| Literature DB >> 33182719 |
Tan Yi1, Hanyu Zhao1, Qi Mo1, Donglei Pan1, Yang Liu1,2, Lijie Huang1,2, Hao Xu1, Bao Hu1, Hainong Song3.
Abstract
This review summarizes the preparation methods of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) and the progress in the research pertaining to their surface modification. Moreover, the preparation and surface modification of nanocellulose were comprehensively introduced based on the existing literature. The review focuses on the mechanical treatment of cellulose, the surface modification of fibrillated fibers during pretreatment, the surface modification of nanocellulose and the modification of CNFs and their functional application. In the past five years, research on cellulose nanofibrils has progressed with developments in nanomaterials research technology. The number of papers on nanocellulose alone has increased by six times. However, owing to its high energy consumption, high cost and challenging industrial production, the applications of nanocellulose remain limited. In addition, although nanofibrils exhibit strong biocompatibility and barrier and mechanical properties, their high hydrophilicity limits their practical application. Current research on cellulose nanofibrils has mainly focused on the industrial production of CNFs, their pretreatment and functional modification and their compatibility with other biomass materials. In the future, with the rapid development of modern science and technology, the demand for biodegradable biomass materials will continue to increase. Furthermore, research on bio-based nanomaterials is expected to advance in the direction of functionalization and popularization.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose nanofibrils; chemical modification; preparation process; surface modification
Year: 2020 PMID: 33182719 PMCID: PMC7697919 DOI: 10.3390/ma13225062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Cellulose molecular structure.
Cellulose content and fiber length of common raw materials.
| Raw Material | Fiber Content (%) | Fiber Length (mm) | Fiber Diameter (µm) | Lignin Content (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wood-Conifer | 40–53 | 2–5 | 30–70 | 25–35 | Wang et al. [ |
| Wood-Hardwood | 41–44 | ≈1 | 14–20 | 20–25 | |
| Bast Fiber | 65–80 | – | 10–25 | 4–20 | |
| Herb | 35–55 | 1–2 | 10–30 | 15–25 | |
| Cotton Fiber | 95–97 | 25–65 | 12–38 | – | |
| Lint | 90–91 | 10–20 | <3 | ||
| Brewing Waste | 16–25 | – | – | 11–27 |
Figure 2Internal structure of cellulose.
Common 2,2,6,6–tetramethylpiperidine–1–oxyl radical (TEMPO) oxidation systems.
| TEMPO Oxidation System | pH | Temperature Reflex (°C) | Oxidation Yield (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEMPO/NaClO/NaBr | 10 | Room Temperature | 75–98 | Saito et al. [ |
| TEMPO/NaClO/NaClO2 | 7 | 60 | ≈100 | Saito et al. [ |
| 4–acetamide–TEMPO/NaClO/NaClO2 | 3–7 | 40–60 | 40–70 | Hirota et al. [ |
| 4–acetamide–TEMPO Dielectric Oxidation (0.5 V) | 6–8 | 91–98 | 91–98 | Isogai et al. [ |
| Laccase / TEMPO or Amino TEMPO | 7 | 30 | – | Jiang et al. [ |
| TEMPO/NaClO/Na2 SO4 /NaBr | 10 | Room Temperature | >95 | Inamochi et al. [ |
Figure 3Mechanisms of cellulose carboxymethylation. (a) Two-step oxidation of periodate and sodium chlorite; (b) Carboxymethyl monochloroacetic acid; (c) TEMPO oxidation; (d) Nitric acid oxidation; (e) Oxidation of nitrous oxide/nitrogen dioxide system.
Cellulose pretreatment process.
| Pretreatment Method | Effect on Fiber | Fiber Quality | Industrialization Prospects | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzymatic Hydrolysis | DP Drops, CI Drops | High Degree of Fibrillation, no Functionalization | Excellent | Pääkkö et al. [ |
| TEMPO Oxidation | DP Drops, CI Drops | Functionalize Cellulose and Make the Surface of Cellulose Carry Charges | General | Isogai et al. [ |
| Carboxymethylation | DP Dropped Slightly, CI Basically Had no Effect | Functionalize Cellulose, which is Stronger than Enzymatically Degraded Fiber and Contains More Fiber Fragments | General | Wagberg et al. [ |
| Phosphorylation | DP Drops, CI Basically Has no Effect | Reinforce CNFs Fiber Strength, Impart Flame Retardancy to Fiber and Introduce Negative Charge | Excellent | Maryam et al. [ |
| Cationization | DP Drops, CI Basically Has no Effect | Improve Fiber Dispersion, can make CNFs Products have Good Antibacterial Properties or in Certain Cytotoxicity and introduce Positive Charge | Bad | Odabas et al. [ |
| Periodate Oxidation | DP Drops, CI Drops | Excellent Dispersibility, Fiber Structure and Functionalization | Bad | Sven et al. [ |
| Supercritical Fluid Technology | DP Basically Has no Effect, CI Improve | Promote the Fibrillating of Fiber, Improve the Thermal Performance and Introduce Functional Groups Directly to the Surface of Cellulose | General | Stoja et al. [ |
Figure 4Cellulose nanofibril (CNFs) surface modification examples. (a) Anion luminescent nanocellulose gel [139]; (b) Superhydrophobic modification of cellulose fabric [140]; (c) Cationic modification [141]; (d) Cellulose was esterified and grafted with cyclodextrin [142]; (e) Electrospinning and sulfhydrylated cellulose [143]. Copyright 2019, 2018, 2020, 2017, 2020 respectively. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
Functional applications of nanocellulose and related literature.
| Application Field | Reference |
|---|---|
| Composite Material | Siro et al. [ |
| Sensor | Dong et al. [ |
| Food Packaging | Abdul et al. [ |
| Food Packaging | Amjad et al. [ |
| Capacitor | Zhang et al. [ |
| Conductive Material | Xu et al. [ |
| Fireproof Materials | Costes et al. [ |
| Chemical Substance Detection | Ruiz-Palomero et al. [ |
| Medical | Dumanli et al. [ |
| Magnetic Material | Amiralian et al. [ |
| Engineering Building | Singh et al. [ |