Literature DB >> 33183069

Pulmonary gene delivery-Realities and possibilities.

Uday K Baliga1,2, David A Dean1.   

Abstract

Delivery of genetic material to tissues in vivo is an important technique used in research settings and is the foundation upon which clinical gene therapy is built. The lung is a prime target for gene delivery due to a host of genetic, acquired, and infectious diseases that manifest themselves there, resulting in many pathologies. However, the in vivo delivery of genetic material to the lung remains a practical problem clinically and is considered the major obstacle needed to be overcome for gene therapy. Currently there are four main strategies for in vivo gene delivery to the lung: viral vectors, liposomes, nanoparticles, and electroporation. Viral delivery uses several different genetically modified viruses that enter the cell and express desired genes that have been inserted to the viral genome. Liposomes use combinations of charged and neutral lipids that can encapsulate genetic cargo and enter cells through endogenous mechanisms, thereby delivering their cargoes. Nanoparticles are defined by their size (typically less than 100 nm) and are made up of many different classes of building blocks, including biological and synthetic polymers, cell penetrant and other peptides, and dendrimers, that also enter cells through endogenous mechanisms. Electroporation uses mild to moderate electrical pulses to create pores in the cell membrane through which delivered genetic material can enter a cell. An emerging fifth category, exosomes and extracellular vesicles, may have advantages of both viral and non-viral approaches. These extracellular vesicles bud from cellular membranes containing receptors and ligands that may aid cell targeting and which can be loaded with genetic material for efficient transfer. Each of these vectors can be used for different gene delivery applications based on mechanisms of action, side-effects, and other factors, and their use in the lung and possible clinical considerations is the primary focus of this review.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung; electroporation; exosomes; gene delivery; liposomes; nanoparticles; viral vectors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33183069      PMCID: PMC7876645          DOI: 10.1177/1535370220965985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)        ISSN: 1535-3699


  144 in total

Review 1.  Electroporation of the vasculature and the lung.

Authors:  David A Dean
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.311

Review 2.  Progress towards liver and lung-directed gene therapy with helper-dependent adenoviral vectors.

Authors:  Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Philip Ng
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.391

3.  Gene therapy's next installment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Nanoparticle-Based Medicines: A Review of FDA-Approved Materials and Clinical Trials to Date.

Authors:  Daniel Bobo; Kye J Robinson; Jiaul Islam; Kristofer J Thurecht; Simon R Corrie
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Electrochemotherapy - Emerging applications technical advances, new indications, combined approaches, and multi-institutional collaboration.

Authors:  Luca G Campana; Ibrahim Edhemovic; Declan Soden; Anna M Perrone; Marco Scarpa; Laura Campanacci; Maja Cemazar; Sara Valpione; Damijan Miklavčič; Simone Mocellin; Elisabetta Sieni; Gregor Sersa
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Irreversible electroporation (IRE) fails to demonstrate efficacy in a prospective multicenter phase II trial on lung malignancies: the ALICE trial.

Authors:  Jens Ricke; Julian H W Jürgens; Frederic Deschamps; Lambros Tselikas; Katja Uhde; Ortrud Kosiek; Thierry De Baere
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Irreversible electroporation for nonthermal tumor ablation in the clinical setting: a systematic review of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Hester J Scheffer; Karin Nielsen; Marcus C de Jong; Aukje A J M van Tilborg; Jenny M Vieveen; Arthur R A Bouwman; Sybren Meijer; Cornelis van Kuijk; Petrousjka M P van den Tol; Martijn R Meijerink
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Enrichment of the lung microbiome with gut bacteria in sepsis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Robert P Dickson; Benjamin H Singer; Michael W Newstead; Nicole R Falkowski; John R Erb-Downward; Theodore J Standiford; Gary B Huffnagle
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 17.745

Review 9.  Lessons learned from lung and liver in-vivo gene therapy: implications for the future.

Authors:  Joost van Haasteren; Stephen C Hyde; Deborah R Gill
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.388

10.  Microvesicles derived from human Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells enhance autophagy and ameliorate acute lung injury via delivery of miR-100.

Authors:  Wen-Xia Chen; Jun Zhou; Sha-Sha Zhou; Yu-Dan Zhang; Tong-Yu Ji; Xiao-Li Zhang; Shu-Min Wang; Tao Du; De-Gang Ding
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 6.832

View more
  2 in total

1.  Orthogonal Design of Experiments for Optimization of Lipid Nanoparticles for mRNA Engineering of CAR T Cells.

Authors:  Margaret M Billingsley; Alex G Hamilton; David Mai; Savan K Patel; Kelsey L Swingle; Neil C Sheppard; Carl H June; Michael J Mitchell
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 12.262

Review 2.  Genetic Delivery and Gene Therapy in Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Nabham Rai; Mazen Shihan; Werner Seeger; Ralph T Schermuly; Tatyana Novoyatleva
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.