| Literature DB >> 33173746 |
Nan Lyu1, Zeyu Du1, Hua Qiu1, Peng Gao1, Qin Yao2, Kaiqin Xiong1, Qiufen Tu1, Xiangyang Li1, Binghai Chen2, Miao Wang3, Guoqing Pan3, Nan Huang1, Zhilu Yang1.
Abstract
Endothelium can secrete vasoactive mediators and produce specific extracellular matrix, which contribute jointly to tEntities:
Keywords: cardiovascular stents; endothelium mimicking coatings; glycocalyx component; nitric oxide; surface bioengineering
Year: 2020 PMID: 33173746 PMCID: PMC7610264 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202002330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Endothelium‐mimic dual‐functional coating on vascular is achieved by layer‐by‐layer grafting NO‐generating species and the glycoside component hyaluronan. The anticoagulant hyaluronan surface and NO release can synergistically inhibit platelet activation and smooth muscle proliferation on the vascular stent, leading to the improved properties for prevention of thrombosis and restenosis.
Figure 2A) GATR‐FTIR spectra, B) XPS wide‐scan survey, and C) the corresponding elemental compositions on the surfaces of PPAm, DOTA‐Cu, PAa/DOTA‐Cu, and HA@DOTA‐Cu. D,E) Real‐time QCM‐D analysis on the grafting process of DOTA‐C2+(D), PAa (E) and HA (F). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4).
Figure 3A–C) Real‐time NO flux from DOTA‐Cu, PAa/DOTA‐Cu, HA@DOTA‐Cu after immersion in PBS supplemented with NO donor (10 µm GSNO and 10 µm GSH). D) Time‐dependent NO flux of HA@DOTA‐Cu. E,F) NO flux of HA@DOTA‐Cu after preimmersion in cell culture medium and blood for 1 day.
Figure 4A,E) Fluorescence and B,F) SEM images of platelet adhesion on 316L SS surface, PPAm, DOTA‐Cu, PAa/DOTA‐Cu, and HA@DOTA‐Cu surfaces with or without NO donor (10 µm GSNO and 10 µm GSH). The amount of C,G) adherent platelets and D,H) activated platelets were obtained by counting and the GMP‐140 assay. Data presented as mean ± SD and analyzed using a one‐way ANOVA, ::p < 0.01, :::p < 0.001.
Figure 5A) The ex vivo circulation thrombogenicity model of rabbit. B) Cross‐sectional photographs of tubing containing different foils exposed to blood flow supplemented with NO donor for 2 h in a rapid AV shunt model without external heparin. C) Photographs of thrombus on the foils. D) SEM images of the adhered platelets and fibrinogen. Quantitative results of E) occlusion rates, F) the thrombus weights, and G) blood flows in different groups. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 4) and analyzed using a one‐way ANOVA, :p < 0.05, ::p < 0.01, :::p < 0.001.
Figure 6A) Fluorescence staining of human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells (HUASMCs) on different surfaces after culture for 2, 24 and 72 h with NO donor supplement (10 µm GSNO and 10 µm GSH). B) The proliferation of HUASMCs with NO donor for 72 h. C,D) Migration of HUASMCs on different surfaces after 1 day of culture with donor supplement. Arrows show the distance of cell migration. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 4) and analyzed using one‐way ANOVA, :p < 0.05, ::p < 0.01, :::p < 0.001.
Figure 7A) Fluorescence staining of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) on different surfaces after culture for 2, 24 and 72 h with NO donor (10 µm GSNO and 10 µm GSH). B) The proliferation of HUVECs in culture media with donor for 24 and 72 h. C,D) Migration of HUASMCs on different surfaces after 1 day of culture with donor supplement. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 4) and analyzed using one‐way ANOVA, :p < 0.05, ::p < 0.01, :::p < 0.001.
Figure 8A) Green chloromethyl fluorescein diacetate (CMFDA) labeled HUVECs (green) and orange chloromethyl trimethyl rhodamine (CMTMR) labeled HUASMCs (orange) after 2 and 24 h coculture on the sample surfaces. B,C) The average ratios of adhered HUVECs and HUASMCs after 2 (B) and 24 h (C) of cell culture (n = 6). Data presented as mean ± SD and analyzed using a one‐way ANOVA, :p < 0.05, ::p < 0.01, :::p < 0.001.
Figure 9Long‐term stent implantation in vivo. A–C) Re‐endothelialization on the control and dual‐functional stents after implantation for 1, 4 and 12 weeks. D–F) Histomorphometric and quantitative analysis of ISR prevention in vivo. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of stent implantation experiments and analyzed using one‐way ANOVA, :p < 0.05, ::p < 0.01, :::p < 0.001.