| Literature DB >> 33176879 |
Chun-Yan Wei1, Xiao-Mei Wang2, Zhen-Sheng Wang1, Zhi-Hua Wang1,3, Zeng-Zhi Guan2, Lian-Hui Zhang1, Xiang-Feng Dou4, Heng Wang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Babesiosis is an emerging tick-borne zoonotic infectious disease. Babesia microti is responsible for most cases of human babesiosis globally. It is important to investigate the prevalence of B. microti in the mammalian host population of a specific region in order to elucidate mechanisms of pathogen transmission and to define geographic areas where humans face the greatest risk of exposure. The aim of this study is to understand the prevalence and genotypes of B. microti in the small mammals that are found in Beijing, China.Entities:
Keywords: Babesia microti; Beijing; Genotype; Molecular epidemiology; Risk factor; Small mammal; Tick-borne infectious disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33176879 PMCID: PMC7661193 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-020-00775-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 4.520
Fig. 1Map of Babesia microti prevalence in small mammals in Beijing. As is shown, B. microti is highly prevalent in small mammals in Beijing, with positive B. microti infection samples from 15 out of the 16 districts. The geographic location for each trapping locality is labeled with white or gray dots for easy recognition in the map. The prevalence of B. microti infection in each district is represented by different colors as illustrated in the legend at the lower right corner of the figure
Prevalence of Babesia microti in small mammals from different districts
| Districts | Regional type | No. of mammals tested | No. of positive | Positive rate (%) | Odd ratio | No. of Kobe-type (%) | No. of U.S.-type (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miyun | Outer suburban | 93 | 34* | 36.6 | 56.47 | 31 (33.3) | 4 (5.4) |
| Huairou | Outer suburban | 83 | 18 | 21.7 | 27.14 | 17 (20.5) | 1 (1.2) |
| Mentougou | Suburban | 80 | 16 | 20.0 | 24.50 | 14 (17.5) | 2 (2.5) |
| Shijingshan | Suburban | 67 | 13 | 19.4 | 23.59 | 13 (19.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Haidian | Suburban | 67 | 11 | 16.4 | 19.25 | 8 (11.9) | 3 (4.5) |
| Fangshan | Suburban | 105 | 15 | 14.3 | 16.33 | 14 (13.3) | 1 (1.0) |
| Tongzhou | Suburban | 78 | 11 | 14.1 | 16.09 | 10 (12.8) | 1 (1.3) |
| Fengtai | Suburban | 59 | 6 | 10.2 | 11.09 | 2 (3.4) | 4 (6.8) |
| Yanqing | Outer suburban | 120 | 12 | 10.0 | 10.89 | 5 (4.2) | 7 (5.8) |
| Dongcheng | Urban | 105 | 10 | 9.5 | 10.32 | 3 (2.9) | 7 (6.7) |
| Pinggu | Outer suburban | 121 | 8 | 6.6 | 6.94 | 6 (5.0) | 2 (1.7) |
| Changping | Suburban | 141 | 9 | 6.4 | 6.68 | 6 (4.3) | 3 (2.1) |
| Xicheng | Urban | 66 | 3 | 4.6 | 4.67 | 2 (3.0) | 1 (1.5) |
| Daxing | Suburban | 59 | 1 | 1.7 | 1.69 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.7) |
| Shunyi | Suburban | 99 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.00 | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Chaoyang | Suburban | 48 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Total | 1391 | 168 | 12.1 | 132 (9.5) | 37 (2.7) |
*Among the 34 samples of Miyun, there was one sample infected by both Kobe-type and U.S.-type B. microti
Prevalence of Babesia microti in small mammals of different species
| Order | Families | Subfamily | Genus | Species | No. of tested | No. of positive | Positive rate (%) | No. of Kobe- type (%) | No. of U.S.- type (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rodentia | Cricetidae | Cricetinaeh | 12 | 4 | 33.3 | 3 (25.0) | 1 (8.3) | ||
| Arvicolinae | 4 | 1 | 25.0 | 1 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| Muridae | Murinae | 188 | 58* | 30.9 | 51 (27.1) | 8 (4.3) | |||
| 120 | 19 | 15.8 | 14 (11.7) | 5 (4.2) | |||||
| 82 | 11 | 13.4 | 10 (12.2) | 1 (1.2) | |||||
| 197 | 22 | 11.2 | 13 (6.6) | 9 (4.6) | |||||
| 776 | 52 | 6.7 | 39 (5.0) | 13 (1.7) | |||||
| Sciuridae | Xerinae | 7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |||
| Insectivora | Soricidae | Soricinae | 5 | 1 | 20.0 | 1 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) |
*Among the 58 positive rodents of Niviventer confucianus, there was one infected by both Kobe-type and U.S.-type B. microti
Fig. 2Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on the comparison of Babesia microti 18S rRNA gene sequences obtained in this study with B. microti reference strains. Babesia duncani WA1, Babesia crassa-like pathogen (Babesia sp. strain H110), Babesia venatorum, Babesia divergens and Babesia sp. XXB/Hangzhou were used as the outgroup. The number on each branch denotes the percent occurrence in 1 000 bootstrap replicates. Black squares stand for sequences identified in this study. Gray dots indicate human B. microti babesiosis in China. Branch lengths are drawn proportional to the estimated sequence divergence. Phylogenetic tree based on maximum parsimony method was also conducted to examine the effect of the resulting phylogenetic tree (data not shown)
Fig. 3Prevalence of both Kobe-type and U.S.-type Babesia microti from different districts (a) and in different reservoir hosts (b). The y axis represents the positive infection rate of B. microti in both (a) and (b), while the x axes in (a) and (b) represent names of different districts and different species of small mammals, respectively. As is shown, Kobe-type B. microti is more prevalent than U.S.-type in nine out of the 15 positive districts (a) and in all of the eight species of small mammalian hosts (b)
Fig. 4Photomicrographs of Giemsa-stained thin smear blood films. As is shown, classic diverse forms of Babesia microti parasites in rodents’ erythrocytes were observed, including dot form (a), ovoid form (b), ring form (c), pyriform (d), headphone form with two chromatin dots (e), Maltese cross form (also known as tetrad form) (f), and ameboid forms (g). Most of the infected red blood cell had one parasite (a–g), but two parasites in one red blood cell were also observed (h)
Univariate analyses of risk factors related to Babesia microti infection
| Variable | Sample size | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Constituent ratio (%) | Positive rate (%) | ||||
| Year | 2014 | 446 | 32.1 | 10.8 | 1.78 | 0.410 |
| 2017 | 419 | 30.1 | 11.7 | |||
| 2018 | 526 | 37.8 | 13.5 | |||
| Altitude (m) | ≤ 40 | 305 | 21.9 | 5.9 | 16.47 | < 0.001 |
| 40–400 | 903 | 64.9 | 14.5 | |||
| > 400 | 183 | 13.2 | 10.4 | |||
| Gender | Female | 514 | 39.4 | 9.9 | 4.77 | 0.029 |
| Male | 790 | 60.6 | 14.2 | |||
| Age | Adult | 1149 | 82.6 | 13.3 | 8.88 | 0.003 |
| Pubertal | 242 | 17.4 | 6.2 | |||
| Ecological habitat | Residential | 822 | 59.1 | 7.2 | 73.34 | 0.000 |
| Shrub | 135 | 9.7 | 27.4 | |||
| Mixed forest | 143 | 10.3 | 8.40 | |||
| Broad-leaved forest | 191 | 13.7 | 23.00 | |||
| Cropland | 100 | 7.2 | 16.00 | |||
This table shows that significant differences were related to different altitudes, genders, ages, and types of ecological habitat of the small mammals, but not to different sampling years, based on the univariate analyses using Chi-square test
Risk factors related to Babesia microti infection based on multivariate logistic regression
| Variable | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Altitude (m) | ≤ 40 | 1 | |
| 40–400 | 2.293 (1.331–3.951) | 0.003 | |
| > 400 | 1.071 (0.476–2.410) | 0.868 | |
| Gender | Female | 1 | |
| Male | 1.370 (0.949–1.978) | 0.092 | |
| Age | Pubertal | 1 | |
| Adult | 1.976 (1.114–3.504) | 0.020 | |
| Ecological habitat | Residential | 1 | |
| Shrub | 4.505 (2.715–7.476) | < 0.001 | |
| Mixed forest | 1.079 (0.508–2.291) | 0.844 | |
| Broad-leaved forest | 3.406 (2.057–5.638) | < 0.001 | |
| cropland | 2.122 (1.146–3.927) | 0.017 | |
This table shows that the altitude of 40–400 m, adult life stage, and ecological habitats of shrub areas, broad-leaved forest, and cropland were risk factors associated with the B. microti infection based on the multivariate logistic regression
OR odd ratio, CI confidence interval