Literature DB >> 33184162

Draft Genome Sequences of Vibrio cholerae Non-O1, Non-O139 Isolates from Common Tern Chicks (Sterna hirundo) following a Mass Mortality Event.

Eckhard Strauch1, Claudia Jäckel2, Jens Andre Hammerl2, Veit Hennig3, Nicole Roschanski4, Insa Dammann4.   

Abstract

Vibrio cholerae is an inhabitant of aquatic environments worldwide. Here, we report the draft genome sequences of eight V. cholera non-O1, non-O139 isolates that were recovered from the corpses of two seabird chicks (common terns) following a mass mortality event in a German breeding colony in 2019.
Copyright © 2020 Strauch et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33184162      PMCID: PMC7661001          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01053-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

The presence of Vibrio cholerae in seabirds has been well known for many years (1, 2). Migrating birds are regarded as vectors for long-distance transport of these bacteria (3). Usually, the bacteria are regarded as commensals, while diseases of birds caused by V. cholerae are rarely reported. In July 2019, a high chick mortality rate was observed in a colony of common terns (Sterna hirundo) in the saltmarshes of Neufelderkoog (District Dithmarschen) in the River Elbe Estuary (53°53′37.0″N, 8°58′55.21″E) (4). There, the seabird brood of 1 year (∼1,500 chicks) died within 1 week shortly before they were able to fly. To determine the cause of death, necropsies and microbiological investigations were conducted on two chick corpses. Tissue samples were taken from inner organs, and the samples were cultivated at 37°C on Columbia sheep blood agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Berlin, Germany) and MacConkey agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 24 h and 48 h, respectively. Visible colonies were investigated using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MALDI Biotyper; Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). V. cholerae non-O1, non-O139 isolates were recovered from liver, kidney, heart, small intestine, and lung, raising the possibility that these bacteria could be involved in the death of the birds. Herring as the sole feed for the chicks were suspected as a source of the infection. One V. cholerae isolate from each organ (eight isolates in total) (Table 1) was cultured on thiosulfate-citrate-bile-sucrose agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and ChromID Vibrio agar (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) and sent to the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment.
TABLE 1

Phenotypic and genotypic features of the Vibrio cholerae isolates

ParameterData for isolate:
V917-19V918-19V919-19V920-19V921-19V922-19V923-19V924-19
Isolation originBird 1, lungBird 1, pericardiumBird 1, gutBird 1, kidneyBird 1, liverBird 2, kidneyBird 2, liverBird 2, gut
Country of isolationGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermany
Yr of isolation20192019201920192019201920192019
Phenotypic resistanceNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
MIC (mg/liter)a
 Ampicillin84444444
 Azithromycin≤2≤2≤2≤2≤2≤2≤2≤2
 Cefepime0.250.120.120.120.120.120.120.12
 Chloramphenicol≤8≤8≤8≤8≤8≤8≤8≤8
 Ciprofloxacin≤0.015≤0.015≤0.015≤0.015≤0.015≤0.015≤0.015≤0.015
 Colistin>16>16>16>16>16>16>16>16
 Ertapenem0.120.120.120.120.120.120.120.12
 Cefotaxime≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25
 Cefoxitin84448888
 Gentamicin21121221
 Imipenem22222222
 Meropenem0.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.25
 Nalidixic acid≤4≤4≤4≤4≤4≤4≤4≤4
 Sulfamethoxazole≤8≤8≤8≤8≤8≤8≤8≤8
 Cefotaxime-clavulanic acid≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06≤0.06
 Ceftazidime≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25
 Ceftazidime-clavulanic acid0.25≤0.12≤0.12≤0.12≤0.12≤0.12≤0.12≤0.12
 Temocillin42222222
 Tetracycline≤2≤2≤2≤2≤2≤2≤2≤2
 Tigecycline≤0.25≤0.25≤0.250.25≤0.25≤0.250.25≤0.25
 Trimethoprim≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25≤0.25
Sequencing parameters
 No. of reads (total)1,483,1801,727,8762,045,8081,406,7601,002,3641,206,7801,483,5521,206,780
 Average read length (bp)270274275275276273274273
 No. of contigs5556595660647161
N50 (bp)318,246688,697688,696318,246318,246318,246318,246324,219
L5043344444
 Genome coverage (×)2528302520202320
SRA accession no.SRR12520475SRR12520474SRR12520473SRR12520472SRR12520471SRR12520470SRR12520469SRR12520468
Genomic features
 Genome size (bp)4,089,4034,076,7564,089,6684,088,4494,089,0484,088,1054,089,0344,089,730
 GC content (%)47.4347.4447.4447.4347.4347.4347.4247.44
 Total no. of genes3,9853,9713,9873,9843,9903,9923,9883,990
 No. of coding genes3,7793,7643,7813,7803,7823,7863,7803,783
 No. of CDSsb (total)3,8723,8573,8743,8723,8773,8803,8743,876
 No. of CDSs (coding)3,7793,7643,7813,7803,7823,7863,7803,783
 Total no. of RNA genes113114113112113112114114
 Total no. of rRNA genes (5S, 16S, 23S)7, 7, 37, 7, 47, 7, 37, 7, 37, 7, 47, 6, 47, 7, 47, 7, 4
  No. of complete rRNA genes7, 1, 17, 1, 17, 1, 17, 1, 17, 1, 17, 0, 17, 1, 17, 1, 1
  No. of partial rRNA genes0, 6, 20, 6, 30, 6, 20, 6, 20, 6, 30, 6, 30, 6, 30, 6, 3
 No. of tRNA genes9292929191919292
 Total no. of pseudogenes9393939295949493
 No. of predicted prophagesc21222222
  47.7-kb K139 (GenBank accession no. NC_003313)++++++++
  7.1-kb KSF-1phi (GenBank accession no. AY714348.1)+++++++
 PlasmidsdNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Acquired antimicrobial resistanceeNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Sequence typefUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown
BioProject no.PRJNA563188PRJNA563189PRJNA563190PRJNA563191PRJNA563192PRJNA563193PRJNA563194PRJNA563195
BioSample no.SAMN12670120SAMN12670121SAMN12670122SAMN12670123SAMN12670124SAMN12670125SAMN12670126SAMN12670133
GenBank accession no.VTWK00000000.1VTWL00000000VTWM00000000.1VTWN00000000.1VTWO00000000.1VTWP00000000.1VTWQ00000000.1VTWR00000000.1

MICs were determined using broth microdilution according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (13).

CDSs, coding sequences.

Analysis was conducted using PHASTER (https://phaster.ca) with default parameters. +, present; −, absent.

Analysis was conducted using PlasmidFinder v2.1 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder) with a 95% threshold for minimum identity and 60% minimum coverage. ND, not detected.

Analysis was conducted using ResFinder v3.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder) with a 90% threshold for identity and 60% minimum length. The analysis of acquired determinants for the antimicrobial classes of aminoglycosides, β-lactams, colistin, fosfomycin, fusidic acid, macrolides, nitroimidazoles, oxazolidinones, phenicols, rifampin, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, trimethoprim, and glycopeptides yielded no matches.

Analysis was conducted using MLST v2.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MLST) using the Vibrio cholerae scheme. All strains had identical alleles, as follows: adk114, 100% identity; gyrB30, 100% identity; mdhE97, 100% identity; metE123, 100% identity; pntA66, 100% identity; purM9, 100% identity; pyrC (novel allele), 99.78% identity to pyrC147.

Phenotypic and genotypic features of the Vibrio cholerae isolates MICs were determined using broth microdilution according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (13). CDSs, coding sequences. Analysis was conducted using PHASTER (https://phaster.ca) with default parameters. +, present; −, absent. Analysis was conducted using PlasmidFinder v2.1 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder) with a 95% threshold for minimum identity and 60% minimum coverage. ND, not detected. Analysis was conducted using ResFinder v3.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder) with a 90% threshold for identity and 60% minimum length. The analysis of acquired determinants for the antimicrobial classes of aminoglycosides, β-lactams, colistin, fosfomycin, fusidic acid, macrolides, nitroimidazoles, oxazolidinones, phenicols, rifampin, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, trimethoprim, and glycopeptides yielded no matches. Analysis was conducted using MLST v2.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MLST) using the Vibrio cholerae scheme. All strains had identical alleles, as follows: adk114, 100% identity; gyrB30, 100% identity; mdhE97, 100% identity; metE123, 100% identity; pntA66, 100% identity; purM9, 100% identity; pyrC (novel allele), 99.78% identity to pyrC147. For whole-genome sequencing, isolates were grown in lysogeny broth and genomic DNA was extracted with the PureLink genomic DNA kit (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). MiSeq whole-genome sequencing (5) was conducted using the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit for library preparation and the MiSeq reagent 600-cycle v3 kit for paired-end sequence determination, as specified by the manufacturer (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Raw reads were processed to quality-trimmed sequences using fastp v0.19.5 (https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp) with the following specifications: base limit, 50; length required, 15. Sequences were further checked with FastQC v1.0.4 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). Automated de novo assembly (SPAdes v3.5.49) and genome annotation were performed using PATRIC (release 3.5.39) (6). Default parameters were routinely used for all software tools. Further information on software versions and parameters is given in Table 1. Bioinformatic analysis was conducted with the specified tools of the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (http://www.genomicepidemiology.org) and PGAP (National Center for Biotechnology Information) (7). Prophage prediction was performed with PHASTER (accessed 9 June 2019) (8). Important phenotypic and genotypic features of the V. cholerae genomes are summarized in Table 1. Determination of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes was performed as described previously (9). Because the genomes exhibited <19 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 4,072,405 positions (representing nearly 100% of the genomes), the isolates were suggested to be clonal. In silico prediction of phage-associated sequences revealed the presence of up to two prophages. One prophage sequence is similar to that of the linear Vibrio satellite phage KSF-1phi (GenBank accession number AY714348) (10). The second prophage possesses sequences matching those of the phage myovirus K139 (GenBank accession number NC_003313) (11). The genomes of the seabird isolates possess an SXT/R391-like integrative conjugative element (ICE) that is related to a 103-kb ICEVchBan8 element (GenBank accession number JQ345361) of a human pathogenic V. cholerae O37 strain (12). This ICE encodes potential virulence factors in a hot spot region of 45 kb, which might have contributed to the premature deaths of the young birds.

Data availability.

Accession numbers for whole-genome sequences and raw sequencing reads (SRA accession numbers) are listed in Table 1.
  11 in total

1.  Characterization of the major control region of Vibrio cholerae bacteriophage K139: immunity, exclusion, and integration.

Authors:  J Nesper; J Blass; M Fountoulakis; J Reidl
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The incidence of Vibrio cholerae in water, animals and birds in Kent, England.

Authors:  J V Lee; D J Bashford; T J Donovan; A L Furniss; P A West
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1982-04

3.  Genomic sequence and receptor for the Vibrio cholerae phage KSF-1phi: evolutionary divergence among filamentous vibriophages mediating lateral gene transfer.

Authors:  Shah M Faruque; Iftekhar Bin Naser; Kazutaka Fujihara; Pornphan Diraphat; Nityananda Chowdhury; M Kamruzzaman; Firdausi Qadri; Shinji Yamasaki; A N Ghosh; John J Mekalanos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Genomic analysis of ICEVchBan8: An atypical genetic element in Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Elisa Taviani; Matteo Spagnoletti; Daniela Ceccarelli; Bradd J Haley; Nur A Hasan; Arlene Chen; Mauro M Colombo; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center.

Authors:  Alice R Wattam; James J Davis; Rida Assaf; Sébastien Boisvert; Thomas Brettin; Christopher Bun; Neal Conrad; Emily M Dietrich; Terry Disz; Joseph L Gabbard; Svetlana Gerdes; Christopher S Henry; Ronald W Kenyon; Dustin Machi; Chunhong Mao; Eric K Nordberg; Gary J Olsen; Daniel E Murphy-Olson; Robert Olson; Ross Overbeek; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Maulik Shukla; Veronika Vonstein; Andrew Warren; Fangfang Xia; Hyunseung Yoo; Rick L Stevens
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Carbapenemase VCC-1-Producing Vibrio cholerae in Coastal Waters of Germany.

Authors:  Jens A Hammerl; Claudia Jäckel; Valeria Bortolaia; Keike Schwartz; Nadja Bier; Rene S Hendriksen; Beatriz Guerra; Eckhard Strauch
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Veterinary Vibrio cincinnatiensis Isolates.

Authors:  Claudia Jäckel; Jens Andre Hammerl; Huynh-Huong-Thao Arslan; Cornelia Göllner; Nicole Vom Ort; Karin Taureck; Eckhard Strauch
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 8.  Accumulating evidence suggests that some waterbird species are potential vectors of Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Sivan Laviad-Shitrit; Ido Izhaki; Malka Halpern
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool.

Authors:  David Arndt; Jason R Grant; Ana Marcu; Tanvir Sajed; Allison Pon; Yongjie Liang; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.