Literature DB >> 33177340

Alterations in Ki67 Labeling Following Treatment of Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.

Monika Vyas1, Laura H Tang, Natasha Rekhtman, David S Klimstra.   

Abstract

Assessment of the Ki67 index is critical for grading well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD-NETs), which can show a broad range of labeling that defines the WHO grade (G1-G3). Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (PD-NECs) have a relatively high Ki67 index, >20% in all cases and commonly exceeding 50%. After anecdotally observing PD-NECs with an unexpectedly low and heterogeneous Ki67 index following chemotherapy in 5 cases, we identified 15 additional cases of treated high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NENs). The study cohort comprised 20 cases; 11 PD-NECs, 8 mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas, and 1 WD-NET, G3 from various anatomic sites (gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, larynx, lung, and breast). The Ki67 index was evaluated on pretreatment (when available) and posttreatment samples. Topographic heterogeneity in the Ki67 index was expressed using a semi-quantitative score of 0 (no heterogeneity) to 5 (>80% difference between maximal Ki67 and minimal Ki67 indices). Relative to the pretreatment group (n=9, mean Ki67 of 86.3%, range 80% to 100%), the neoplasms in the posttreatment group (n=20, mean Ki67 of 47.7%, range 1% to 90%) showed a significantly lower Ki67 index (18/20 cases). Of the 18 cases with a relatively low Ki67 index, 15 showed heterogeneous labeling (mean heterogeneity score of 2.3, range 1 to 5) and in 3 cases it was a homogeneously low. This phenomenon was observed in all subtypes of HG-NENs. In 6 cases, the alterations in Ki67 index following treatment were sufficient to place these HG-NENs in the WHO G1 or G2 grade, erroneously suggesting a diagnosis of WD-NET, and in 9 cases there was sufficient heterogeneity in the Ki67 index to suggest that a limited biopsy may sample an area of low Ki67, even though hotspot regions with a Ki67 index of >20% persisted. In 7 cases, the alterations in the Ki67 index were accompanied by morphologic features resembling a WD-NET. These observations suggest that there is a potential for misinterpretation of previously treated PD-NECs as WD-NETs, or for assigning a lower grade in G3 WD-NETs. While the prognostic significance of treatment-associated alterations in Ki67 index is unknown, awareness of this phenomenon is important to avoid this diagnostic pitfall when evaluating treated NENs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33177340      PMCID: PMC8549487          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  20 in total

1.  Small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas are genetically similar and distinct from well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Shinichi Yachida; Efsevia Vakiani; Catherine M White; Yi Zhong; Tyler Saunders; Richard Morgan; Roeland F de Wilde; Anirban Maitra; Jessica Hicks; Angelo M Demarzo; Chanjuan Shi; Rajni Sharma; Daniel Laheru; Barish H Edil; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Laura H Tang; David S Klimstra; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  The high-grade (WHO G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor category is morphologically and biologically heterogenous and includes both well differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms.

Authors:  Olca Basturk; Zhaohai Yang; Laura H Tang; Ralph H Hruban; Volkan Adsay; Chad M McCall; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Kee-Taek Jang; Wendy L Frankel; Serdar Balci; Carlie Sigel; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Mixed Neuroendocrine-Nonneuroendocrine Neoplasms (MiNENs): Unifying the Concept of a Heterogeneous Group of Neoplasms.

Authors:  Stefano La Rosa; Fausto Sessa; Silvia Uccella
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.943

4.  Morphological effects of chemotherapy on ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  W G McCluggage; R W Lyness; R J Atkinson; S P Dobbs; I Harley; H R McClelland; J H Price
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Dichotomy, Origin and Classifications.

Authors:  Günter Klöppel
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-10-16

6.  Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors with a Morphologically Apparent High-Grade Component: A Pathway Distinct from Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas.

Authors:  Laura H Tang; Brian R Untch; Diane L Reidy; Eileen O'Reilly; Deepti Dhall; Lily Jih; Olca Basturk; Peter J Allen; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Effect of tumor heterogeneity on the assessment of Ki67 labeling index in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver: implications for prognostic stratification.

Authors:  Zhaohai Yang; Laura H Tang; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Variability of Ki67 labeling index in multiple neuroendocrine tumors specimens over the course of the disease.

Authors:  S Singh; J Hallet; C Rowsell; C H L Law
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Patterns of morphologic alteration in residual rectal carcinoma following preoperative chemoradiation and their association with long-term outcome.

Authors:  Jinru Shia; Jose G Guillem; Harvey G Moore; Satish K Tickoo; Jing Qin; Leyo Ruo; Arief Suriawinata; Philip B Paty; Bruce D Minsky; Martin R Weiser; Larissa K Temple; W Douglas Wong; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal.

Authors:  Guido Rindi; David S Klimstra; Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani; Sylvia L Asa; Frederik T Bosman; Elisabeth Brambilla; Klaus J Busam; Ronald R de Krijger; Manfred Dietel; Adel K El-Naggar; Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta; Günter Klöppel; W Glenn McCluggage; Holger Moch; Hiroko Ohgaki; Emad A Rakha; Nicholas S Reed; Brian A Rous; Hironobu Sasano; Aldo Scarpa; Jean-Yves Scoazec; William D Travis; Giovanni Tallini; Jacqueline Trouillas; J Han van Krieken; Ian A Cree
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 7.842

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  An Update on the Management of Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasms (MiNEN).

Authors:  Aasems Jacob; Rishi Raj; Derek B Allison; Heloisa P Soares; Aman Chauhan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-03-26

Review 2.  An update on the development of concepts, diagnostic criteria, and challenging issues for neuroendocrine neoplasms across different digestive organs.

Authors:  Anne Couvelard; Jérôme Cros
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Poor outcome after systemic therapy in secondary high-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Kazhan Mollazadegan; Britt Skogseid; Johan Botling; Tobias Åkerström; Barbro Eriksson; Staffan Welin; Anders Sundin; Joakim Crona
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.335

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.