Literature DB >> 17343715

Localization of temporal preparation effects via trisected reaction time.

Steven A Hackley1, Andrea Schankin, Andreas Wohlschlaeger, Edmund Wascher.   

Abstract

Previous research using nonchronometric measures in humans and animals has shown that warning signals can influence stages of processing throughout the reaction time (RT) interval. However, latency measures indicate that warning effects on RT are not due to the speeding of motor processes, at least not late ones. To better isolate the chronometric effects of temporal preparation, we used lateralized event-related potentials to divide mean RT into three time segments. Foreperiod duration had only a small, nonsignificant influence on the first and last segments (early visual and late motor processes, respectively). The chronometric effect was mainly restricted to the middle interval, which extended from onset of the N2pc component to onset of the lateralized readiness potential. The results imply that temporal preparation primarily speeds late perception, response selection or early motor processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17343715     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00500.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  7 in total

1.  Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of evidence from a dual-process perspective.

Authors:  Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Auditory facilitation of visual-target detection persists regardless of retinal eccentricity and despite wide audiovisual misalignments.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.

Authors:  Ruud L van den Brink; Peter R Murphy; Kobe Desender; Nicole de Ru; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The diachronic account of attentional selectivity.

Authors:  Alon Zivony; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  Not All Predictions Are Equal: "What" and "When" Predictions Modulate Activity in Auditory Cortex through Different Mechanisms.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Thomas Thesen; Werner Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Anna C Nobre; Charles E Schroeder; Karl J Friston; Lucia Melloni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Behavioral and Brain Measures of Phasic Alerting Effects on Visual Attention.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Anders Petersen; Kathrin Finke; Claus Bundesen; Jon Lansner; Thomas Habekost
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Temporal dynamics of selective attention and conflict resolution during cross-dimensional Go-NoGo decisions.

Authors:  Bruno Kopp; Sandra Tabeling; Carsten Moschner; Karl Wessel
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.288

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.