| Literature DB >> 33181686 |
Xiaoxia Chen1, Guisheng Wang, Lin Zhao, Jingwei Zhao, Ting Liu, Guoquan Zhao, Wenjuan Han.
Abstract
To evaluate the perfusion of coronary circulation and its related factors and the difference in the peak filling times in aortic sinus and coronary sinus by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).From January 1 to August 1, 2018, 61 outpatients with angina pectoris were recruited, completed a questionnaire about risk factors and underwent CCTA, which was also used to assess the stenosis of different coronary artery segments.The duration of circulation was 9.50 ± 2.43 seconds in patients with flat T wave, which was shorter than the duration in normal subjects (P = .021). However, other cardiovascular risk factors showed no effect on the duration of circulation. In addition, the duration of circulation was closely related to the peak filling time of coronary sinus [r(s) = 0.681]. We further divided the circulation time difference (delta) values into 3 levels (<6, 6-12, and ≥12 seconds).It showed that the circulation duration (Y) was associated with:Therefore, the cardiac circulation duration was negatively related to the degree of stenosis in the 1 diagonal and proximal LCA.It compensates for the inability of CCTA to assess circulation at rest simply by determining the peak filling time in the aortic sinus and the coronary sinus. Moderate cardiac microcirculation duration was related to a low incidence of clinical symptoms and electrocardiogram disorders, which was determined mainly by the diagonal and left circumflex branch 1 of LCA.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33181686 PMCID: PMC7668512 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Patients characteristics in relation to myocardial microcirculation.
| Parameter | GroupN = 61 | Delta values (Δ) | |
| Gender, n (%) | Male: 39 (63.9) | 10.00 ± 3.61 | .760a |
| Female: 22 (36.1) | 10.13 ± 3.87 | ||
| Age, n (%) | ≤50: 16 (26.2) | 10.63 ± 3.53 | .770b |
| 51–60: 26 (42.6) | 9.52 ± 3.95 | ||
| 61–70: 15 (24.6) | 10.46 ± 3.87 | ||
| 71–: 4 (6.6) | 9.67 ± 1.49 | ||
| BMI, kg/m2 | ≤23: 17 | 8.69 ± 2.92 | .311b |
| 24.51 ± 2.54 | 23.1–24.9: 23 | 10.88 ± 3.68 | |
| 25–27.9: 14 | 10.13 ± 4.46 | ||
| 28–: 7 | 10.46 ± 3.35 |
Figure 1Example of coronary artery stenosis and circulation duration assessment. (A) and (B) Surface reconstruction (CPR) images of coronary artery show the semiautomatic measurement of the vascular diameter by the software, which could reveal the coronary artery stenosis and its degree. (C) shows the peak filling time of the aortic sinus. (D) shows the peak filling time of the coronary sinus. The region of interest was selected, and the computed tomography values in the aortic sinus and coronary sinus in each group of passes were measured. After all passes were similarly measured in the groups, the scan times corresponding to the group with the highest computed tomography value of the aortic sinus (C) and the coronary sinus (D) were recorded on the AW workstation. The value of circulation duration was defined as the difference between the peak filling time of the aortic sinus (C) and the coronary sinus (D).
Cardiovascular risk factors information of the patients.
| Cardiovascular risk factors | Yes | No | Uncertain | |
| Angina pectoris | 11.46 ± 4.45 [7 (11.5)] | 9.93 ± 3.63 [48 (78.7)] | [6 (9.8)] | .592 |
| Electrocardiogram disorder | 9.50 ± 2.43 [12 (19.7)] | 10.57 ± 4.09 [37 (60.7)] | [12 (19.7)] | .021 |
| CAD family history | 10.97 ± 3.65 [14 (23.0)] | 10.16 ± 3.56 [33 (54.1)] | [14 (23.0)] | .907 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 9.21 ± 3.27 [20 (32.8)] | 10.04 ± 3.78 [34 (55.7)] | [7 (11.5)] | .439 |
| Hypertension | 10.25 ± 3.68 [29 (47.5)] | 9.79 ± 3.70 [30 (49.2)] | [2 (3.3)] | .763 |
| Diabetes | 9.95 ± 3.05 [11 (18.0)] | 10.15 ± 3.88 [48 (78.7)] | [2 (3.3)] | .443 |
| Smoking | 9.96 ± 3.17 [18 (29.5)] | 10.42 ± 3.92 [39 (63.9)] | [4 (6.6)] | .606 |
The correlation analysis on stenosis of different segments of coronary artery, the peak time of artery (vein) and the microcirculation duration.
| Peak time of aortic sinus | Peak time of vein | Microcirculation duration | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4S | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | S13 | S14 | S15 | S16 | S17 | |
| Peak time of aortic sinus | 0.037 (0.777) | –0.040 (0.757) | 0.169 (0.192) | 0.152 (0.242) | 0.306 (0.017) | –0.176 (0.175) | 0.000 (0.999) | –0.049 (0.710) | –0.014 (0.913) | –0.097 (0.455) | 0.032 (0.804) | 0.065 (0.618) | 0.0190 (0.142) | 0.101 (0.437) | 0.155 (0.233) | 0.134 (0.302) | –0.005 (0.969) | –0.077 (0.555) | 0.030 (0.818) | |
| Peak time of vein | 0.037(0.777) | 0.681 (<0.001) | 0.000 (0.994) | 0.109 (0.405) | –0.025 (0.848) | –0.147 (0.259) | 0.021 (0.874) | –0.251 (0.052) | –0.159 (0.220) | 0.106 (0.417) | 0.146 (0.263) | 0.248 (0.054) | –0.061 (0.640) | –0.073 (0.576) | –0.050 (0.702) | 0.033 (0.800) | 0.120 (0.358) | 0.154 (0.236) | 0.113 (0.386) | |
| Microcirculation duration | –0.040(0.757) | 0.681 (<0.001) | 0.000 (0.999) | 0.037 (0.774) | –0.085 (0.517) | –0.220 (0.088) | –0.121 (0.353) | –0.154 (0.237) | –0.180 (0.164) | 0.025 (0.847) | 0.007 (0.959) | 0.155 (0.232) | –0.126 (0.332) | –0.035 (0.788) | –0.099 (0.450) | 0.048 (0.713) | 0.090 (0.491) | 0.087 (0.503) | –0.038 (0.773) |
A. The status of S1, S2, S3, S5, and S12 were associated with peak time of aortic sinus.
| e | S2 (n) | S12 (n) | S5 (n) | S1 (n) | ||
| No stenosis | I | 17.10 ± 2.18III (42) | 17.65 ± 3.03 (45) | 17.69 ± 2.90 (49) | 17.75 ± 2.72 (55) | 17.61 ± 3.17 (37) |
| Artery stenosis (%) | II: <25 | 18.83 ± 1.64 (5) | 18.00 ± 0.28 (2) | 18.16 ± 0.81 (2) | 20.74 (1) | 17.13 ± 1.54 (6) |
| III: 25-50 | 20.49 ± 4.39I,IV (8) | 18.46 ± 1.89 (5) | 18.31 ± 2.00 (6) | 14.63 (1) | 18.77 ± 1.87 (8) | |
| IV: 50-70 | 16.63 ± 1.87III,a (4) | 17.63 ± 1.33 (5) | 17.73 ± 4.38 (2) | 17.64 ± 2.59 (7) | ||
| V: 70-99 | 15.57 (1) | |||||
| VI: >99 | 14.63 (1) |
Figure 2The coronary artery segments. The arteries listed in red were associated with the microcirculation duration.