| Literature DB >> 33182529 |
Jinlong Wang1,2, Qi Wang1,2, Yiting Wu1,2, Feitian Bai1,2, Haiqi Wang1,2, Shurun Si1,2, Yongfeng Lu1,2, Xusheng Li1,2, Shuangfei Wang1,2.
Abstract
Due to the natural cellulose encapsulated in both lignin and hemicellulose matrices, as well as in plant cell walls with a compact and complex hierarchy, extracting cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) from lignocellulosic biomass is challenging. In this study, a sustainable high yield strategy with respect to other CNF preparations was developed. The cellulose was liberated from plant cell walls and fibrillated to a 7-22 nm thickness in one bath treatment with H3PO4 and H2O2 under mild conditions. The cellulose underwent swelling, the lignin underwent oxidative degradation, and the hemicellulose and a small amount of cellulose underwent acid hydrolysis. The CNFs' width was about 12 nm, with high yields (93% and 50% based on cellulose and biomass, respectively), and a 64% crystallinity and good thermal stability were obtained from bagasse. The current work suggests a strategy with simplicity, mild conditions, and cost-effectiveness, which means that this method can contribute to sustainable development for the preparation of CNFs.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose nanofibers; hydrolysis; lignocellulosic biomass; oxidation; swelling
Year: 2020 PMID: 33182529 PMCID: PMC7696933 DOI: 10.3390/nano10112227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the extraction of cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) from bagasse by H4PO3 and H2O2 treatment.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the microfibril structure in plant cell walls and the proposed mechanism for CNF preparation. (a) HO+ generated; (b) lignin oxidatively degraded by HO+; (c) cross-section of microfibrils; (d) longitudinal section of microfibrils; and (e) cellulose fibers swell and fibrillate in phosphoric acid solution.
Bagasse was treated with time, temperature, and dosage of H2O2, as well as the yield, chemical component, and removal ratio.
| S.N. | Time | H2O2 | Yield (%) a | Cellulose | Hemicellulose | Lignin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content (%) | Content (%) | Removal (%) | Content (%) | Removal (%) | ||||
| Bagasse | 46.50 ± 1.25 | 27.69 ± 0.84 | 21.42 ± 1.31 | |||||
| 1 | 18/35 | 60 | 49.75/93.36 | 87.36 ± 1.14 | 3.44 ± 0.25 | 96.32 | 7.47 ± 0.87 | 82.65 |
| 2 | 24/35 | 60 | 42.21/85.62 | 94.32 ± 0.61 | 1.32 ± 0.34 | 98.80 | 3.11 ± 0.55 | 93.87 |
| 3 | 36/35 | 60 | 33.95/69.48 | 95.17 ± 0.32 | 0.07 ± 0.04 | 99.95 | 2.53 ± 0.47 | 95.99 |
| 4 | 24/35 | 30 | 58.30/93.22 | 74.35 ± 0.96 | 4.13 ± 0.53 | 91.18 | 20.33 ± 0.83 | 44.53 |
| 5 | 96/5 | 60 | 63.75/99.42 | 72.39 ± 0.74 | 12.73 ± 0.23 | 70.69 | 3.61 ± 0.67 | 88.73 |
a Yield based on the initial amount of biomass/yield based on the initial amount of cellulose in biomass.
Figure 3(a) Untreated bagasse fiber; (b–e) scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of bagasse treated with H3PO4 and H2O2 for 2, 6, 12, and 24 h, respectively (arrow length: fiber width); and (f) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of bagasse treated with H3PO4 and H2O2 for 24 h.
Figure 4(a) Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) image of CNF samples prepared based on the method by poly(ethyleneimine) solution (PEI) substrate adsorption; (b) AFM image of CNF samples prepared based on the method by dropping the suspension; and (c) height distribution and (d) width distribution of the CNFs measured based on AFM images (AH: average height and AW: average width).
Figure 5(a) Degree of polymerization (DP) of the cellulose in CNFs. (b) Degree of phosphorus substitution (DS) of the cellulose.
Figure 6Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the untreated bagasse and CNFs.
Figure 7(a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the bagasse and CNFs. (b) 13C cross-polarization magic angle spinning (13C CPMAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of the bagasse fiber and CNFs.
Resonance distribution of the main peaks in the 13C CPMAS NMR spectra of the bagasse fiber and CNFs.
| Chemical Shift (ppm) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bagasse | CNFs | |
| C1 | 105.22 | 105.09 |
| Crystalline C4 | 88.30 (very small) | 88.59 (major) |
| Amorphous C4 | 84.11 | 84.68 |
| Crystalline C6 | 64.42 | 63.03 |
| Amorphous C6 | 64.89 | 63.19 |
Figure 8Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and DTG curves of the bagasse and CNFs: (a) TGA and (b) DTG.