| Literature DB >> 33172041 |
Chu-Hung Lin1, Hsiao-Jung Chou2, Chih-Chi Chang2, Ih-Sheng Chen3, Hsun-Shuo Chang3,4, Tian-Lu Cheng4,5, Yueh-Hsiung Kuo6,7,8, Horng-Huey Ko2,4.
Abstract
Neolitsea acuminatissima (Lauraceae) is an endemic plant in Taiwan. One new carboline alkaloid, demethoxydaibucarboline A (1), two new eudesmanolide-type sesquiterpenes, methyl-neolitacumone A (2), neolitacumone E (3), and twelve known compounds (4-15) were isolated from the root of Neolitsea acuminatissima. Their structures were elucidated by spectroscopic analysis. Glucuronidation represents a major metabolism process of detoxification for carcinogens in the liver. However, intestinal bacterial β-Glucuronidase (βG) has been considered pivotal to colorectal carcinogenesis. To develop specific bacterial-βG inhibitors with no effect on human βG, methanolic extract of roots of N. acuminatissima was selected to evaluate their anti-βG activity. Among the isolates, demethoxydaibucarboline A (1) and quercetin (8) showed a strong bacterial βG inhibitory effect with an inhibition ratio of about 80%. Methylneolitacumone A (2) and epicatechin (10) exhibited a moderate or weak inhibitory effect and the enzyme activity was less than 45% and 74%, respectively. These four compounds specifically inhibit bacterial βG but not human βG. Thus, they are expected to be used for the purpose of reducing chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID). The results suggest that the constituents of N. acuminatissima have the potential to be used as CID relief candidates. However, further investigation is required to determine their mechanisms of action.Entities:
Keywords: Lauraceae; Neolitsea acuminatissima; carboline; chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID); eudesmanolide; root; β-Glucuronidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33172041 PMCID: PMC7664238 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25215170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of compounds (1–15) isolated from the root of Neolitsea acuminatissima.
1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopic data of compounds 1–3.
| Position | 1 (Acetone- | Position | 2 (CDCl3) | 3 (CDCl3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH ( | δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | δC | ||
| 1 | 146.6 | 1 | 3.36, dd (11.2, 4.0) | 78.8 | 211.3 | ||
| 3 | 8.24, d (5.2) | 139.0 | 2α | 1.80, ddd (13.6, 4.8, 2.0) | 30.8 | 2.73, td (16.1, 7.3) | 37.3 |
| 4 | 7.82, d (5.2) | 114.3 | 2β | 1.57, ddd (13.6, 4.8, 2.0) | 2.47, m | ||
| 5 | 7.56, d (2.4) | 107.2 | 3α | 2.05, td (13.8, 4.8) | 33.6 | 2.67, td (14.6, 5.0) | 34.4 |
| 6 | 152.8 | 3β | 2.31, td (13.8, 4.8) | 2.47, m | |||
| 7 | 7.10, dd (8.8, 2.4) | 119.4 | 4 | 146.6 | 144.6 | ||
| 8 | 7.40, d (8.8) | 113.9 | 5 | 1.88, m | 49.6 | 2.22, dt (13.7, 1.6) | 48.2 |
| 1a | 131.3 | 6α | 2.38, dd (13.0, 3.2) | 24.2 | 2.86, dd (13.7, 3.6) | 25.0 | |
| 4a | 129.7 | 6β | 2.47, t (13.0) | 2.50, td (13.7, 1.2) | |||
| 5a | 123.9 | 7 | 158.8 | 160.3 | |||
| 8a | 136.6 | 8 | 106.2 | 4.80, dd (11.8, 6.3) | 78.2 | ||
| 1′ | 131.6 | 9α | 1.38, d (13.6) | 46.4 | 1.44, dd (13.2, 11.8) | 40.0 | |
| 2′, 6′ | 7.20, d (8.8) | 113.3 | 9β | 2.78, d (13.6) | 2.63, td (13.2, 6.3) | ||
| 3′, 5′ | 6.70, d (8.8) | 116.6 | 10 | 41.1 | 49.4 | ||
| 4′ | 157.3 | 11 | 124.3 | 121.4 | |||
| 7′ | 4.37, s | 40.8 | 12 | 171.7 | 174.5 | ||
| NH | 10.32, br s | 13 | 1.86, d (1.6) | 8.3 | 1.83, t (1.6) | 8.6 | |
| 14 | 0.94, s | 10.3 | 1.17, s | 17.0 | |||
| 15a | 4.64, d (1.6) | 108.1 | 4.92, s | 110.8 | |||
| 15b | 4.90, d (1.6) | 5.16, s | |||||
| OCH3 | 3.16, s | 50.4 | |||||
1H- (400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (100 MHz) data for compounds 1 and 2; 1H- (500 MHz) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz) data for compound 3.
Figure 2Key HMBC (H→C) correlations of 1–3.
Figure 3Anti-E. coli β-Glucuronidase (anti-eβG) activity of isolates of the root of N. acuminatissima. Each column represents the mean ± SD of three experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 indicates significant differences from the no inhibitor group.