| Literature DB >> 33171876 |
Małgorzata Karwowska1, Anna D Kononiuk1, Dariusz M Stasiak1, Krzysztof Patkowski2.
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of fermented milk maceration on fermented lamb loin without nitrate to obtain peptides with high activity against oxidative changes (ABTS, DPPH, reducing power) as well as a favorable fatty acid profile, including CLA content. Additionally, an attempt was made to evaluate the influence of the lamb breed on the assessed properties. Raw loins (m. Longissimus dorsi) obtained from sheep of three polish breeds-Wrzosówka, Uhruska, and Świniarka-and fermented products were tested. The fermented loins obtained after 14 days of processing were characterized by pH and water activity values in the ranges, respectively, 4.76-5.12 and 0.902-0.915. The maceration of meat in a fermented milk has caused greater acidification of the meat during fermentation. Statistical analysis indicated that treatment was the factor with significant effect on peptide content; no effect of animal breed was found. The peptide content isolated from raw meat ranged from 2.90 to 4.31 mg g-1 of sample, while in fermented meat products it was significant higher (11.59-16.37 mg g-1 of product). The antioxidant properties of peptides were positively correlated with peptides content. The maceration in fermented milk resulted in a statistically significant increase of ABTS value in case of fermented lamb loin of Świniarka breed. The raw meat and fermented meat products form the Świniarka lamb breed were characterized by the highest content of the total CLA isomers. The main CLA isomer found was cis9-trans11 (rumenic acid), followed by cis9-cis11, trans9-trans11, and trans10-cis12. The rumenic acid content was higher than, respectively, 87% and 80-88% of total CLA isomers in case of raw meat and fermented lamb loins of three breeds.Entities:
Keywords: CLA; antioxidant properties; fatty acid profile; fermented lamb; peptide
Year: 2020 PMID: 33171876 PMCID: PMC7695192 DOI: 10.3390/antiox9111094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
pH and water activity of lamb raw meat and products (mean ± standard deviation).
| Parameter | Lamb Breeds | Raw Meat | P1 | P2 | P3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aw | W | 0.972 a ± 0.007 | 0.908 bcd ± 0.003 | 0.903 bc ± 0.003 | 0.913 bc ± 0.005 |
| U | 0.974 a ± 0.001 | 0.910 bcd ± 0.002 | 0.902 c ± 0.001 | 0.915 b ± 0.001 | |
| S | 0.972 a ± 0.007 | 0.908 bcd ± 0.002 | 0.905 bc ± 0.002 | 0.907 bcd ± 0.001 | |
| pH | W | 5.58 a ± 0.03 | 5.12 b ± 0.04 | 4.98 c ± 0.01 | 4.82 d ± 0.04 |
| U | 5.59 a ± 0.09 | 5.12 b ± 0.03 | 5.02 bc ± 0.05 | 4.78 d ± 0.01 | |
| S | 5.51 a ± 0.02 | 5.10 b ± 0.02 | 5.05 bc ± 0.02 | 4.76 d ± 0.01 |
Means with different letters (a–d) differ significantly (p < 0.05). P1–P3 types of treatment: P1—treatment with sea salt and sodium nitrate, P2—treatment with sea salt, P3—treatment with sea salt and fermented milk, W, U, S—lamb breeds: W—Wrzosówka, U—Uhruska, S—Świniarka.
Significance levels showed by experimental factors and their interactions for analyzed parameters of lamb raw meat and products.
| Parameter | pH | aw | Peptide Content | Antioxidant Activity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABTS | DPPH | RP | ||||
| Breeds (B) | – | – | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Treatment (T) | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ** |
| B × T | – | – | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Fixed effects: B × T—interaction between breeds and treatment. p-value: *** (p < 0.001), ** (p < 0.01), * (p < 0.05); – (not significant).
Peptide content and antioxidant activity of lamb raw meat and products.
| Parameter | Lamb Breeds | Raw Meat | P1 | P2 | P3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| peptide content | W | 4.31 f ± 0.45 | 11.59 e ± 0.45 | 15.80 abc ± 0.88 | 16.37 a ± 0.73 |
| U | 4.26 f ± 0.56 | 15.56 abc ± 0.45 | 16.06 ab ± 0.95 | 11.84 de ± 0.61 | |
| S | 2.90 g ± 0.03 | 14.08 bc ± 0.21 | 14.41 abc ± 1.22 | 13.88 cd ± 1.19 | |
| ABTS | W | 0.964 d ± 0.095 | 0.796 def± 0.051 | 0.851 de ± 0.044 | 0.891 d ± 0.040 |
| U | 0.614 f ± 0.067 | 1.610 bc ± 0.043 | 1.703 bc ± 0.080 | 1.801 b ± 0.098 | |
| S | 0.637 ef ± 0.085 | 1.645 bc ± 0.022 | 1.536 c ± 0.027 | 2.081 a ± 0.133 | |
| DPPH | W | 0.343 e ± 0.085 | 1.276 bc ± 0.090 | 1.000 d ± 0.008 | 1.164 cd ± 0.104 |
| U | 0.117 f ± 0.050 | 1.196 c ± 0.042 | 1.187 cd ± 0.022 | 1.492 a ± 0.061 | |
| S | 0.064 f ± 0.007 | 1.408 ab ± 0.014 | 1.280 bc ± 0.077 | 1.499 a ± 0.104 | |
| RP | W | 0.024 de ± 0.002 | 0.020 e ± 0.001 | 0.020 e ± 0.000 | 0.020 e ± 0.001 |
| U | 0.024 cde ± 0.001 | 0.028 bcd ± 0.003 | 0.030 bcd ± 0.001 | 0.033 ab ± 0.002 | |
| S | 0.031 abc ± 0.005 | 0.029 bcd ± 0.002 | 0.029 bcd ± 0.002 | 0.037 a ± 0.003 |
Means with different letters (a–g) differ significantly (p < 0.05). P1–P3 types of treatment: P1—treatment with sea salt and sodium nitrate, P2—treatment with sea salt, P3—treatment with sea salt and fermented milk, W, U, S—lamb breeds: W—Wrzosówka, U—Uhruska, S—Świniarka.
Figure 1The correlations (shown as heat map) between research parameters.
Fatty acid composition (%) of raw meat and fermented lamb loin. P1–P3 types of treatment: P1—treatment with sea salt and sodium nitrate, P2—treatment with sea salt, and P3—treatment with sea salt and fermented milk.
| W | U | S | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Meat | P1 | P2 | P3 | Raw Meat | P1 | P2 | P3 | Raw Meat | P1 | P2 | P3 | |
| SFA | 48.52 | 53.45 | 50.52 | 53.45 | 48.95 | 49.72 | 48.24 | 53.41 | 53.44 | 51.70 | 51.37 | 47.64 |
| MUFA | 45.22 | 39.35 | 43.02 | 39.35 | 40.34 | 40.62 | 42.08 | 39.59 | 39.97 | 38.03 | 39.25 | 37.38 |
| PUFA | 6.25 | 7.20 | 6.46 | 7.20 | 10.70 | 9.65 | 9.67 | 7.00 | 6.59 | 10.26 | 9.38 | 14.98 |
| UFA/SFA | 1.06 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 0.87 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.10 |
| MUFA/SFA | 0.93 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.79 |
| PUFA/SFA | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.32 |
| PUFA 6/3 | 8.82 | 8.68 | 8.50 | 8.66 | 5.55 | 4.29 | 4.32 | 5.53 | 2.76 | 3.68 | 2.97 | 3.16 |
SFA—saturated fatty acids; MUFA—monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA—polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Figure 2Fatty acids profile [%] of different treatment of lamb products. P1–P3 types of treatment: P1—treatment with sea salt and sodium nitrate, P2—treatment with sea salt, P3—treatment with sea salt and fermented milk. W, U, S—lamb breeds: W—Wrzosówka, U—Uhruska, S—Świniarka.
Figure 3The contribution of individual CLA isomers to the total quantity of conjugated linoleic acid. W, U, S—lamb breeds: W—Wrzosówka, U—Uhruska, S—Świniarka; P1–P3 types of treatment: P1—treatment with sea salt and sodium nitrate, P2—treatment with sea salt, and P3—treatment with sea salt and fermented milk.