| Literature DB >> 33170861 |
Hyun Min Cho1, Gemma González-Ortiz2, Diego Melo-Durán3, Jung Min Heo1, Gustavo Cordero2, Michael R Bedford2, Jae Cheol Kim2.
Abstract
This study investigated whether the inclusion of a stimbiotic (STB) can improve performance, influence intestinal microbiota and fermentation activity, and reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines in piglets fed a low zinc oxide diet without antimicrobial growth promotors compared to fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS) and mannan-oligosaccharide (MOS) when housed either in good sanitary (GS) or poor sanitary (PS) environments. One hundred forty-four male pigs (28-day-old) were sorted by initial body weight (BW) and allocated to one of six experimental treatments: 1) GS environment without any additive (GS-CTR); 2) GS environment with 0.01% stimbiotic (GS-STB); 3) PS environment (without cleaning and disinfection of a previously populated room) without any additive (PS-CTR); 4) PS environment with 0.01% STB (PS-STB); 5) PS environment with 0.1% MOS (PS-MOS); and 6) PS environment with 0.2% FOS (PS-FOS). Each treatment had six replicates, with four animals each. Three feeding phases, based on corn, wheat, and soybean meal were available ad libitum for the 42-days of the study. Housing piglets under PS conditions negatively influenced performance, increased plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), affected the fecal microbial populations and increased concentrations of branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) compared to GS. Stimbiotic improved 42-d-BW under PS conditions (P < 0.05) whereas MOS or FOS had no effect. On d35, plasma TNF-α was reduced with STB in PS (P < 0.05). The ratio between VFA:BCFA increased (P < 0.05) with STB, MOS or FOS in PS, and under GS condition, STB also increased the ratio. Stimbiotic increased the proportion of Clostridiales Family XIII Incertae Sedis and Clostridiaceae, while MOS and FOS increased Selenomonadaceae, Catabacteriaceae and Fibrobacteraceae. These results indicate that STB shifted the intestinal microbiome to favor fiber fermentation which likely contributed to reduced inflammatory response and improved performance, particularly in piglets reared in PS conditions.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33170861 PMCID: PMC7654836 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Ingredient composition and calculated and analyzed composition of the experimental diets.
| (d 0–14) | (d 14–28) | (d 28–42) | |
| Wheat | 27.38 | 20.80 | 25.00 |
| Wheat bran | 5.00 | 3.87 | 4.00 |
| Maize (corn) | 22.45 | 35.00 | 44.39 |
| Soybean meal (crude protein 47%) | 10.38 | 15.11 | 17.41 |
| Blood plasma | 5.00 | 3.00 | - |
| Fishmeal | 5.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 |
| Lactose powder | 6.00 | 5.00 | - |
| Whey (sweet) | 13.20 | 7.43 | - |
| Soya oil | 1.50 | 3.00 | 3.21 |
| Limestone | 0.98 | 0.91 | 0.69 |
| Dicalcium phosphate (18% phosphorous) | 0.77 | 1.01 | 1.25 |
| Salt | 0.50 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Zinc Oxide | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Choline chloride (50%) | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Lysine HCl | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.66 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| L-Threonine | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.21 |
| L-Tryptophan | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| L-Valine | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
| L-Isoleucine | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.04 |
| L-Leucine | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Vitamin-Mineral Premix | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Calculated chemical composition | |||
| Metabolizable energy, kcal/kg | 3,314 | 3,290 | 3,366 |
| Lysine, % | 1.65 | 1.48 | 1.34 |
| Zinc, (mg/kg) | 150 | 150 | 150 |
| Analyzed chemical composition | |||
| Gross energy, kcal/kg | 3,900 | 4,040 | 4,060 |
| Crude protein, % | 19.57 | 18.51 | 17.25 |
1Provided per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 12,000 IU; vitamin D3, 2,500 IU; vitamin E, 30 IU; vitamin K3, 3 mg; D-pantothenic acid, 15 mg; nicotinic acid, 40 mg; choline, 400 mg; and vitamin B12, 12 μg; Fe, 90 mg from iron sulfate; Cu, 8.8 mg from copper sulfate; Zn, 31.25 mg from zinc oxide; Mn, 54 mg from manganese oxide; I, 0.35 mg from potassium iodide; Se, 0.30 mg from sodium selenite.
Analyzed xylanase activities (BXU/kg) in feed samples.
| Diet phase | CTR | STB | MOS | FOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | <2,000 | 14,900 | <2,000 | <2,000 |
| Phase 2 | <2,000 | 16,900 | <2,000 | <2,000 |
| Phase 3 | <2,000 | 15,300 | <2,000 | <2,000 |
1One BXU or birch xylan unit is defined as the amount of enzyme that produces one nmol of reducing sugars from birchwood xylan in one second at 50°C and pH 5.3.
Diarrhea incidence and average number of intramuscular antibiotic intervention from d0 to d14 of the study.
| Treatments | Diarrhoea incidence (%) | Average number of antibiotic interventions (n) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NO | YES | ||
| GS-CTR | 79.2 | 20.8 | 0.92 |
| GS-STB | 83.3 | 16.7 | 0.75 |
| PS-CTR | 62.5 | 37.5 | 2.04 |
| PS-STB | 70.8 | 29.2 | 1.13 |
| PS-MOS | 75.0 | 25.0 | 1.04 |
| PS-FOS | 79.2 | 20.8 | 1.08 |
| Pooled SD | - | 2.13 | |
| 0.627 | 0.446 | ||
1Average number of intramuscular antibiotic injection per pig over first 14 days.
Effect of experimental treatments on growth performance of pigs for 42 days after weaning.
| Treatments | Body weight, kg | ADG, g/pig/d | ADFI, g/pig/d | FCR, g/g | CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS-CTR | 21.9 | 343 | 541 | 1.57 | 10.30 |
| GS-STB | 23.0 | 370 | 551 | 1.48 | 9.68d |
| PS-CTR | 20.1 | 301 | 529 | 1.74 | 11.10 |
| PS-STB | 22.1 | 348 | 526 | 1.51 | 10.07 |
| PS-FOS | 21.0 | 322 | 512 | 1.58 | 10.62 |
| PS-MOS | 20.9 | 319 | 513 | 1.60 | 10.64 |
| Pooled SD | 1.25 | 30 | 128 | 0.313 | 0.861 |
| 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.994 | 0.766 | <0.0001 |
1Experimental treatments: GS: good sanitary condition, PS: poor sanitary condition, CTR: control diet, STB: Control diet with 0.01% stimbiotics, MOS: Control diet with 0.1% mannan-oligosaccharides, FOS: Control diet with 0.2% fructo-oligosaccharides.
2Mean values for six replicate pens with four piglets per replicate pen.
3CV: coefficient of variation.
4SD, standard deviation.
5abcValues within a column with different superscripts are significantly different.
6Treatment effect analysed using the initial BW as a covariate.
Effect of experimental treatments on levels of plasma pro-inflammatory cytokines (pg/mL) and endotoxins (EU/ng) in weaned pigs.
| Item | GS-CTR | GS-STB | PS-CTR | PS-STB | PS-MOS | PS-FOS | Pooled SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | ||||||||
| IL-1ß | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.42 | 0.986 |
| IL-6 | 1.78 | 1.73 | 1.81 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.79 | 3.39 | 1.000 |
| TNF-α | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.86 | 1.000 |
| Endotoxins | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.69 | 1.000 |
| Day 7 | ||||||||
| IL-1ß | 4.50 | 2.20 | 7.26 | 5.37 | 6.25 | 5.76 | 10.0 | 0.902 |
| IL-6 | 23.5 | 15.3 | 36.0 | 24.7 | 31.9 | 24.9 | 34.6 | 0.845 |
| TNF-α | 1.17 | 1.14 | 1.64 | 1.42 | 1.52 | 1.54 | 1.32 | 0.896 |
| Endotoxins | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0.927 |
| Day 14 | ||||||||
| IL-1ß | 39 | 38 | 56 | 44 | 47 | 49 | 57 | 0.996 |
| IL-6 | 71 | 61 | 129 | 90 | 109 | 113 | 95 | 0.728 |
| TNF-α | 9.6 | 9.3 | 18.8 | 14.1 | 15.7 | 15.0 | 7.1 | 0.012 |
| Endotoxins | 0.46 | 0.42 | 1.21 | 0.76 | 1.02 | 0.98 | 1.09 | 0.349 |
| Day 21 | ||||||||
| IL-1ß | 99 | 82 | 174 | 119 | 137 | 159 | 118 | 0.481 |
| IL-6 | 182 | 161 | 237 | 203 | 212 | 192 | 155 | 0.878 |
| TNF-α | 20.9 | 20.7 | 39.0 | 29.9 | 35.5 | 36.7 | 13.8 | 0.001 |
| Endotoxins | 0.40 | 0.43 | 1.61 | 1.17 | 1.29 | 1.26 | 1.22 | 0.148 |
| Day 35 | ||||||||
| IL-1ß | 136 | 131 | 242 | 157 | 207 | 203 | 151 | 0.321 |
| IL-6 | 347 | 332 | 387 | 355 | 362 | 368 | 199 | 0.959 |
| TNF-α | 42.5 | 39.3 | 73.9 | 55.9 | 68.7 | 69.3 | 22.0 | <0.001 |
| Endotoxins | 0.73 | 0.74 | 2.42 | 1.72 | 1.98 | 2.02 | 1.77 | 0.142 |
1Experimental treatments: GS: good sanitary condition, PS: poor sanitary condition, CTR: control diet, STB: Control diet with 0.01% stimbiotics, MOS: Control diet with 0.1% mannan-oligosaccharides, FOS: Control diet with 0.2% fructo-oligosaccharides.
2Mean values for six replicate pens with one piglet per replicate pen.
3SD, standard deviation.
4abcValues within a row with different superscripts are significantly different.
Effect of experimental treatments on volatile fatty acids (VFA) and branched-chain fatty acid (BCFA) contents (mmol/kg) in faeces of weaned pigs.
| Treatment | GS-CTR | GS-STB | PS-CTR | PS-STB | PS-MOS | PS-FOS | Pooled SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | ||||||||
| Acetic | 51 | 52 | 51 | 54 | 52 | 52 | 6.22 | 0.965 |
| Propionic | 20 | 18 | 19 | 22 | 18 | 20 | 3.93 | 0.507 |
| Butyric | 18 | 15 | 19 | 14 | 18 | 19 | 2.81 | 0.010 |
| Valeric | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.1 | 6.1 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 0.86 | 0.352 |
| BCFA | 13.4 | 15.3 | 13.7 | 13.5 | 13.4 | 13.4 | 1.34 | 0.128 |
| VFA:BCFA ratio | 7.7 | 6.6 | 7.6 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 1.08 | 0.386 |
| Day 7 | ||||||||
| Acetic | 85 | 87 | 76 | 85 | 86 | 84 | 5.40 | 0.013 |
| Propionic | 19 | 23 | 18 | 25 | 23 | 24 | 3.54 | 0.021 |
| Butyric | 23 | 23 | 15 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 3.15 | 0.001 |
| Valeric | 6.1 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 1.00 | 0.145 |
| BCFA | 11.1 | 9.8 | 12.9 | 9.5 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 1.30 | 0.001 |
| VFA:BCFA ratio | 13.1 | 15.2 | 9.8 | 15.7 | 15.6 | 15.4 | 2.00 | 0.001 |
| Day 14 | ||||||||
| Acetic | 91 | 97 | 78 | 123 | 104 | 105 | 14.67 | 0.001 |
| Propionic | 22 | 26 | 20 | 25 | 26 | 22 | 5.18 | 0.308 |
| Butyric | 23 | 22 | 19 | 22 | 19 | 22 | 2.86 | 0.092 |
| Valeric | 7.4 | 5.3d | 8.4 | 5.3d | 6.8 | 5.9 | 1.10 | 0.001 |
| BCFA | 10.7 | 9.4 | 13.3 | 6.8d | 9.0 | 9.1 | 1.42 | 0.001 |
| VFA:BCFA ratio | 14.9 | 18.1 | 10.3 | 27.4 | 18.3 | 18.3 | 3.87 | 0.001 |
| Day 21 | ||||||||
| Acetic | 85 | 103 | 93 | 107 | 107 | 100 | 13.58 | 0.058 |
| Propionic | 41 | 26 | 24 | 35 | 28 | 25 | 7.96 | 0.008 |
| Butyric | 25 | 24 | 22 | 25 | 22 | 21 | 4.25 | 0.323 |
| Valeric | 8.3 | 4.7 | 7.2 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 2.16 | 0.015 |
| BCFA | 10.6 | 7.8 | 13.0 | 8.6 | 8.5 | 9.5 | 1.90 | 0.001 |
| VFA:BCFA ratio | 16.0 | 23.5 | 13.1 | 21.5 | 20.4 | 17.3 | 4.75 | 0.007 |
| Day 35 | ||||||||
| Acetic | 82 | 105 | 90 | 110 | 102 | 98 | 14.62 | 0.028 |
| Propionic | 29 | 28 | 24 | 30 | 27 | 25 | 6.47 | 0.579 |
| Butyric | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 0.56 | 0.253 |
| Valeric | 5.9 | 3.8 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 1.38 | 0.042 |
| BCFA | 11.7 | 8.4d | 13.3 | 8.5d | 9.6 | 10.5 | 1.06 | 0.001 |
| VFA:BCFA ratio | 11.1 | 17.9 | 9.5 | 18.5 | 15.5 | 13.5 | 1.70 | 0.001 |
1Experimental treatments: GS: good sanitary condition, PS: poor sanitary condition, CTR: control diet, STB: Control diet with 0.01% stimbiotics, MOS: Control diet with 0.1% mannan-oligosaccharides, FOS: Control diet with 0.2% fructo-oligosaccharides.
2Mean values for six replicate pens with one piglet per replicate pen.
3SD, standard deviation.
4abcValues within a row with different superscripts are significantly different.
Fig 1Effect of age on beta diversity, represented in the non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) plot (A) and on the relative abundance of phyla (B) of fecal samples from piglets at 0, 7, 21 and 35 of the study.
Mean values were obtained from 1 animal per replicate from each treatment on each sampling day.
Fig 2Alpha diversity (Shannon Index) of fecal samples from piglets at 0, 7, 21 and 35 of the study from good sanitary condition (GS) or poor sanitary condition (PS) and control-CTR-, stimbiotic -STB-, fructo-oligosaccharide -FOS- and mannan-oligosaccharide -MOS-.
Mean values were obtained from 1 animal per replicate from each treatment on each sampling day.
Fig 3Beta diversity of fecal samples from piglets at 0, 7, 21 and 35 of the study from good sanitary condition (GS) or poor sanitary condition (PS) and control-CTR-, stimbiotic -STB-, fructo-oligosaccharide -FOS- and mannan-oligosaccharide -MOS-.
Mean values were obtained from 1 animal per replicate from each treatment on each sampling day.
Fig 4Mean relative abundance (%) of OTU found at phylum level of fecal samples from piglets at 0, 7, 21 and 35 of the study from good sanitary condition (GS) or poor sanitary condition (PS) and control-CTR-, stimbiotic -STB-, fructo-oligosaccharide -FOS- and mannan-oligosaccharide -MOS-.
Mean values were obtained from 1 animal per replicate from each treatment on each sampling day.
Ln changes promoted by treatment on family taxa found in the fecal samples of piglets on d 35 of the study,.
| Family | GS-CTR vs GS-STB | PS-CTR vs PS-STB | PS-CTR vs PS-MOS | PS-CTR vs PS-FOS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.39 | -1.29 | ||||
| 1.74 | 2.00 | 0.70 | |||
| -0.82 | |||||
| Clostridiales Family XIII. | 1.07 | -2.94 | |||
| Incertae Sedis | |||||
| 1.24 | |||||
| -0.95 | 1.03 | 0.36 | 0.95 | ||
| -0.42 | |||||
| 0.01 | |||||
| -3.23 | |||||
| 1.80 | |||||
| -0.33 | |||||
| -0.77 | |||||
| Others | 0.22 | -0.87 | |||
| -0.06 | |||||
| 0.18 | |||||
| -1.24 | 1.44 | 0.67 | |||
| 1.30 | |||||
| -2.13 | |||||
| -0.06 |
1Experimental treatments: GS: good sanitary condition, PS: poor sanitary condition, CTR: control diet, STB: Control diet with 0.01% stimbiotics, MOS: Control diet with 0.1% mannan-oligosaccharides, FOS: Control diet with 0.2% fructo-oligosaccharides.
2Positive values and negative values indicate greater or lower abundance. Differences presented are based on all taxa detected in samples per treatment. Only significant results of changes in families (adjusted P < 0.05) are presented in the table.
3Mean values from six replicate pens with one piglet per replicate pen.
Most relevant fibrolytic species promoted or depressed (adjusted P < 0.05) based on the Ln changes compared to control treatments in the fecal samples of piglets on d35 of the study,.
| Additives | STB | MOS | FOS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanitary condition | GS | PS | PS | PS |
| Species promoted | ||||
| Species depressed | ||||
1Species promoted indicate greater abundance than the control treatment. Species depressed indicate lower abundance than the control treatment.
2Experimental treatments: GS: good sanitary condition, PS: poor sanitary condition, STB: Control diet with 0.01% stimbiotics, MOS: Control diet with 0.1% mannan-oligosaccharides, FOS: Control diet with 0.2% fructo-oligosaccharides.
3Mean values from six replicate pens with one piglet per replicate pen.