| Literature DB >> 33176679 |
Kayla K Pennerman1, Guohua Yin2, Anthony E Glenn3, Joan W Bennett2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Members of the genus Aspergillus display a variety of lifestyles, ranging from saprobic to pathogenic on plants and/or animals. Increased genome sequencing of economically important members of the genus permits effective use of "-omics" comparisons between closely related species and strains to identify candidate genes that may contribute to phenotypes of interest, especially relating to pathogenicity. Protein-coding genes were predicted from 216 genomes of 12 Aspergillus species, and the frequencies of various structural aspects (exon count and length, intron count and length, GC content, and codon usage) and functional annotations (InterPro, Gene Ontology, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes terms) were compared.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus; Comparative gene annotation; Comparative protein annotation; Hexokinase; Pathogenicity factors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33176679 PMCID: PMC7661267 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-02031-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1IPR functional annotation cluster by Aspergillus species. Non-phytopathogenic strains trend to the left of the plot. Other PCA plots and the corresponding scree plots are shown in Additional file 6
Fig. 2Relative frequencies of IPR terms associated with pathogenicity and/or virulence. Only annotations with significantly different relative frequencies between phytopathogenic and non-phytopathogenic species, and with IPR annotations shared with PHI-base genes are shown. Z-scores were calculated using percentages of total annotations for a strain. Two lines track the mean Z-scores for A. flavus and A. fumigatus. Similar graphs for GO and KEGG annotations are shown in Additional file 8. Annotation terms and definitions are listed in the same order as the x-axes in Additional file 9
Fig. 3Enrichment of GO and KEGG annotation terms. Enrichment of GO biological process terms for a. A. flavus and b. A. fumigatus, and c. KEGG pathways for both species on the KEGG Mapper map for A. flavus metabolic pathways. Enrichment was based on sub-proteomic annotations compared to annotations of the full predicted proteomes. Enriched GO terms are in yellow-shaded boxes. Enriched KEGG pathways are highlighted in the indicated colors. The original diagram of A. flavus KEGG metabolic pathways is shown in Additional file 11
Fig. 4Gene expression during co-culture with human immune cells. Expression of A. fumigatus (Af) amino-sugar processing genes during co-culture with dendritic cells (DC) for 4 h or macrophages (MC) for 0, 1 or 2 h. RNA transcripts were quantified as transcript per million reads (TPM) values for the 17 A. fumigatus Af293 genes of interest. Error bars represent one standard deviation above the mean. Facets are labeled by the NCBI SRA Project accession. The gene encoding XP_749720.1, a hexokinase, was significantly up-regulated during co-culture with dendritic cells