| Literature DB >> 33172106 |
Sergio Claudio Saccà1, Alberto Izzotti2, Stefania Vernazza3, Sara Tirendi2,4, Sonia Scarfì4,5, Stefano Gandolfi6, Anna Maria Bassi2,4.
Abstract
Polyphenols, with anti-oxidant properties, counteract oxidative stress effects. Increasing evidence has found oxidative stressto be the main risk factor for trabecular meshwork (TM) damage, leading to high-tension glaucoma. Topical anti-oxidants could represent a new target for glaucoma treatment. Our aim is to investigate the protective mechanisms on a human TM culture of a patented polyphenol and fatty acid (iTRAB®)formulation in response to oxidative stress using an advanced invitromodel consisting of 3D-human TM cells, embedded in a natural hydrogel, and a milli-scaled multi-organ device model for constantdynamic conditions. The 3D-human TM cells(3D-HTMCs) were treated daily with 500 µM H2O2or 500 µM H2O2and 0.15% iTRAB®(m/v) for 72 h, and molecular differences in the intracellular reactive oxygen species (iROS), state of the cells, activation of the apoptosis pathway and NF-kB and the expression ofinflammatory and fibrotic markers wereanalyzed at different time-points.Concomitant exposure significantly reduced iROS and restored TM viability, iTRAB® having a significant inhibitory effect on the apoptotic pathway, activation of NF-κB, induction of pro-inflammatory (IL-1α, IL-1ß and TNFα) and pro-fibrotic (TGFβ) cytokines and the matrix metalloproteinase expressions. It is clear that this specific anti-oxidant provides a valid TM protection, suggesting iTRAB® could be an adjuvant therapy in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Entities:
Keywords: 3D-advanced culture model; dynamic culture conditions; glaucoma; iTRAB®; milli-fluidic technology; oxidative stress; polyphenols; trabecular meshwork
Year: 2020 PMID: 33172106 PMCID: PMC7694784 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113584
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Primer sequences used for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis.
| Gene | GenBank | F | R |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL1α | NM_000575.4 | CAATCTgTgTCTCTgAgTATC | TCAACCgTCTCTTCTTCA |
| IL1β | NM_000576.2 | TgATggCTTATTACAgTggCAATg | gTAgTggTggTCggAgATTCg |
| IL6 | NM_001318095.1 | CAgATTTgAgAgTAgTgAggAAC | CgCAgAATgAgATgAgTTgTC |
| TNFα | NM_000594.4 | GTGAGGAGGACGAACATC | GAGCCAGAAGAGGTTGAG |
| TGFβ2 | NM_001135599.3 | AACCTCTAACCATTCTCTACTACA | CgTCgTCATCATCATTATCATCA |
| SPARC | NM_003118.4 | ATggTTCCTgTAAgCACTAA | TgAATgAATgAATgAATgAATgAC |
| MMP1 | NM_001145938.1 | ggTgATgAAgCAgCCCAgATg | CAgAggTgTgACATTACTCCAgAg |
| MMP3 | NM_002422.5 | TAATAATTCTTCACCTAAgTCTCT | AgATTCACgCTCAAgTTC |
| HPRT-1 | NM_000194.3 | GGTCAGGCAGTATAATCCAAAG | TTCATTATAGTCAAGGGCATATCC |
The mini map of the Human Apoptosis Array C1 (according to RayBio® manufacturer’s manual).
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POS | POS | NEG | NEG | Blank | Blank | bad | bax | Bcl2 | Bcl2-w | BID | BIM | Caspase3 | Caspase8 |
| 2 | ||||||||||||||
| 3 | CD40 | CD40L | cIAP2 | CytoC | DR6 | Fas | FasL | Blank | Hsp27 | Hsp60 | Hsp70 | HTRA2 | IGF1 | IGF2 |
| 4 | ||||||||||||||
| 5 | IGFBP1 | IGFBP2 | IGFBP3 | IGFBP4 | IGFBP5 | IGFBP6 | IGF-1R | Livin | P21 | P27 | P53 | SMAC | Survivn | TNF RI |
| 6 | ||||||||||||||
| 7 | TNF RII | TNFα | TNFβ | TRAIL R1 | TRAIL R2 | TRAIL R3 | TRAIL R4 | XIAP | Blank | Blank | NEG | NEG | POS | POS |
| 8 |
Figure 1Reactive oxygen species (ROS) Production and Viability. (A) ROS production. Dichlorofluorescein (DCF) assays were performed after 2 h of experimental procedures. (B) Viability index. Viability indices were performed by Alamar blue assay. Data areexpressed as % vs. untreated (U.T) 3D-human trabecular meshwork cells (3D-HTMCs) and represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3 independent experiments. ***,** treated 3D HTMCs vs. UT; @ H2O2-treated vs. H2O2+iTRAB-treated 3D HTMC. ***/@ p < 0.001;** p < 0.01 (Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test).
Figure 2Apoptosis Array.Analysis of pro- and anti- apoptotic protein levels (A,B, respectively) in 3D-HTMCs, cultured under dynamic conditions, were performed both after the 2nd exposure of only 500 µM H2O2and co-treatment with iTRAB® and 500 µM H2O2,by Human Antibody Array C1 (RayBio® C-series). The black dotted line represents the protein level of untreated (U.T.) 3D human trabecular meshwork cells (HTMCs) for each protein examined. The anti-apoptotic pattern represents only the data related to those proteins that showed significant different levels compared to U.T. and H2O2-treated. Three separate conditions were arrayed and for each experiment, the intensity of Positive Control Spot was used to normalize signal responses for a comparison of results across multiple arrays. a, b, c, treated 3D HTMCs vs. UT; @, + H2O2-treated vs. H2O2+iTRAB-treated 3D HTMC. a/+ p < 0.001; b p < 0.01; c/@ p < 0.05 (Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test).
Figure 3Western Blot Analysis. (A) The figures depicted are representative of at least three similar immunoblot analysis of NF-kB (p65), p-NF-kB (p65) protein levels in untreated 3Dhuman trabecular meshwork cells (HTMCs) and treated 3D HTMCs (H2O2/H2O2+ iTRAB®). GAPDH was used as an internal control for equal protein loading on the gel. (B) NF-kBp65 activation was evaluated in 3D-HTMCs after the 3rd exposure of 500 µM H2O2 only and co-treatment with iTRAB® and 500 µM H2O2. The analysis was performed by immunoblotting and the bars represent the ratio of phosfoNF-kBp65/NF-kBp65, and are expressed as % vs. untreated HTMC cultures. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3 independent experiments. The black dotted line represents the protein level of the untreated HTMC. *** treated 3D HTMCs vs. untreated (U.T.); @H2O2-treated vs. H2O2+iTRAB-treated 3D HTMC. *** p < 0.001; @ p < 0.05 (Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test).
Figure 4qPCR Analysis.Gene expression analysis was performed on 3D-human trabecular meshwork cells (HTMCs)HTMCs after the 2nd and 3rdexposure of 500 µM H2O2 only and co-treatment with iTRAB® and 500 µM H2O2. (A) IL1α, IL1β, IL6, TNFα; (B) TGFβ and SPARC; (C) MMP1 and MMP3. Data are expressed as fold-increases relative to untreated cultures at the same end-point and normalized to HPRT1 housekeeping gene expression. The black dotted line represents the gene level of untreated 3D HTMCs for each gene examined. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. ***, **, * treated 3D HTMCs vs. untreated (U.T.); +, @ H2O2-treated vs. H2O2+iTRAB-treated 3D HTMC. ***/+ p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; */@ p < 0.05 (Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’stest).