| Literature DB >> 33177920 |
Constanza Marini-Macouzet1, Luis Muñoz1, Aldo Gonzalez-Rubio1, Luis E Eguiarte1, Valeria Souza1, Patricia Velez1,2.
Abstract
Fungal ecological interactions play a key role in structuring community assemblages. These associations may involve both antagonistic and synergistic relationships, which are commonly influenced by abiotic factors such as nutrient conditions. However, information for extreme, oligotrophic systems remain poor. Herein, interactions among key members of the aquatic transient fungal community (Aspergillus niger, pan> class="Species">Cladosporium sp., and Coprinellus micaceus) of a low-nutrient freshwater system in the Cuatro Ciénegas Basin, Mexico were studied. Pairwise interaction bioassays were explored in vitro under different nutrient conditions, including carbohydrates-rich, carbohydrates and amino peptides-rich, and low nutrients. Our results indicated that antagonistic patterns prevail among the studied taxa. However, nutrient-dependent changes were observed in Cladosporium sp. shifting to synergy under carbohydrates-rich conditions, suggesting changes in the fungal community composition as a result of nutrient enrichment. Remarkably, our findings contrast with previous work demonstrating mainly synergistic interactions between our tested fungal isolates and co-occurring autochthonous bacteria (Aeromonas spp. and Vibrio sp.) under low-nutrient conditions. This observation may indicate that bacteria and fungi exhibit distinct community-level responses, driven by nutrient conditions. This contributes to the knowledge of fungal community dynamics and interspecific interactions in an oligotrophic ecosystem, highlighting the relevance of nutrient-based shifts and antagonistic interactions in ecosystem dynamics.Entities:
Keywords: Arid ecosystem; ecosystem dynamics; fungus–fungus interaction; inhibition index
Year: 2020 PMID: 33177920 PMCID: PMC7580559 DOI: 10.1080/12298093.2020.1788271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycobiology ISSN: 1229-8093 Impact factor: 1.858
Information of the analyzed fungi isolated from a water sample collected in an oligotrophic desert oasis (N 26° 50′ 55.2′′, W 102° 08′ 34.8′′).
| Accession number | Fungi | Nomenclature | Strain name | Isolation media |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KY548384 | CO | Cu | PDA | |
| KY548383 | CL | Ta | PDA | |
| KY548382 | AS | Pu | CMA |
Figure 1.Fungal growth in test plates (co-cultures) and controls (mono-cultures) on three different culture media, x-axis represents days and y-axis signifies fungal radial growth (cm2). Controls (A, B, and C) and test plates on: PDA (D–F), CP (G–I), and MM (J–L); where D, G, and J show A. niger in co-culture; E, H, and K show Cladosporium sp. in co-culture; F, I, and L show C. micaceus in co-culture.
Figure 2.Culture characteristics during intra- and interspecific microfungal pairwise interactions on different culture media: PDA, CP, and MM. Controls: Aspergillus niger (1, 10, 19), Coprinellus micaceus (2, 11, 20), Cladosporium sp. (3, 12, 21). Interactions: A. niger vs A. niger (4, 13, 22), C. micaceus vs. C. micaceus (5, 14, 23), Cladosporium sp. vs. Cladosporium sp. (6, 15, 24), A. niger vs. Cladosporium sp. (7, 16, 25), A. niger vs. C. micaceus (8, 17, 26), C. micaceus vs Cladosporium sp. (9, 18, 27). Front (a) and back (b) of the petri dish.
Overall antagonism index for each fungal species on the three tested culture media: carbohydrates-rich potato dextrose agar medium (PDA), carbohydrates and amino peptides-rich medium (CP), low-nutrient marine agar medium (MM).
| Fungi | Culture media | OAI |
|---|---|---|
| PDA | 17.83 | |
| CP | 36.26 | |
| MM | 106.25 | |
| PDA | 107.37 | |
| CP | 103.95 | |
| MM | 126.00 | |
| PDA | 168.73 | |
| CP | 167.17 | |
| MM | 249.14 |
Fungal percentage of inhibition index (PII) on the three tested culture media: carbohydrates-rich potato dextrose agar medium (PDA), carbohydrates and amino peptides-rich medium (CP), low-nutrient marine agar medium (MM). Values are presented in the same order as the interacting organisms.
| Fungi | Culture Media | PII | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDA | 57.84 | 8.43 | |
| CP | 20.17 | 14.98 | |
| MM | 31.18 | 15.61 | |
| PDA | 41.75 | 40.86 | |
| CP | 40.00 | 41.23 | |
| MM | 73.12 | 57.86 | |
| PDA | 16.34 | 77.20 | |
| CP | 6.74 | 75.09 | |
| MM | 73.12 | 57.86 | |
| PDA | 28.90 | 30.59 | |
| CP | 27.19 | 41.27 | |
| MM | 65.69 | 66.16 | |
| PDA | −22.00 | 25.79 | |
| CP | 5.50 | 8.99 | |
| MM | 24.84 | 25.69 | |
| PDA | 7.77 | 32.03 | |
| CP | 1.61 | 23.63 | |
| MM | 24.54 | 59.43 | |
These treatments lack replicates.
Figure 3.Schematic representation of fungal interactions in co-culture on PDA (A), CP (B), and MM (C), where Aspergillus niger is represented as AS, Cladosporium sp. as CL, and Coprinellus micaceus as CO. Red lines indicate antagonism, black lines neutral interactions, and green lines synergistic interactions. Line width is proportional to the intensity of interactions.