87–0.90) *** | 0.95 (0.93–0.97) *** |
| Positive emotions (0–12) | 0.85 (0.83–0.87) *** | 0.91 (0.89–0.94) *** | 0.75 (0.72–0.78) *** | 0.84 (0.80–0.88) *** |
Note: OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; MD = “medium-decline”; HD = “high-decline”; LI = “low-increase”; MMSE = mini-mental state examination; ADL = activities of daily living; ref = reference; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Sex differences in the associations between baseline characteristics and social engagement trajectory classes among older adults by univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
| Variables | Man ( | Woman ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD vs. HD | LI vs. HD | MD vs. HD | LI vs. HD | |||||
| Crude OR | Adjusted | Crude OR (95%CI) | Adjusted | Crude OR (95%CI) | Adjusted | Crude OR (95%CI) | Adjusted | |
| Sociodemographic characteristics | ||||||||
| Age (ref: 65–74) | ||||||||
| 75–84 | 3.23 (2.69–3.86) *** | 3.17 (2.63–3.83) *** | 2.15 (1.46–3.17) *** | 2.07 (1.38–3.10) *** | 2.84 (2.38–3.39) *** | 2.52 (2.09–3.03) *** | 3.04 (2.22–4.14) *** | 2.55 (1.83–3.55) *** |
| 85+ | 10.05 (8.31–12.16) | 8.81 (7.15–10.85) *** | 4.74 (3.21–6.99) *** | 4.02 (2.60–6.22) *** | 20.14 (15.80–25.65) *** | 13.69 (10.45–17.94) *** | 14.22 (10.10–20.00) *** | 10.20 (6.85–15.18) *** |
| Ethnicity (ref: Minority) | ||||||||
| Han | 0.51 (0.38–0.69) *** | 0.43 (0.30–0.61) *** | 0.81 (0.40–1.65) | 1.02 (0.46–2.24) | 0.63 (0.46–0.86) ** | 0.73 (0.51–1.05) | 1.18 (0.67–2.08) | 1.37 (0.70–2.69) |
| Occupational status (ref: Low level) | ||||||||
| High level | 0.45 (0.38–0.54) *** | 0.75 (0.58–0.96) * | 0.34 (0.21–0.56) *** | 0.70 (0.37–1.33) | 0.44 (0.32–0.61) *** | 1.24 (0.75–2.04) | 0.32 (0.16–0.66) ** | 0.51 (0.17–1.57) |
| Education years (ref: 0) | ||||||||
| 1–5 | 0.66 (0.56–0.78) *** | 0.89 (0.75–1.07) | 0.60 (0.42–0.85) ** | 0.99 (0.67–1.46) | 0.53 (0.44–0.65) *** | 0.90 (0.72–1.14) | 0.44 (0.31–0.64) *** | 0.58 (0.38–0.90) * |
| 6–9 | 0.48 (0.40–0.59) *** | 1.05 (0.83–1.34) | 0.45 (0.29–0.72) *** | 1.38 (0.81–2.35) | 0.32 (0.24–0.43) *** | 0.74 (0.51–1.09) | 0.14 (0.06–0.33) *** | 0.35 (0.14–0.89) * |
| 10+ | 0.42 (0.33–0.54) *** | 1.16 (0.83–1.61) | 0.47 (0.27–0.82) ** | 2.47 (1.18–5.15) * | 0.33 (0.21–0.51) *** | 0.48 (0.25–0.93) * | 0.37(0.16–0.84) * | 0.89 (0.26–3.08) |
| Residence (ref: Rural) | ||||||||
| Urban | 0.84 (0.73–0.96) ** | 1.29 (1.08–1.54) ** | 0.57 (0.41–0.78) *** | 1.14 (0.77–1.69) | 1.03 (0.89–1.19) | 1.26 (1.04–1.53) * | 0.80 (0.63–1.02) | 1.30 (0.94–1.79) |
| Region (ref: Eastern China) | ||||||||
| Central China | 1.06 (0.89–1.27) | 1.29 (1.05–1.60) * | 0.68 (0.45–1.03) | 0.77 (0.48–1.22) | 0.94 (0.77–1.15) | 0.93 (0.73–1.17) | 1.12 (0.82–1.52) | 0.87 (0.60–1.28) |
| Western China | 0.86 (0.73–1.00) | 0.99 (0.82–1.20) | 0.70 (0.50–0.99) * | 0.76 (0.52–1.12) | 0.80 (0.68–0.95) * | 0.87 (0.70–1.07) | 0.69 (0.52–0.92) * | 0.78 (0.55–1.10) |
| Sufficient financial support (ref: No) | ||||||||
| Yes | 0.75 (0.62–0.89) ** | 1.00 (0.81–1.24) | 0.34 (0.24–0.47) *** | 0.57 (0.39–0.83) ** | 0.78 (0.64–0.94) ** | 0.88 (0.70–1.09) | 0.36 (0.28–0.47) *** | 0.51 (0.36–0.70) *** |
| Pension (ref: No) | ||||||||
| Yes | 0.46 (0.40–0.53) *** | 0.51 (0.42–0.63) *** | 0.27 (0.18–0.40) *** | 0.32 (0.19–0.55) *** | 0.34 (0.28–0.41) *** | 0.60 (0.45–0.79) *** | 0.35 (0.24–0.51) *** | 0.79 (0.48–1.30) |
| Health status | ||||||||
| ADL (0–6) | 1.37 (1.24–1.52) *** | 1.03 (0.92–1.15) | 1.04 (0.82–1.32) | 0.75 (0.56–0.99) * | 1.83 (1.59–2.10) *** | 1.03 (0.90–1.18) | 1.36 (1.17–1.57) *** | 0.79 (0.65–0.95) * |
| Chronic disease numbers (0–11) | 0.86 (0.79–0.95) ** | 0.97 (0.88–1.08) | 0.94 (0.77–1.15) | 1.05 (0.84–1.31) | 0.93 (0.84–1.02) | 1.08 (0.96–1.22) | 1.04 (0.89–1.21) | 1.18 (0.98–1.43) |
| MMSE score (0–30) | 0.91 (0.90–0.92) *** | 0.98 (0.96–0.99) ** | 0.93 (0.91–0.95) *** | 0.97 (0.94–1.00) * | 0.86 (0.85–0.88) *** | 0.95 (0.94–0.97) *** | 0.86 (0.84–0.88) *** | 0.93 (0.91–0.96) *** |
| Positive emotions (0–12) | 0.87 (0.84–0.90) *** | 0.91 (0.87–0.94) *** | 0.76 (0.71–0.82) *** | 0.81 (0.75–0.87) *** | 0.88 (0.85–0.91) *** | 0.92 (0.88–0.95) *** | 0.78 (0.74–0.83) *** | 0.84 (0.79–0.90) *** |
Note: OR = odds ratios; CI = confidence interval. MD = “medium-decline”; HD = “high-decline”; LI = “low-increase”; MMSE = mini-mental state examination; ADL = activities of daily living; ref = reference. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.