| Literature DB >> 33180860 |
Astrid Elise Hasselberg1, Laura Wessels2, Inger Aakre1, Felix Reich2, Amy Atter3, Matilda Steiner-Asiedu4, Samuel Amponsah3,5, Johannes Pucher2, Marian Kjellevold1.
Abstract
The triple burden of malnutrition is an incessant issue in low- and middle-income countries, and fish has the potential to mitigate this burden. In Ghana fish is a central part of the diet, but data on nutrients and contaminants in processed indigenous fish species, that are often eaten whole, are missing. Samples of smoked, dried or salted <span class="Species">Engraulis encrasicolus (<Gene">span class="Species">European anchovy), Brachydeuterus auritus (bigeye grunt), Sardinella aurita (round sardinella), Selene dorsalis (African moonfish), Sierrathrissa leonensis (West African (WA) pygmy herring) and Tilapia spp. (tilapia) were collected from five different regions in Ghana. Samples were analyzed for nutrients (crude protein, fat, fatty acids, several vitamins, minerals, and trace elements), microbiological quality (microbial loads of total colony counts, E. coli, coliforms, and Salmonella), and contaminants (PAH4 and heavy metals). Except for tilapia, the processed small fish species had the potential to significantly contribute to the nutrient intakes of vitamins, minerals, and essential fatty acids. High levels of iron, mercury and lead were detected in certain fish samples, which calls for further research and identification of anthropogenic sources along the value chains. The total cell counts in all samples were acceptable; Salmonella was not detected in any sample and E. coli only in one sample. However, high numbers of coliform bacteria were found. PAH4 in smoked samples reached high concentrations up to 1,300 μg/kg, but in contrast salted tilapia samples had a range of PAH4 concentration of 1 μg/kg to 24 μg/kg. This endpoint oriented study provides data for the nutritional value of small processed fish as food in Ghana and also provides information about potential food safety hazards. Future research is needed to determine potential sources of contamination along the value chains in different regions, identify critical points, and develop applicable mitigation strategies to improve the quality and safety of processed small fish in Ghana.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33180860 PMCID: PMC7660496 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Species, habitat, weight and length of fish sampled from five different locations in Ghana.
| Common name | Scientific name | Local name | Habitat | Tissue analyzed | Fish length (cm) | Processing method | Batches | Composite samples (n) | Specimens in each composite sample | Batch/ composite weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amoni, Bonu, Abobi, Saskawesi, Ablobi | Marine, pelagic | Whole fish | 6.3 (5–7.6) | Smoked | 25 | 5 | >250 | 100/500 | ||
| Boeboe, Moe, Hawui, Eboe, Ano kpetei | Marine, benthopelagic | Whole fish without head | 12.4 (11.8–12.9) | Smoked | 15 | 3 | 45 (42–50) | 100/500 | ||
| Antele-wawaa, Ngogba lolotor, Epo edwire, Tantemire ansoradze, Epo edwile, Ndademire | Marine, demersal | Whole fish | 9 (6.6–10.8) | Smoked | 12 | 3 | 75 (35–100) | 100/500 | ||
| Kankama, Man, Vetsimu, Eban | Marine, pelagic | Whole fish | 13.3 (12.7–15.4) | Smoked | 24 | 5 | 49 (33–73) | 100/500 | ||
| Apatire Tidie, Akpaa, Apataa, Koobi | Freshwater, benthopelagic | Whole fish without guts | 11.3 (10.2–12.8) | Salted | 23 | 5 | 43 (22–73) | 100/500 | ||
| One man thousand, Woevi | Freshwater, pelagic | Whole fish | 4.6 (3.4–6) | Dried or smoked | 7 | 3 | 230 (>100–500) | 100/500 |
a Numbers presented as mean and range (min-max).
b Tissue analyzed for nutrients, heavy metals and PAHs.
c Tissue analyzed for microbiological contamination.
d Local names from [59].
e Local names.
Analytical values (means ± standard deviation, wet product weight) for selected nutrients, microbial quality and contaminants of processed whole fish from Ghana.
| Unit | Anchovy | Bigeye grunt | Round sardinella | African moonfish | WA pygmy herring | Tilapia | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | 8.45±1.31AB | 8.22±1.77AB | 7.92±1.75A | 10.36±1.66AB | 7.87±2.04AB | 28.50±7.96B | 0.019 | ||
| g/100g | 71.80±2.05A | 64.33±1.53B | 64.80±3.19B | 67.67±1.53AB | 67.67±3.06AB | 31.80±3.90C | <0.001 | ||
| g/100g | 6.44±0.77A | 15.03±3.80AB | 13.84±1.29B | 6.37±0.97A | 12.23±3.38AB | 7.02±2.11A | 0.001 | ||
| g/100g (%) | 2.00±0.47A (37) | 5.16±1.44B (38) | 4.94±0.77B (33) | 1.99±0.21A (38) | 4.02±0.78BC (39) | 2.93±0.38AC (41) | <0.001 | ||
| g/100g (%) | 0.75±0.13A (14) | 3.20±1.01B (24) | 2.48±0.52AB (26) | 0.92±0.10AB (18) | 2.86±0.97B (27) | 2.06±0.36AB (28) | 0.003 | ||
| g/100g (%) | 2.33±0.58AB (43) | 4.25±1.04C (32) | 3.98±0.58C (35) | 1.92±0.20AB (37) | 3.12±0.63AC (30) | 1.68±0.17B (23) | <0.001 | ||
| g/100g (%) | 0.41±0.13AB (7) | 0.77±0.26B (6) | 0.82±0.17B (7) | 0.34±0.07AB (6) | 0.29±0.06AB (3) | 0.04±0.01A (1) | 0.001 | ||
| g/100g (%) | 1.41±0.32A (26) | 2.21±0.47B (16) | 2.01±0.30B (16) | 1.04±0.12AC (20) | 0.77±0.22CD (8) | 0.18±0.06D (3) | <0.001 | ||
| μg/100g | 14±3AB | 9±1A | 23±1B | 14±1A | 16±6AB | 11±3A | 0.014 | ||
| μg/100g | 12±3AB | 15±6AB | 34±9A | 9±3B | 17±10AB | 13±4AB | 0.024 | ||
| μg/100g | 14±15AB | 323±153B | 10±3AB | 290±46B | 39±28AB | 4±8A | 0.004 | ||
| mg/100g | 2940±207AB | 3533±577ABC | 3040±207B | 5467±153C | 2633±379AB | 2900±436AB | 0.026 | ||
| mg/100g | 25±6A | 22±9AB | 19±3A | 50±12AB | 78±89AB | 10±3B | 0.010 | ||
| mg/100g | 6.3±0.9ABC | 3.4±0.4BC | 5.1±0.2ABC | 4.9±1.0ABC | 14.7±2.9A | 4.3±0.6BC | 0.003 | ||
| μg/100g | 192±28A | 113±12B | 242±37A | 173±15A | 94±15BC | 33±7C | <0.001 | ||
| μg/100g | 170±48A | 219±122A | 142±31AB | 233±25A | 129±74AB | 49±11B | 0.002 | ||
| log CFU/g | 5.06±0.74A | 4.58±0.23A | 4.62±0.52A | 4.93±0.30A | 6.15±0.74A | 4.23±0.64A | 0.077 | ||
| log CFU/g | 4.36±0.92A | 3.67±0.42A | 4.05±0.92A | 3.98±0.27A | NAA | 4.43±1.01A | 0.505 | ||
| log CFU/g | 2.73±0.85A | 2.86±1.05A | 2.93±1.19A | 2.69±0.07A | 3.12±1.28A | <LODA | 0.639 | ||
| μg/kg | 478±164AB | 553±155A | 418±103AB | 443±91AB | 600±666AB | 7±10B | 0.034 | ||
| mg/kg | 0.306±0.053A | 0.116±0.016BC | 0.186±0.031B | 0.065±0.019CD | 0.015±0.004D | <LOQD | <0.001 | ||
| mg/kg | 0.13±0.06A | 0.16±0.11A | 0.10±0.04A | 0.24±0.10A | 0.64±0.61A | <LOQA | 0.059 | ||
| mg/kg | 0.034±0.006AB | 0.065±0.014A | 0.034±0.009AB | 0.045±0.013AB | 0.223±0.127A | <LOQB | 0.003 | ||
| mg/kg | 7.8±1.9A | 4.9±0.6A | 9.8±3.0A | 5.7±1.4AB | 0.9±0.6B | 0.1±0.0B | <0.001 | ||
Different superscript capital letters indicate statistical significance with p-value below 0.05.
Fig 1Total Colony Counts (TCC), counts of coliform bacteria (coliforms) and the acceptable limit (m, 5.7 log CFU/g) for TCC, the rejection limit for TCC (M, 7 log CFU/g) and the rejection limit for coliforms (M, 1.6 log CFU/g) by the Ghana Standards Authority (GS 95:2013).
I: Accra; II: Techiman; III: Tamale; IV: Kumasi; V: Bolgatanga.
Fig 2