| Literature DB >> 32422957 |
Amalie Moxness Reksten1, Avelina M Joao Correia Victor2, Edia Baptista Nascimento Neves2, Sofie Myhre Christiansen1, Molly Ahern3, Abimbola Uzomah4, Anne-Katrine Lundebye1, Jeppe Kolding5, Marian Kjellevold1.
Abstract
Fish is a rich source ofEntities:
Keywords: Angola; contaminants; exposure assessment; fish; food composition data; marine; metals; minerals; nutrients; recommended nutrient intake
Year: 2020 PMID: 32422957 PMCID: PMC7278876 DOI: 10.3390/foods9050629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Identification details and overview of fish species sampled from Angola.
| Scientific Name a | Common Name a | Local Name | Habitat a | Weight (g) b | Length (cm) b | Number of Composite Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| False scad | Chicharro amarelo | Benthopelagic | 244 (210–314) | 27.5 (26.5–30.5) | 5 |
|
| Smooth puffer | Baiacu | Pelagic | 734 (429–1360) | 38.2 (32.5–44) | 5 |
|
| Round sardinella | Lombuda | Pelagic | 198 (176–237) | 27.6 (26.5–29) | 5 |
|
| Madeiran sardinella | Pallheta | Pelagic | 131 (116–151) | 25.5 (25–27) | 5 |
|
| Guachanche barracuda | Barracuda | Pelagic-neritic | 509 (339–795) | 46.4 (41.5–53) | 5 |
|
| Cunene horse mackerel | Carapau do Cunene | Benthopelagic | 200 (173–240) | 26.1 (24.5–29) | 5 |
a Scientific name, common name, and habitat confirmed using the global species database, FishBase [33]. b Weight and length measurements are expressed as the mean values for the 25 fish and the range (minimum–maximum). Weight was measured before the cleaning of the fish. c Analytical values for this species are further presented in the Supplementary Materials due to the species’ irrelevance for local food consumption.
Description of food products used for comparison to the sampled species and their edible product conversion factors a.
| Food | Product Description | Edible Conversion Dactor |
|---|---|---|
|
| Light meat with skin, raw | 1 |
|
| Meat, moderately fat (ca. 20% fat), raw | 1 |
|
| Meat, moderately fat (ca. 20% fat), raw | 1 |
|
| Cow, whole, 3.5% fat (pasteurised or UHT) | 1 |
|
| Chicken, raw | 0.87 |
a Products derived from the FAO/INFOODS Food Composition Table for Western Africa (2019) [28].
Analytical values of the proximate composition of fish species from Angola a.
| Species |
| Moisture | Protein | Lipid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | g/100 g | g/100 g | ||
|
| 5 | 73.2 ± 0.3 | 23 ± 0.0 | 2.20 ± 0.3 |
|
| 5 | 69.8 ± 0.8 | 21 ± 0.5 | 5.40 ± 2.2 |
|
| 5 | 74.2 ± 0.7 | 21 ± 0.4 | 2.33 ± 0.5 |
|
| 5 | 75.5 ± 0.6 | 21 ± 0.4 | 2.12 ± 0.8 |
|
| 5 | 70.8 ± 1.1 | 21 ± 0.4 | 6.98 ± 1.1 |
|
| 72.7 ± 2.3 | 21 ± 1.0 | 3.81 ± 2.3 |
a Values are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD) of the fish species analysed in triplicate, expressed as the nutrient content per 100 g of raw, edible sample. b Number of pooled samples analysed. Each pooled sample consisted of 5 individual fish.
Concentrations of minerals and trace elements in fish species from Angola a.
| Species |
| Ca | Fe | I | K | Mg | Na | P | Se | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/100 g | mg/100 g | µg/100 g | mg/100 g | mg/100 g | mg/100 g | mg/100 g | µg/100 g | mg/100 g | ||
|
| 5 | 25.8 ± 18 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 22.0 ± 1.1 | 480 ± 7.1 | 37.4 ± 0.5 | 50 ± 0.8 | 294 ± 8.9 | 29.4 ± 1.7 | 0.47 ± 0.04 |
|
| 5 | 71.2 ± 9.4 | 1.84 ± 0.15 | 23.8 ± 2.7 | 510 ± 10 | 37.6 ± 0.5 | 45 ± 1.6 | 344 ± 8.9 | 37.0 ± 2.2 | 0.52 ± 0.02 |
|
| 5 | 89.6 ± 9.9 | 1.52 ± 0.18 | 35.0 ± 4.8 | 528 ± 13 | 39.2 ± 0.8 | 47 ± 3.5 | 340 ± 7.1 | 50.4 ± 0.5 | 0.56 ± 0.07 |
|
| 5 | 20.4 ± 3.6 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | 46.6 ± 3.6 | 478 ± 128 | 38.2 ± 0.8 | 45 ± 2.3 | 310 ± 7.1 | 26.2 ± 1.5 | 0.33 ± 0.01 |
|
| 5 | 24.6 ± 7.0 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | 27.2 ± 1.3 | 456 ± 11 | 35.0 ± 0.7 | 65 ± 1.1 | 284 ± 5.5 | 38.2 ± 1.8 | 0.42 ± 0.03 |
|
| 46.3 ± 31 | 1.04 ± 0.56 | 31.0 ± 9.6 | 490 ± 60 | 37.5 ± 1.6 | 50 ± 7.8 | 314 ± 26 | 36.2 ± 8.7 | 0.46 ± 0.09 |
a Values are presented as means ± SD for the fish species analysed in triplicate, expressed as the nutrient content per 100 g of raw, edible sample. b Number of pooled samples analysed. Each pooled sample consisted of 5 fish.
Figure 1The contribution of calcium, iodine, iron, and zinc (in percentage) to the recommended nutrient intake (RNI) for women of reproductive age, from the consumption of a 50 g portion fillet of the various fish species.
Figure 2The contribution of calcium, iodine, iron, and zinc (in percentage) to the recommended nutrient intake (RNI) for infants during the first 1000 days of life, from the consumption of a 25 g portion fillet of the various fish species.
Figure 3The contribution of protein, calcium, iron, and zinc (in percentage) to the recommended nutrient intakes (RNI) for women, from the consumption of a 50 g portion fillet of the sampled fish species and various terrestrial animal food products.
Concentrations of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb) in fish from Angola (mean ± SD).
| Species |
| As | Cd | Hg | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/kg w.w. | mg/kg w.w. | mg/kg w.w. | mg/kg w.w. | ||
|
| 5 | 1.54 ± 0.09 | 0.004 ± 0.002 | 0.022 ± 0.002 | 0.006 ± 0.000 |
|
| 5 | 1.78 ± 0.20 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 0.014 ± 0.007 | 0.007 ± 0.000 |
|
| 5 | 2.10 ± 0.25 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.046 ± 0.010 | 0.010 ± 0.002 |
|
| 5 | 0.56 ± 0.11 | 0.001 ± 0.000 | 0.170 ± 0.058 | 0.005 ± 0.001 |
|
| 5 | 2.26 ± 0.05 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 0.026 ± 0.007 | 0.006 ± 0.001 |
|
| 1.65 ± 0.63 | 0.003 ± 0.002 | 0.056 ± 0.064 | 0.007 ± 0.002 |
a Number of pooled samples analysed. Each pooled sample consisted of 5 fish.
Figure 4Potential consumer exposure to methylmercury (MeHg) and cadmium (Cd) for adults when a portion of 50 g fish fillet is consumed one time per week and every day for a month for MeHg and Cd, respectively. The potential consumer exposure is compared to the provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) for MeHg and provisional tolerable monthly intake (PTMI) for Cd, as set by the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA).
Figure 5Potential consumer exposure to methylmercury (MeHg) and cadmium (Cd) for children when a portion of 25 g fish fillet is consumed one time per week and every day for a month for MeHg and Cd, respectively. The potential consumer exposure is compared to the provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) for MeHg and provisional tolerable monthly intake (PTMI) for Cd, as set by the JECFA.