| Literature DB >> 33178141 |
Elizabeth M Ogata1, Michelle A Baker1, Emma J Rosi2, Trevor B Smart3, Donald Long4, Zachary T Aanderud3.
Abstract
BactEntities:
Keywords: bacteria; contaminant diffusing substrate; nutrients; pharmaceuticals; stream biofilms; water quality
Year: 2020 PMID: 33178141 PMCID: PMC7593328 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.526545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Krona plots of biofilm bacterial cores in control, nutrient (Nu), pharmaceutical (Ph), and nutrient plus pharmaceutical (NuPh) treatments in montane streams. Bacterial cores defined as OTUs present in more than 75% of samples of a given contaminant treatment in montane streams across the three catchments. Inner rings, in order from smallest to largest, show percentages of individual taxa at phylum, class, order, and family levels and colors indicate different phyla. The outer ring shows the percentage of individual taxa at the OTU level and colors indicate abundant (≥0.1% relative abundance of total bacterial community) and rare OTUs (<0.1% relative abundance of total bacterial community). To simplify Krona plots, we only included taxa belonging to eight most abundant phyla across all bacterial cores, which comprised at least 99% of the abundance of bacterial cores at montane sites. Bacterial cores based on 16S rRNA gene community libraries (97% similarity cut-off). Top families are labeled with the following abbreviations: Comam. = Comamonadaceae, Flavo. = Flavobacteriaceae, Oscilla. = Oscillatoriales, and Pseudo. = Pseudomonadaceae.
FIGURE 2Krona plots of biofilm bacterial cores on control, nutrient (Nu), pharmaceutical (Ph), and nutrient plus pharmaceutical (NuPh) treatments at urban sites. Krona plots are described in Figure 1. The eight phyla comprised at least 99% of the abundance of bacterial cores at urban sites. Top families are labeled with the following abbreviations: Comam. = Comamonadaceae, Flavo. = Flavobacteriaceae, Oscilla. = Oscillatoriales, and Pseudo. = Pseudomonadaceae.
FIGURE 3Venn diagrams of shared and unique bacterial core OTUs in control, nutrient (Nu), pharmaceutical (Ph), and nutrient plus pharmaceutical (NuPh) treatments in montane (left diagram) and urban streams (right diagram). Values are the number of OTUs in each section and section areas are proportional to the number of OTUs. Bacterial cores in montane streams contained a total of 611 OTUs and bacterial cores in urban streams contained a total of 959 OTUs.
FIGURE 4Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) generated using Bray–Curtis distances on a sample × OTU matrix of 16S rRNA gene community libraries. Bacterial cores in control, nutrient addition, pharmaceutical addition, and nutrient plus pharmaceutical addition treatments are represented as different shapes with montane and urban streams in the Logan, Red Butte (RB), and Middle Provo (Provo) catchments represented as different colors.
FIGURE 5Richness of bacterial cores in control, nutrient addition, pharmaceutical addition, and nutrient plus pharmaceutical addition treatments in montane (left panel) and urban streams (right panel). Values are means (n = 8–9) shown with standard error of the mean. In two-way ANOVAs, nutrients and pharmaceuticals had interactive effects on bacterial core richness, with nutrients decreasing and pharmaceuticals increasing richness in montane (Nu addition × Ph addition, F1,24 = 11.7, p = 0.002; Nu addition, F1,24 = 677, p < 0.001; Ph addition, F1,24 = 70.6, p < 0.001) and urban streams (Nu addition × Ph addition, F1,22 = 188, p < 0.001; Nu addition, F1,22 = 846, p < 0.001; Ph addition, F1,22 = 64.7, p < 0.001). All treatments were significantly different within each type of land-use.
FIGURE 6Krona plots of unique taxa in bacterial cores in control, nutrient (Nu), pharmaceutical (Ph), and nutrient plus pharmaceutical (NuPh) treatments in urban streams. Rings, in order from smallest to largest, show percentages of individual taxa at phylum, class, order, family, and OTU levels. Colors indicate different phyla. Note that the phyla and color key are different from those in Figures 1, 2. To simplify Krona plots, we only included taxa belonging to eight most abundant phyla of unique taxa, which comprised at least 96% of the abundance of unique taxa. Top families of unique taxa in each bacterial core are labeled using the following abbreviations: Aero. = Aeromonadaceae, Chitin. = Chitinophagaceae, Cyto. = Cytophagaceae, DR-16 = DR-16 family, env.OPS 17 = Sphingobacteriales env.OPS 17, Lepto. = Leptotrichiaceae, Morax. = Moraxellaceae, OM190 = OM190 family, Oscilla. = Oscillatoriales, Plancto. = Planctomycetaceae, WCHB1-32 = WCHB1-32 family, Xantho. = Xanthomonadaceae.
Ambient nutrient concentrations in montane and urban streams in the Logan River, Red Butte Creek, and Middle Provo River catchments during 2015 CES bioassays.
| Logan River | Red Butte Creek | Middle Provo River | ||||
| Montane | Urban | Montane | Urban | Montane | Urban | |
| TN (mg L–1) | 0.22 (0.032) | 0.41 (0.008) | 0.10 (0.015) | 0.31 (0.015) | 0.19 (0.002) | 0.31 (0.002) |
| TP (mg L–1) | 0.02 (0.004) | 0.02 (0.004) | 0.03 (0.008) | 0.08 (0.001) | 0.01 (<0.001) | 0.03 (<0.001) |
| < 0.01 (0.002) | 0.01 (0.001) | 0.01 (0.001) | 0.01 (<0.001) | 0.01 (<0.001) | 0.01 (0.002) | |
| 0.14 (0.002) | 0.28 (0.001) | 0.04 (<0.001) | 0.10 (0.002) | 0.05 (<0.001) | 0.11 (0.002) | |
| SRP (mg L–1) | <0.01 (<0.001) | <0.01 (<0.001) | 0.01 (<0.001) | 0.01 (<0.001) | <0.01 (0.002) | 0.01 (<0.001) |
| Molar TN:TP | 21.8 (0.87) | 49.4 (10.10) | 8.3 (1.16) | 8.80 (0.34) | 70.5 (0.57) | 21.7 (<0.01) |
| Molar DIN:SRP | 112 (9.09) | 186 (18.3) | 19.8 (1.72) | 23.0 (0.25) | 45.1 (23.12) | 31.9 (2.02) |
| Dissolved total Fe (μg L–1) | 8.57 (<0.001) | 16.3 (7.76) | 8.57 (<0.001) | 31.9 (2.13) | 41.1 (2.84) | 12 (9.59) |
| Dissolved ferrous Fe (μg L–1) | 8.57 (<0.001) | 8.57 (<0.001) | 8.57 (<0.001) | 20.23 (11.7) | 8.57 (<0.001) | 8.57 (<0.001) |
Concentrations of pharmaceuticals that accumulated in Polar Organic Chemical Integrated Samplers (POCIS) in urban streams in the Logan River, Red Butte Creek, Middle Provo River catchments during summer (June–July) and fall [September (Sept.)–October (Oct.)].
| Logan river | Red butte creek | Middle provo river | ||||
| Compound | June 18–July 14 | Sept. 13–Oct. 10 | June 5–June 25 | Sept. 14–Oct. 10 | June 12–July 6 | Sept. 27–Oct. 23 |
| 1,7-Dimethylxanthine | BDL | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Acetaminophen | BDL | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Amphetamine | 0.03 | 0.10 | BDL | 0.35 | BDL | BDL |
| Azithromycin | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL |
| Caffeine | 1.52 | 1.51 | 1.98 | 4.89 | 0.45 | 0.55 |
| Carbamazepine | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | BDL | 0.12 | 0.08 |
| Cimetidine | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL |
| Cotinine | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Diphenhydramine | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | BDL | BDL | BDL |
| MDA | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL |
| MDMA | 0.01 | <0.01 | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL |
| Methamphetamine | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.58 | BDL | BDL |
| Morphine | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL |
| Phenazone | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL |
| Sulfachloropyridazine | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL |
| Sulfamethazine | 0.58 | 0.58 | BDL | BDL | 0.65 | 0.17 |
| Sulfamethoxazole | BDL | 0.28 | BDL | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Thiabendazole | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL |
FIGURE 7Chlorophyll a concentrations (A) and ash-free dry mass (B) of biofilms grown on control, nutrient addition, pharmaceutical addition, and nutrient plus pharmaceutical addition treatments in urban streams. Values are means ± SEM (n = 3). Treatments with different lowercase letters were significantly different from each other (all p ≤ 0.03).