| Literature DB >> 33173066 |
Simon Bannison Bani1, Kwabena Owusu Danquah2, Christian Obirikorang3, William K B A Owiredu4, Lawrence Quaye1, Edmund Muonir Der5, Emmanuel Acheampong4,6, Yussif Adams1, Peter Paul M Dapare1, Moses Banyeh1, Enoch Odame Anto2,6, Samuel Asamoah Sakyi4.
Abstract
Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is known to cause lipid abnormalities such as dyslipidaemia in HIV-infected individuals. Yet, dyslipidaemia may not independently occur as it may be worsened by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL). This case-control study was conducted in three-selected hospitals in the Northern part of Ghana. The study constituted a total of 118 HIV-infected participants aged 19-71 years, who had been on HAART for 6-24 months. Dyslipidaemia was defined based on the NCEP-ATP III criteria. HIV-infected individuals on HAART with dyslipidaemia were classified as cases while those without dyslipidaemia were grouped as controls. Lipid profile was measured using an automatic clinical chemistry analyzer and genomic DNA was extracted for PCR (GeneAmp PCR System 2700). Overall, the prevalence of dyslipidaemia was 39.0% (46/118). High levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), and reduced levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were observed in all cases. A total of 256 selected PCR amplicons comprising 137 LPL (exons 3, 5 and 6) and 119 LCAT (exons 1, 4, and 6) were sequenced in 46 samples (Inqaba Biotech). Six (6) clinically significant SNPs were identified in exons 1 and 4 for LCAT whereas 25 non-clinically significant SNPs were identified for LPL in exons 5 and 6. At position 97 for LCAT exon 1, there was a deletion of the nucleotide, 'A' in 32.5% (13/40) of the sampled population while 67.5% (27/40) of the sample population retained the nucleotide, 'A' which was significantly associated with dyslipidaemic outcomes in the study population (p = 0.0004). A total of 25 SNPs were identified in exons 5 and 6 of LPL; 22 were substitutions, and 3 were insertions. However, none of the 25 SNPs identified in LPL exon 5 and 6 were statistically significant. SNPs in LCAT may independently contribute to dyslipidaemia among Ghanaian HIV-infected individuals on HAART, thus, allowing genetic and/or functional differential diagnosis of dyslipidaemia and creating an opportunity for potentially preventive options.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33173066 PMCID: PMC7655843 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76113-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flowchart of study participants. TCH Tamale Central Hospital, TTH Tamale Teaching Hospital, TWH Tamale West Hospital.
Primer information.
| Primer name | Primer sequence | Amplicon size | TM (℃) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCAT exon 1 | FP: 5′-GCTTTCTCTGGCAGTAGGCA-3′ RP: 5′-TGGTGGGGGCTTACCGAG-3′ | 164 | 60.04 61.01 |
| LCAT exon 4 | FP: 5′-GTGCTGCTGGTCCCCC-3′ RP: 5′-TCATCCGCAGAGACACTCA-3′ | 95 | 59.61 58.04 |
| LCAT exon 6 | FP: 5′-TGTCCCACCTTGCTCCATATC-3′ RP: 5′-TCAACCTGAAACATAGCCATCA-3′ | 594 | 59.51 57.70 |
| LPL exon 3 | FP: 5′-AAAGCTTGTGTCATCATCTTCAGG-3′ RP: 5′-CACATAAGTCTCCTTCTCCCAGT-3′ | 180 | 59.54 59.23 |
| LPL exon 5 | FP: 5′-AATTTACAAATCTGTGTTCCTGCT-3′ RP: 5′-AGGATAAGAGTCACATTTAATTCGC-3′ | 234 | 57.34 57.52 |
| LPL exon 6 | FP: 5′-TGCCGAGATACAATCTTGGTGT-3′ RP: 5′-CCTTATTTACAACAGTCTCCAGCC-3′ | 243 | 59.76 59.36 |
The designed primers were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IOWA, United States (https://eu.idtdna.com/site, integrated DNA Technologies Inc, USA).
LCAT lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase, LPL lipoprotein lipase, FP forward primer, RP reverse primer, TM melting temperature.
Figure 2Results of ethidium bromide-stained full-length agarose gel electrophoresis visualized with UV light.
General characteristics of study participants.
| Variable | Cases (n = 46) | Controls (n = 72) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 42.3 (39.1–45.4) | 37.5 (35.4–39.7) | 0.0107 |
| 0.9870 | |||
| Male | 7 (15.2) | 12 (16.7) | |
| Female | 39 (84.8) | 60 (83.7) | |
| Duration of HAART (months) | 15.6 (13.5–17.6) | 15.7 (14.1–17.2) | 0.9093 |
| AZT/3TC/EFV | 1 (2.2) | 1 (1.4) | 0.9989 |
| AZT/3TC/NVP | 7 (15.2) | 6 (8.3) | 0.3662 |
| TDF/3TC/EFV | 34 (73.9) | 59 (82.0) | 0.3577 |
| TDF/3TC/NVP | 4 (8.7) | 6 (8.3) | 0.9989 |
| Systolic blood pressure | 110.9 (106.5–115.2) | 110.6 (107.2–114.1) | 0.9353 |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 82.1 (79.4–84.9) | 78.6 (76.8–80.4) | 0.0300 |
| Weight (kg) | 65.5 (61.6–69.4) | 60.0 (53.5–70.0) | 0.0071 |
| Total cholesterol | 5.6 (5.3–5.8) | 3.9 (3.6–4.2) | < 0.0001 |
| Triglycerides | 1.5 (1.3–1.8) | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) | 0.0439 |
| HDL-cholesterol | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) | 1.5 (1.4–1.6) | < 0.0001 |
| LDL-cholesterol | 4.2 (4.0–4.4) | 2.7 (2.5–2.9) | < 0.0001 |
| VLDL-cholesterol | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) | 0.6 (0.5–0.7) | 0.0449 |
| Coronary risk | 14.9 (11.8–17.9) | 12.7 (10.2–15.2) | 0.2782 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol | 4.9 (4.7–5.1) | 3.2 (3.0–3.4) | < 0.0001 |
| High triglycerides, n (%)a | 13 (28.3) | 16 (22.2) | 0.5138 |
| High total cholesterol, n (%)a | 46 (100.0) | 10 (13.9) | < 0.0001 |
| Low HDL-cholesterol, n (%)a | 46 (100.0) | 62 (86.1) | < 0.0001 |
| High LDL-cholesterol, n (%)a | 46 (100.0) | 16 (22.2) | < 0.0001 |
Cases: HIV-infected patients with dyslipidemia, control: HIV-infected without dyslipidaemia, Data is presented mean (95% CI).
aFisher exact test, Dyslipidaemia was defined as the presence of having at least two lipid abnormalities based on the NCEP-ATP III criteria. Zidovudine (AZT), Lamivudine (3TC), efavirenz (EFV), Nevirapine (NVP), Tenofovir (TDF), Lopinavir (LPV), NVP, Emtricitabine (FTC) and Ritonavir (r). Dyslipidaemic indices are presented as frequency (percentage).
Figure 3Distribution of the duration of HAART. Data are presented in frequency (n).
Types of nucleotide changes identified in LCAT, and their associations with dyslipidemia in the study population.
| Mutation ∆ | Exon | Position | Ref Seq (frequency) | SNP Seq (frequency) | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substitution | 1 | 86 | C (33/40, 87.5%) | A (7/40, 12.5%) | 8.143 (0.898–97.551) | 0.091 |
| Substitution | 89 | G (35/40, 87.5%) | A (5/40, 12.5%) | 0.211 (0.021–2.079) | 0.341 | |
| Deletion | 97 | A (27/40, 67.5%) | del (13/40, 32.5%) | 28.500 (3.155–57.400) | 0.0004 | |
| Substitution | 4 | 111 | C (37/40, 92.5%) | A (3/40, 7.5%) | 8.200 (0.396–16.990) | 0.231 |
| Substitution | 121 | C (35/40, 87.5%) | A (5/40, 12.5%) | 4.750 (0.481–46.910) | 0.341 | |
| Deletion | 8 | A (4/46, 8.7%) | del (42/46, 91.3%) | 0.500 (0.041–6.086) | 0.999 |
Odds ratio for dyslipidaemia risk of the SNPs identified in LCAT exon 1 and 4. REF reference, SEQ sequence, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, del deletion, ∆ change, Data are presented as discrete, fractions and percentages. P-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Reference population were defined as individuals with ‘normal’ nucleotide sequenced whereas SNP population were those with nucleotide changes.
Types of nucleotide changes identified in LPL, and their associations with dyslipidaemia in the study population.
| Mutation ∆ | Exon | Position | Ref seq frequency | SNP seq frequency | OR (95% CI) | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insertion | 5 | 8 | (39/46, 84.8%) | C (3/46, 6.5%) | 3.86 (0.17–87.20) | 0.502 |
| T (4/46, 8.7%) | 5.40 (0.26–11.37) | 0.261 | ||||
| 27, 28, 29 | (42/46, 91.3%) | TAC (4/46, 8.7%) | 4.85 (0.23–10.17) | 0.279 | ||
| Substitution | 6 | 1, 2, 3 | GCC (42/46, 91.3%) | TTA (4/46, 8.7%) | 4.85 (0.23–10.17) | 0.279 |
| 5, 6 | CG (42/46, 91.3%) | AA (4/46, 8.7%) | 4.85 (0.23–10.17) | 0.279 | ||
| 9,10,11,12 | GTCG (43/46, 94.3%) | CATG (3/46, 6.5%) | 3.29 (0.15–74.06) | 0.519 | ||
| 14 | C (42/46, 91.4%) | T (4/46, 8.7%) | 4.85 (0.23–10.17) | 0.279 | ||
| 15 | T (43/46, 94.3%) | C (3/46, 6.5%) | 3.29 (0.15–74.06) | 0.519 | ||
| 17 | T (39/46, 85.8%) | G (3/46, 6.5%) | 3.86 (0.17–87.20) | 0.502 | ||
| C (4/46, 8.7%) | 5.40 (0.26–113.7) | 0.26 | ||||
| 20 | C (39/46, 85.8%) | A (3/46, 6.5%) | 3.86 (0.17–87.20) | 0.502 | ||
| G (4/46, 8.5%) | 5.40 (0.26–113.7) | 0.260 | ||||
| 21 | C (43/46, 94.3%) | A (3/46, 6.5%) | 3.29 (0.14–74.06) | 0.519 | ||
| 23 | G (42/46, 91.5%) | A (4/46, 8.7%) | 4.85 (0.23–101.7) | 0.279 | ||
| 33 | C (42/46, 91.5%) | T (4/46, 8.7%) | 4.85 (0.23–101.7) | 0.279 | ||
| 39 | T (43/46, 94.3%) | G (3/46, 6.5%) | 3.29 (0.15–74.11) | 0.519 | ||
| 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 | GTAGA (40/46, 87.0%) | GTATG (3/46, 6.5%) | 0.11 (0.005–2.55) | 0.148 | ||
| ACCCG (3/46, 6.5%) | 0.11 (0.005–2.55) | 0.148 | ||||
| 47, 48, 49 | GTC (40/46, 87.0%) | TAA (3/46, 6.5%) | 2.56 (0.11–58.40) | 0.990 | ||
| GAC (3/46, 6.5%) | 0.10 (0.004–2.34) | 0.133 | ||||
| 16 | T (40/43, 93.0%) | G (3/43, 7.0%) | 0.103 (0.005–2.14) | 0.089 | ||
| 80 | A (41/43, 95.3%) | T (2/43, 4.7%) | 5.00 (0.22–11.50) | 0.489 | ||
| 86 | C (35/43, 81.6%) | T (8/43, 18.6%) | 1.18 (0.23–6.13) | 0.990 | ||
| 96 | T (39/43, 90.7%) | A (4/43, 9.3%) | 9.51 (0.47–19.01 | 0.110 | ||
| 190 | C (41/43, 95.3%) | T (2/43, 5.1%) | 4.74 (0.21–105.6) | 0.489 |
Odds ratio for dyslipidaemia risk of the various SNPs identified in LPL. SEQ sequence, FREQ Frequency, REF Reference, ∆ change, OR Odds ratio, LPL lipoprotein lipase. Data are presented as discrete, fractions and percentages. P-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Reference population were defined as individuals with ‘normal’ nucleotide sequenced Whereas SNP population were those with nucleotide changes. SNPs identified in LCAT and their contributions to dyslipidaemia in the study population.
Comparison of lipid profile results amongst reference sequence and SNP populations.
| Nucleotide ∆ | Exon | POS | Reference population | SNPs population | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEQ FREQ | CHOL | TRIG | SEQ FREQ | CHOL | TRIG | |||
| Substitution | 1 | 86 | C*(35/40, 87.5%) | 6.483 ± 1.512 | 1.337 ± 0.873 | A (5/40, 12.5%) | 4.538 ± 1.241 | 1.966 ± 1.609 |
| 89 | G* (35/40, 87.5%) | 4.982 ± 1.521 | 0.570 ± 0.255 | A (5/40, 12.5%) | 4.156 ± 0.887 | 1.572 ± 1.051 | ||
| 97 | A*(27/40, 67.5%) | 4.208 ± 1.119 | 1.339 ± 0.952 | 6.272 ± 1.114† | 1.671 ± 1.213 | |||
| 111 | C*(37/40, 92.5%) | 4.684 ± 1.344 | 1.328 ± 0.838 | A (3/40, 7.5%) | 7.283 ± 0.719 | 2.917 ± 2.228 | ||
| 121 | C*(35/40, 87.5%) | 4.688 ± 1.368 | 1.337 ± 0.850 | A (5/40, 12.5%) | 6.214 ± 1.660†† | 2.220 ± 1.886 | ||
| Deletion | 4 | 8 | A*(4/46, 8.7%) | 6.177 ± 2.154 | 0.727 ± 0.273 | 4.842 ± 1.484 | 1.564 ± 1.005 | |
Unpaired t-test comparison of lipid profile parameters. †Denotes a significant comparison between reference population and SNP population when P-value is < 0.05, ++-† ††Denotes a significant comparison between reference population and SNP population when P-value is < 0.001. SEQ sequence, LDL low density lipoprotein, HDL high density lipoprotein, TRIG triglycerides, VLDL very low-density lipoprotein, CR coronary risk. FREQ frequency, ∆ change, LCAT lecithin cholesteryl acyl transferase, Data are presented as means ± SD, discrete, fractions and percentages. Reference population were defined as individuals with ‘normal’ nucleotide sequenced Whereas SNP population were those with nucleotide changes.