Literature DB >> 30167382

A 3D printed mechanical bioreactor for investigating mechanobiology and soft tissue mechanics.

Abigail R Raveling1, Sophia K Theodossiou1, Nathan R Schiele1.   

Abstract

Mechanical loading is an important cue for directing stem cell fate and engineered tissue formation in vitro. Stem cells cultured on 2-dimensional (D) substrates and in 3D scaffolds have been shown to differentiate toward bone, tendon, cartilage, ligament, and skeletal muscle lineages depending on their exposure to mechanical stimuli. To apply this mechanical stimulus in vitro, mechanical bioreactors are needed. However, current bioreactor systems are challenged by their high cost, limited ability for customization, and lack of force measurement capabilities. We demonstrate the use of 3-dimensional printing (3DP) technology to design and fabricate a low-cost custom bioreactor system that can be used to apply controlled mechanical stimuli to cells in culture and measure the mechanical properties of small soft tissues. The results of our in vitro studies and mechanical evaluations show that 3DP technology is feasible as a platform for developing a low-cost, customizable, and multifunctional mechanical bioreactor system. • 3DP technology was used to print a multifunctional bioreactor system/tensile load frame for a fraction of the cost of commercial systems. • The system mechanically stimulated cells in culture and evaluated the mechanical properties of soft tissues. • This system is easily customizable and can be used to evaluate multiple types of soft tissues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; 3DP, 3-dimensional printing; ABS, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene; CAD, computer-aided design; D, dimensional; DAPI, 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DAQ, data acquisition device; DMEM, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium; Design and fabrication of a 3D printed mechanical bioreactor system and small-scale tensile load frame; FBS, fetal bovine serum; MSC-constructs, MSC-seeded collagen sponges; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; MTTFs, mouse tail tendon fascicles; Mechanical bioreactor; Mechanobiology; NI, National Instruments; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; Soft tissue biomechanics; Stem cells; Tissue engineering

Year:  2018        PMID: 30167382      PMCID: PMC6111048          DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2018.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MethodsX        ISSN: 2215-0161


Method details

Introduction

Mechanobiology and tissue engineering approaches require a mechanical bioreactor system that can apply user-defined cyclic strains to cells and tissues in vitro and mechanically evaluate the developing tissues. The objective of this study was to design, build, and evaluate a low-cost, customizable, and multifunctional mechanical bioreactor system. To achieve this, we focused on developing a tensile bioreactor with potential applications for soft tissues such as tendons, ligaments, or skin. Here, we utilized 3-dimensional printing (3DP) to build a low-cost culture chamber for maintaining cells and engineered tissues in culture medium and custom grips for mounting 3D engineered tissue constructs and soft tissues. Additionally, we developed custom software to control three actuators and monitor load cells independently to conduct high-throughput loading experiments and evaluate the mechanical properties of developing tissues. Our results show that 3DP is a promising technology that can be used to fabricate a multifunctional, low-cost, mechanical bioreactor system.

Mechanical bioreactor design

The bioreactor system design described in this study was modeled after a system developed by Kluge et al. [1] and used by colleagues [1,2], but has several significant modifications. Here, the system was designed to be vertically orientated to reduce the potential for off-axis forces. This vertical orientation also eliminated the need for rubber gaskets associated with the moving actuator connectors, which reduced the potential for friction in the system and errors in force measurements. In addition, the bottom grip (i.e., the static grip) was fully integrated into the culture chamber to reduce the number of moving parts. The culture chambers, soft tissue grips, and actuator arm were designed in a computer-aided design (CAD) software package (SolidWorks Corp., Waltham, MA) (Fig. 1, and see supplemental data for the SolidWorks drawing files and STL files). The rectangular culture chambers were 71 × 128 × 29 mm with inner chamber dimensions of 51 × 98 × 26 mm. The grips have a custom waveform pattern that secures a wide range of soft tissues and minimizes slipping during tensile loading. Two custom soft tissue grips were developed, one for mechanical evaluations and the other for use with soft 3D cell-seeded scaffolds in vitro. For mechanical testing, through-holes in the fixed grip and actuator arm grip allowed for tissues to be mounted and secured with stainless steel cap screws and nuts (Fig. 1A–C). For in vitro culture, the grips were designed to have snap-hooks at either end in place of through-holes. Corresponding snap-hook grooves were developed for the actuator arm and static culture chamber grip. This modification eliminated the need for through-holes spanning the depth of the chamber, which reduced the potential for culture medium leakage and allowed for more rapid and sterile mounting of cell-seeded scaffolds (Fig. 1D–G). The culture chambers were equipped with mounting posts to quickly load and secure chambers into the bottom plate of an aluminum load frame using two-piece shaft collars. A through-hole for the moving actuator arm allowed the arm to move with minimal friction. A separate port in the chambers was designed for adding and exchanging cell culture medium. A syringe filter covered the cell culture medium port during in vitro culture, maintaining a sterile environment while allowing for gas exchange within the culture chamber. The front of the chamber was designed to be sealed with a transparent polycarbonate cover that compresses against a rubber o-ring using stainless steel wing-nuts and bolts for quick, tool-free mounting. A list of materials is found in Table 1.
Fig. 1

Engineering drawings of the custom mechanical bioreactor chambers, grips, and scaffold seeding wells. (A) Chamber, (B) grips, and (C) actuator arm designed for mechanical evaluation of soft tissues. Through-holes in the grips allow for secure mounting of tissues using stainless steel cap screws and nuts to prevent slipping during a pull-to-failure. (D) Cell culture chamber, (E) snap hook grip, and (G) actuator arm for sterile cell culture. Through-holes are eliminated, and the snap hook system successfully secures the cell-seeded scaffolds. (F) Custom wells for seeding scaffolds with cells.

Table 1

List of materials for the bioreactor system.

NameVendorCatalog NumberDescription
Inventor Dual Extrusion 3D PrinterFlashforge USA69701529501923D printer
ABS filamentFlashforge USAn/aABS filament for 3D printer
AcetoneMacron Chemicalsn/aAcetone for waterproofing 3D printed parts
Linear ActuatorHaydon Kerk35H4N-2.33-915Size 14, captive, stepper motor linear actuator
Stepper Motor ControllerPeter Norberg Consulting, IncAR-BC4E20EUUSB, four stepper motor controller
DAQ ChassisNational Instruments781425-01DAQ-9171, CompactDAQ Chassis
DAQ Universal ModuleNational Instruments779781-01NI 9219 Universal AI Module
Load CellsHoneywell Sensing & Controln/aModel 31 Load cell
PolycarbonateMcMaster-Carr8574K26Clear polycarbonate sheet
Wing nutsMcMaster-Carr94545A22018-8 Stainless Steel Wing Nut, M4 × 0.7 mm
Hex Head ScrewMcMaster-Carr91287A05318-8 Stainless Steel Hex Head Screw, M4 × 0.7 mm Thread, 40 mm Long
O-ringsMcMaster-Carr9262K716Buna-N O-Ring, 2 mm Wide, 100 mm
Shaft CouplingMcMaster-Carr61005K411Clamp-on Rigid Shaft Coupling Type 303 Stainless Steel
Thread AdaptorMcMaster-Carr98434A12618-8 Stainless Steel Female Hex Thread Adapter 6-32 to M4 × 0.7 mm
Female threaded round standoffMcMaster-Carr91125A44218-8 Stainless Steel, 1/4" OD, 5/16" Long, 6-32 Thread Size
Shaft CollarMcMaster-Carr9520T8Clamping Two-Piece Shaft Collar for 14 mm Diameter, 2024 Aluminum
Quick-Disconnect wire terminalsMcMaster-Carr72625K74/ 72625K75Fully Insulated Heat-Shrink Quick-Disconnect Terminals Male/Female, for 22-18 Wire Gauge
Hex Head Cap ScrewMcMaster-Carr93635A025316 Stainless Steel, M3 × 0.5 mm Thread, 30 mm Long
Thin Hex nutMcMaster-Carr93935A320316 Stainless Steel, M3 × 0.5 mm Thread
Socket Head Cap ScrewMcMaster-Carr91292A11418-8 Stainless Steel, M3 × 0.5 mm Thread, 12 mm Long
Engineering drawings of the custom mechanical bioreactor chambers, grips, and scaffold seeding wells. (A) Chamber, (B) grips, and (C) actuator arm designed for mechanical evaluation of soft tissues. Through-holes in the grips allow for secure mounting of tissues using stainless steel cap screws and nuts to prevent slipping during a pull-to-failure. (D) Cell culture chamber, (E) snap hook grip, and (G) actuator arm for sterile cell culture. Through-holes are eliminated, and the snap hook system successfully secures the cell-seeded scaffolds. (F) Custom wells for seeding scaffolds with cells. List of materials for the bioreactor system.

Fabrication

The 3D drawings (SolidWorks) were sliced into 2D layers using Flashforge Flashprint (Flashforge USA, City of Industry, CA) software with a slice resolution of 2.5 μm. The chambers, grips, and actuator arms were printed with 1.75-mm diameter acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic filament (Flashforge) using a FlashForge Inventor 3D printer. ABS is an appealing material for use with cell culture as it is chemically and biologically inert [3], and can be sterilized using ethanol [4]. The extruder nozzle was heated to 230 °C and the platform was heated to 110 °C. Each print had 5 shells and a print speed ranging from 50 to 70 mm/s. The culture chambers were printed with a 0.12 mm layer height and 15% infill, while the grips and actuator arms had a 0.12 mm layer height and 30% infill. The ABS plastic culture chambers were waterproofed by treating them with an acetone vapor bath. The bottom of a glass 3 L beaker was covered with acetone (Macron Chemicals, Center Valley, PA) to a height of 3 to 4 mm and heated until boiling. The culture chambers were then lowered into the beaker and covered with Parafilm M (Bermis NA, Neenah, WI) to seal in the acetone vapor. After 5 min, the chambers were removed from the beaker and air-dried for 12 h. The acetone vapor-treated chambers had a smooth and waterproof finish.

Data acquisition and control

Three size 14 stepper motor linear actuators (Haydon Kerk, Waterbury, CT) were mounted to the top-plate of an aluminum frame (Fig. 2). Stainless steel mounting hardware was used to connect the load cells and actuator arms to each of the linear actuators. Heat-shrink quick-disconnect wire terminals were used to connect the actuator wiring and allow the entire bioreactor system to be easily inserted into a standard cell culture incubator through the sampling port. A 1000 g (9.81 N) capacity load cell (Model 31, Honeywell Sensing and Controls, Columbus, OH) was attached to each linear actuator. The load cells collect force data through a National Instruments (NI) data acquisition device (DAQ) (NI, Austin, TX). Calibration of the load cells was conducted using 18 different calibrated masses. Three consecutive load cell readings were taken for each calibrated mass and a calibration curve was generated. Two additional load cells with 150 g and 500 g capacities (Honeywell) were calibrated using the same procedure, but were not used in the validation experiments described below. However, the load cells can be easily interchanged in the system as needed for different tissues and force capacities. A stepper motor controller board (Peter Norberg, Ferguson, MO) and custom LabView™ programs control the movement of the actuators. To calibrate the actuators, digital images of the actuator grips were taken following actuator movements to 15 different displacement locations. ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD) was used to measure the grip-to-grip displacement from 3 images taken at each location, moving the motor back to a predetermined zero position between captures. Using these calibrated load cells, actuators, and custom LabView™ controls [1], precise cyclic tensile strains can be applied and force and displacement data can be collected. The cyclic program (LabView™) provides user control over strain magnitude, strain rate, number of repetitions (cycles), frequency, and dwell time between stretches. A separate ramp control program can perform pull-to-failure tests to measure tensile mechanical properties of soft tissues and provides user control over strain magnitude, strain rate, and data collection rate.
Fig. 2

3D printed cell culture chambers mounted into the bioreactor system. Stainless steel couplers attach the actuator arms to the linear actuators and load cells. Clear polycarbonate covers seal the chambers. Custom soft tissue grips secure the scaffolds and prevent slipping during loading. The entire system fits inside a standard cell culture incubator.

3D printed cell culture chambers mounted into the bioreactor system. Stainless steel couplers attach the actuator arms to the linear actuators and load cells. Clear polycarbonate covers seal the chambers. Custom soft tissue grips secure the scaffolds and prevent slipping during loading. The entire system fits inside a standard cell culture incubator.

Methods validation and results

In vitro bioreactor validation - dynamic mechanical stimulation of stem cells in 3D scaffolds

To evaluate the bioreactor for in vitro cell culture, 3D collagen type I sponges (DSM Biomaterials, Exton, PA) were prepared using a protocol previously described [5]. The collagen sponges were cut into dumbbell-shaped tensile specimens (12 mm gauge length and 4 mm width), sterilized overnight on a rocker in 70% ethanol, washed in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) 6 times for 30 min each, and placed into custom 3D printed culture wells for cell seeding (Fig. 1F). Murine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (C3H10T1/2, ATCC, Manassas, VA), a model MSC used in prior tendon tissue engineering studies of cyclically loaded cells [6,7], were cultured in standard growth medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin) until 70% confluent, and used between passage 3 and 9. MSCs were trypsinized, and then 1 × 106 cells were seeded into each collagen sponge, and incubated for 24 h in the 3D printed culture wells for initial cell attachment. The MSC-seeded collagen sponges (MSC-constructs) were mounted into the bioreactor culture chambers (Fig. 1D, E, G). The chambers were initially sterilized by soaking them overnight in a bath of 70% ethanol. The culture chambers were filled with 40 mL of fresh cell culture medium to ensure the MSC-constructs were fully submerged, even when stretched. MSC-constructs were preloaded to 0.02 N to remove the slack, and the grip-to-grip length of each MSC-construct was measured using digital calipers. Independent displacement control of each actuator ensured that each MSC-construct was cyclically loaded to a peak tensile strain of 10% at a strain rate of 1%/s for 720 cycles/day (0.05 Hz) for three days (n = 3), despite the slight differences in construct lengths after the initial preload was applied. MSC-constructs mounted in the culture chambers and statically loaded (e.g., 0 cycles) were used as controls (n = 3). On day 4, the MSC-constructs were fixed in 10% formalin, stained with FITC-phalloidin (Life Technologies) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to observe the actin cytoskeleton and cell nuclei, respectively, and then imaged on a spinning-disk confocal microscope (Nikon/Andor, Melville, NY). The staining showed that MSCs were present in both the cyclically loaded and static control groups. Furthermore, cyclic tensile strain appeared to increase actin cytoskeleton network formation, intercellular connections, and proliferation by the MSCs when compared to the static controls (Fig. 3), which is consistent with other studies [1,[8], [9], [10]]. These results demonstrate this bioreactor is useful for applying mechanical stimuli to cells in culture.
Fig. 3

Representative images (20x magnification) of cell nuclei (A, D) and actin cytoskeleton (B, E) of MSCs seeded into collagen sponges and loaded in tension statically (A, B, C) or cyclically (D, E, F) in the bioreactor for 3 days. The merged images of (C, F) of the cell nuclei (blue) and actin cytoskeleton (green) show that cyclic loading in the bioreactor appeared to increase cell proliferation and actin network formation.

Representative images (20x magnification) of cell nuclei (A, D) and actin cytoskeleton (B, E) of MSCs seeded into collagen sponges and loaded in tension statically (A, B, C) or cyclically (D, E, F) in the bioreactor for 3 days. The merged images of (C, F) of the cell nuclei (blue) and actin cytoskeleton (green) show that cyclic loading in the bioreactor appeared to increase cell proliferation and actin network formation.

Mechanical validation – tensile load frame

To evaluate the mechanical bioreactor as a small-scale tensile load frame, the mechanical properties of mouse tail tendon fascicles (MTTFs) and collagen sponges (DSM Biomaterials) were measured. MTTFs were isolated from the tails of 2.5-month old wild-type mice (n = 5) with mixed C57BL/6, C3H, 129, and FVB genetic backgrounds that had been used for another University of Idaho IACUC approved study. The MTTFs were removed from the tails in PBS, secured in the mechanical testing grips (Fig. 1A–C) with sandpaper to limit slipping, mounted in the bioreactor, and submerged in PBS. Cross-sectional areas and initial lengths were measured from calibrated digital images using ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD). The MTTFs were preloaded to 0.02 N to remove the slack, and preconditioned for 10 cycles to 5% strain at a strain rate of 1%/s. After preconditioning, the MTTFs were pulled in tension to failure at a strain rate of 1%/s while recording the force and displacement. Results are reported as average ± standard deviation. The custom grips secured the MTTFs (diameter of 216 ± 67 μm) without slipping. The fascicles had a maximum (max) force of 0.59 ± 0.34 N and corresponding displacement of 1.3 ± 0.3 mm, linear-region stiffness of 0.7 ± 0.4 N/mm, max stress of 15.7 ± 4 MPa and corresponding strain of 9.2 ± 2.4%, and linear-region elastic modulus of 266 ± 72 MPa (Table 2). The structural and material properties of MTTFs measured in this study are within the expected range [11,12]. Collagen sponges were also mechanically evaluated using the same mechanical testing protocol. However, the collagen sponges (n = 3) were first cut into dumbbell-shaped specimens with a consistent gauge length of 12 mm and width of 4 mm, as described above for cell culture. The collagen sponges had a max force of 0.24 ± 0.03 N and corresponding displacement of 4.1 ± 0.4 mm, linear-region stiffness of 0.09 ± 0.007 N/mm, max stress of 19 ± 2 kPa and strain of 20.6 ± 2.1%, and linear-region elastic modulus of 143 ± 7 kPa (Table 2). As expected, the collagen sponges are dramatically softer and weaker than the MTTFs, and are consistent with a prior study that reported a tensile elastic modulus of bovine collagen sponges of approximately 50 kPa, and an ultimate stress of 12 kPa [13]. Typical force-displacement curves for the fascicles and collagen sponges are shown in Fig. 4. Overall, we show that our bioreactor is useful as a small-scale tensile load frame.
Table 2

Mechanical properties of MTTFs and collagen sponges evaluated using the bioreactor system (mean ± standard deviation).

MaterialMax force (N)Displacement at max force (mm)Stiffness (N/mm)Max stress (MPa)Strain at max stress (%)Elastic modulus (MPa)
Tendon fascicle0.59 ± 0.341.3 ± 0.30.7 ± 0.415.7 ± 49.2 ± 2.4266 ± 72
Collagen sponge0.24 ± 0.034.1 ± 0.40.09 ± 0.0070.019 ± 0.00220.6 ± 2.10.143 ± 0.007
Fig. 4

Representative force-displacement curves for a tendon fascicle and collagen scaffold.

Mechanical properties of MTTFs and collagen sponges evaluated using the bioreactor system (mean ± standard deviation). Representative force-displacement curves for a tendon fascicle and collagen scaffold.

Discussion and conclusion

3DP is rapid, easily customizable, and lower cost in comparison to machined parts. Each chamber assembly (including the actuator arm and grips) costs approximately $4.90 to print. The 3D printed components are reusable and can be sterilized with 70% ethanol between uses, further reducing the cost. As the bioreactor system is currently configured, it can evaluate the tensile mechanical properties of small-scale soft tissues that have maximum failure loads of less than 10 N (currently limited by the maximum force capacity of the load cell). While this limitation could be addressed through use of higher capacity load cells, the linear actuators and ABS plastic actuator arms and grips further limit the maximum force capacity. The size 14 linear actuators used here have a maximum force capacity of 222 N. Given that ABS has a reported Young’s Modulus in tension of about 1600 MPa and tensile yield stress of 39 MPa [14], it is unlikely that the ABS actuator arm noticeably deforms under the small loads applied during in vitro culture or mechanical evaluations. Based on the cross-sectional area of the actuator arm (6-mm diameter) and 30% in-fill used during 3DP, we estimate the strain in the actuator arm at the maximum load cell capacity (10 N) to be approximately 0.0066% and 300 N would be required to reach the yield point. However, for mechanically evaluating larger tissues, a traditional materials testing load frame (e.g., an Instron) would be more appropriate. In conclusion, we demonstrated a method for the design and fabrication of a functional, low-cost, and highly customizable 3D printed mechanical bioreactor that is useful for applications in mechanobiology and tissue engineering. Our system was able to evaluate the mechanical properties of small soft tissues (tail tendon fascicles) and engineered tissue scaffolds. Additionally, our bioreactor was successfully used to mechanically stimulate stem cells in culture for 3 days, demonstrating its value for in vitro cell culture. Future studies using this bioreactor system will focus on longer-term cell culture and evaluating the influence of mechanical stimuli on engineered tissue formation.

Author disclosure statement

No competing financial interests exist.
  13 in total

1.  The use of mesenchymal stem cells in collagen-based scaffolds for tissue-engineered repair of tendons.

Authors:  David L Butler; Cynthia Gooch; Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Gregory P Boivin; Marc T Galloway; V Sanjit Nirmalanandhan; Jason T Shearn; Nathaniel A Dyment; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  A quantitative investigation of structure-function relationships in a tendon fascicle model.

Authors:  K A Derwin; L J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Cyclic strain anisotropy regulates valvular interstitial cell phenotype and tissue remodeling in three-dimensional culture.

Authors:  Russell A Gould; Karen Chin; Thom P Santisakultarm; Amanda Dropkin; Jennifer M Richards; Chris B Schaffer; Jonathan T Butcher
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  A bioreactor system for in vitro tendon differentiation and tendon tissue engineering.

Authors:  Daniel W Youngstrom; Ibtesam Rajpar; David L Kaplan; Jennifer G Barrett
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  The mechanical properties of tail tendon fascicles from lubricin knockout, wild type and heterozygous mice.

Authors:  John Reuvers; Andrew R Thoreson; Chunfeng Zhao; Ling Zhang; Gregory D Jay; Kai-Nan An; Matthew L Warman; Peter C Amadio
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.867

6.  Mechanical force modulates scleraxis expression in bioartificial tendons.

Authors:  A Scott; P Danielson; T Abraham; G Fong; A V Sampaio; T M Underhill
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.041

7.  Bioreactor system using noninvasive imaging and mechanical stretch for biomaterial screening.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kluge; Gary G Leisk; Robyn D Cardwell; Alexander P Fernandes; Michael House; Andrew Ward; A Luis Dorfmann; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Remodeling of actin cytoskeleton in mouse periosteal cells under mechanical loading induces periosteal cell proliferation during bone formation.

Authors:  Daisuke Sakai; Isao Kii; Kazuki Nakagawa; Hiroko N Matsumoto; Masateru Takahashi; Suguru Yoshida; Takamitsu Hosoya; Kazuo Takakuda; Akira Kudo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  On the intrinsic sterility of 3D printing.

Authors:  Russell Y Neches; Kaitlin J Flynn; Luis Zaman; Emily Tung; Nicholas Pudlo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  The Role of Scleraxis in Fate Determination of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Tenocyte Differentiation.

Authors:  Yonghui Li; Melissa Ramcharan; Zuping Zhou; Daniel J Leong; Takintope Akinbiyi; Robert J Majeska; Hui B Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Onset of neonatal locomotor behavior and the mechanical development of Achilles and tail tendons.

Authors:  Sophia K Theodossiou; Aimee L Bozeman; Nicholas Burgett; Michele R Brumley; Hillary E Swann; Abigail R Raveling; Jordan J Becker; Nathan R Schiele
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Application of 3D Printing Technology for Design and Manufacturing of Customized Components for a Mechanical Stretching Bioreactor.

Authors:  Giovanni Putame; Mara Terzini; Dario Carbonaro; Giuseppe Pisani; Gianpaolo Serino; Franca Di Meglio; Clotilde Castaldo; Diana Massai
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 2.682

3.  Ex-vivo quantification of ovine pia arachnoid complex biomechanical properties under uniaxial tension.

Authors:  Gabryel Conley Natividad; Sophia K Theodossiou; Nathan R Schiele; Gordon K Murdoch; Alkiviadis Tsamis; Bertrand Tanner; Gabriel Potirniche; Martin Mortazavi; David A Vorp; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-11-12

4.  A universal multi-platform 3D printed bioreactor chamber for tendon tissue engineering.

Authors:  Adam J Janvier; Elizabeth Canty-Laird; James R Henstock
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 5.  Integration of clinical perspective into biomimetic bioreactor design for orthopedics.

Authors:  Victoria Drapal; Jordan M Gamble; Jennifer L Robinson; Candan Tamerler; Paul M Arnold; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Small-Scale Fluidized Bed Bioreactor for Long-Term Dynamic Culture of 3D Cell Constructs and in vitro Testing.

Authors:  Joana Mendonça da Silva; Eloy Erro; Maooz Awan; Sherri-Ann Chalmers; Barry Fuller; Clare Selden
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-08-20

7.  Models of tendon development and injury.

Authors:  Sophia K Theodossiou; Nathan R Schiele
Journal:  BMC Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 8.  Miniaturization and 3D Printing of Bioreactors: A Technological Mini Review.

Authors:  Spyridon Achinas; Jorn-Ids Heins; Janneke Krooneman; Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.891

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.