Eric J Lenze1, Caline Mattar2, Charles F Zorumski1, Angela Stevens1, Julie Schweiger1, Ginger E Nicol1, J Philip Miller3, Lei Yang1, Michael Yingling1, Michael S Avidan4, Angela M Reiersen1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 3. Division of Biostatistics, Informatics Institute, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
Importance: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may lead to serious illness as a result of an excessive immune response. Fluvoxamine may prevent clinical deterioration by stimulating the σ-1 receptor, which regulates cytokine production. Objective: To determine whether fluvoxamine, given during mild COVID-19 illness, prevents clinical deterioration and decreases the severity of disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blind, randomized, fully remote (contactless) clinical trial of fluvoxamine vs placebo. Participants were community-living, nonhospitalized adults with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, with COVID-19 symptom onset within 7 days and oxygen saturation of 92% or greater. One hundred fifty-two participants were enrolled from the St Louis metropolitan area (Missouri and Illinois) from April 10, 2020, to August 5, 2020. The final date of follow-up was September 19, 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg of fluvoxamine (n = 80) or placebo (n = 72) 3 times daily for 15 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was clinical deterioration within 15 days of randomization defined by meeting both criteria of (1) shortness of breath or hospitalization for shortness of breath or pneumonia and (2) oxygen saturation less than 92% on room air or need for supplemental oxygen to achieve oxygen saturation of 92% or greater. Results: Of 152 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 46 [13] years; 109 [72%] women), 115 (76%) completed the trial. Clinical deterioration occurred in 0 of 80 patients in the fluvoxamine group and in 6 of 72 patients in the placebo group (absolute difference, 8.7% [95% CI, 1.8%-16.4%] from survival analysis; log-rank P = .009). The fluvoxamine group had 1 serious adverse event and 11 other adverse events, whereas the placebo group had 6 serious adverse events and 12 other adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: In this preliminary study of adult outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19, patients treated withfluvoxamine, compared with placebo, had a lower likelihood of clinical deterioration over 15 days. However, the study is limited by a small sample size and short follow-up duration, and determination of clinical efficacy would require larger randomized trials with more definitive outcome measures. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04342663.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may lead to serious illness as a result of an excessive immune response. Fluvoxamine may prevent clinical deterioration by stimulating the σ-1 receptor, which regulates cytokine production. Objective: To determine whether fluvoxamine, given during mild COVID-19 illness, prevents clinical deterioration and decreases the severity of disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blind, randomized, fully remote (contactless) clinical trial of fluvoxamine vs placebo. Participants were community-living, nonhospitalized adults with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, with COVID-19 symptom onset within 7 days and oxygen saturation of 92% or greater. One hundred fifty-two participants were enrolled from the St Louis metropolitan area (Missouri and Illinois) from April 10, 2020, to August 5, 2020. The final date of follow-up was September 19, 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg of fluvoxamine (n = 80) or placebo (n = 72) 3 times daily for 15 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was clinical deterioration within 15 days of randomization defined by meeting both criteria of (1) shortness of breath or hospitalization for shortness of breath or pneumonia and (2) oxygen saturation less than 92% on room air or need for supplemental oxygen to achieve oxygen saturation of 92% or greater. Results: Of 152 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 46 [13] years; 109 [72%] women), 115 (76%) completed the trial. Clinical deterioration occurred in 0 of 80 patients in the fluvoxamine group and in 6 of 72 patients in the placebo group (absolute difference, 8.7% [95% CI, 1.8%-16.4%] from survival analysis; log-rank P = .009). The fluvoxamine group had 1 serious adverse event and 11 other adverse events, whereas the placebo group had 6 serious adverse events and 12 other adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: In this preliminary study of adult outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19, patients treated with fluvoxamine, compared with placebo, had a lower likelihood of clinical deterioration over 15 days. However, the study is limited by a small sample size and short follow-up duration, and determination of clinical efficacy would require larger randomized trials with more definitive outcome measures. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04342663.
Authors: Adam Hosszu; Zsuzsanna Antal; Lilla Lenart; Judit Hodrea; Sandor Koszegi; Dora B Balogh; Nora F Banki; Laszlo Wagner; Adam Denes; Peter Hamar; Peter Degrell; Adam Vannay; Attila J Szabo; Andrea Fekete Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Magnus Christensen; Gunnel Tybring; Kazuo Mihara; Norio Yasui-Furokori; Juan Antonio Carrillo; Sara I Ramos; Katarina Andersson; Marja-Liisa Dahl; Leif Bertilsson Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Daniel B Chastain; Sharmon P Osae; Andrés F Henao-Martínez; Carlos Franco-Paredes; Joeanna S Chastain; Henry N Young Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dorian A Rosen; Scott M Seki; Anthony Fernández-Castañeda; Rebecca M Beiter; Jacob D Eccles; Judith A Woodfolk; Alban Gaultier Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Lindsay A Thompson; Matthew J Gurka; Stephanie L Filipp; Desmond A Schatz; Rebeccah E Mercado; David A Ostrov; Mark A Atkinson; Sonja A Rasmussen Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-06-04
Authors: Nicolas Hoertel; Marina Sánchez-Rico; Erich Gulbins; Johannes Kornhuber; Alexander Carpinteiro; Eric J Lenze; Angela M Reiersen; Miriam Abellán; Pedro de la Muela; Raphaël Vernet; Carlos Blanco; Céline Cougoule; Nathanaël Beeker; Antoine Neuraz; Philip Gorwood; Jesús M Alvarado; Pierre Meneton; Frédéric Limosin Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 6.903