| Literature DB >> 33178365 |
Brigitte Lemyre1,2, Jaya P Bodani3,4, Stefani Doucette5, Michael S Dunn6, Deepak Louis7, Luis Monterrosa8, Amit Mukerji9, Georg M Schmölzer10,11, Prakeshkumar Shah12, Balpreet Singh13,14, Jonathan Wong15, Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil5, Martin Offringa16.
Abstract
To be time and resource efficient in neonatal research and to answer clinically relevant questions with validity and generalizability, large numbers of infants from multiple hospitals need to be included. Multijurisdictional research in Canada is currently fraught with research ethics review process hurdles that lead to delays, administrative costs, and possibly termination of projects. We describe our experience applying for ethics review to 13 sites in 7 provinces for a project comparing two standard of care therapies for preterm born infants with respiratory distress syndrome. We welcome the current opportunity created by the Institute of Human Development Child and Youth Health and the Institute for Genetics, to collaboratively identify practical solutions that would benefit Canadian researchers, Research Ethics Boards, and children and families.Entities:
Keywords: Multicenter research; neonatology; research ethics review
Year: 2019 PMID: 33178365 PMCID: PMC7606166 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxz160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Paediatr Child Health ISSN: 1205-7088 Impact factor: 2.253