Literature DB >> 33185767

Robotic versus open hemihepatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.

Kit-Fai Lee1, Charing Chong2, Sunny Cheung2, John Wong2, Andrew Fung2, Hon-Ting Lok2, Eugene Lo2, Paul Lai2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive approach has been increasingly applied in liver resection. However, laparoscopic major hepatectomy is technically demanding and is practiced only in expert centers around the world. Conversely, use of robot may help to overcome the difficulty and facilitate major hepatectomy.
METHODS: Between September 2010 and March 2019, 151 patients received robotic hepatectomy for various indications in our center. 36 patients received robotic hemihepatectomy: 26 left hepatectomy and 10 right hepatectomy. During the same period, 737 patients received open hepatectomy and out of these, 173 patients received open hemihepatectomy. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed in a 1:1 ratio.
RESULTS: After matching, there were 36 patients each in the robotic and open group. The two groups were comparable in demographic data, type of hemihepatectomy, underlying pathology, size of tumor, and background cirrhosis. Conversion was needed in 3 patients (8.3%) in the robotic group. There was no operative mortality. The operative blood loss and resection margin were similar. Though not significantly different, there was a higher rate of complications in the robotic group (36.1% vs. 22.2%) and this difference was mostly driven by higher intra-abdominal collection (16.7% vs. 5.6%) and bile leak (5.6% vs. 2.8%). Operative time was significantly longer (400.8 ± 136.1 min vs 255.4 ± 74.4 min, P < 0.001) but the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (median 5 days vs 6.5 days, P = 0.040) in the robotic group. When right and left hepatectomy were analyzed separately, the advantage of shorter hospital stay remained in left but not right hepatectomy. For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, there was no difference between the two groups in 5-year overall and disease-free survival.
CONCLUSION: Compared with the open approach, robotic hemihepatectomy has longer operation time but shorter hospital stay. Thus, use of robot is feasible and effective in hemihepatectomy with the benefit of shorter hospital stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemihepatectomy; Major hepatectomy; Open hepatectomy; Robotic hepatectomy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33185767     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07645-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  2 in total

1.  Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.

Authors:  Go Wakabayashi; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Joseph F Buell; Hironori Kaneko; Ho Seong Han; Horacio Asbun; Nicholas OʼRourke; Minoru Tanabe; Alan J Koffron; Allan Tsung; Olivier Soubrane; Marcel Autran Machado; Brice Gayet; Roberto I Troisi; Patrick Pessaux; Ronald M Van Dam; Olivier Scatton; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Giulio Belli; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Bjørn Edwin; Gi Hong Choi; Luca Antonio Aldrighetti; Xiujun Cai; Sean Cleary; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Michael R Schön; Atsushi Sugioka; Chung-Ngai Tang; Paulo Herman; Juan Pekolj; Xiao-Ping Chen; Ibrahim Dagher; William Jarnagin; Masakazu Yamamoto; Russell Strong; Palepu Jagannath; Chung-Mau Lo; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Norihiro Kokudo; Jeffrey Barkun; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions.

Authors:  H Reich; F McGlynn; J DeCaprio; R Budin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 7.661

  2 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Trocar layouts in laparoscopic liver surgery.

Authors:  Ziqi Hou; Qingyun Xie; Guoteng Qiu; Zhaoxing Jin; Sizheng Mi; Jiwei Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Short-Term Outcomes After Robotic Versus Open Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantina Papadopoulou; Panagiotis Dorovinis; Stylianos Kykalos; Dimitrios Schizas; Paraskevas Stamopoulos; Gerasimos Tsourouflis; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Nikolaos Nikiteas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2022-02-24

Review 3.  Robot-assisted liver resection: the real benefit so far.

Authors:  Reed I Ayabe; Ahad Azimuddin; Hop S Tran Cao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Robotic vs. laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-center analysis of 600 consecutive patients in 6 years.

Authors:  Moritz Schmelzle; Linda Feldbrügge; Santiago Andres Ortiz Galindo; Simon Moosburner; Anika Kästner; Felix Krenzien; Christian Benzing; Matthias Biebl; Robert Öllinger; Thomas Malinka; Wenzel Schöning; Johann Pratschke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Primary Hepatobiliary Tumors-Possibilities and Limitations.

Authors:  Julia Spiegelberg; Tanja Iken; Markus K Diener; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.