| Literature DB >> 33170072 |
Wunan Zhou1, Khaled M Abdelrahman1, Amit K Dey1, Aarthi Reddy1, Domingo E Uceda1, Sundus S Lateef1, Youssef A Elnabawi1, Paula Anzenberg1, Mina Al Najafi1, Justin A Rodante1, Andrew Keel1, Jenis Ortiz1, Heather L Teague1, Julie Erb-Alvarez1, Dolly Singh1, Aditya A Joshi1, Martin P Playford1, Marcus Y Chen1, Joel M Gelfand2, Alan T Remaley1, David A Bluemke3, Nehal N Mehta1.
Abstract
Background Myocardial infarction and premature death have been observed in patients with psoriasis. Although inflammation-driven accelerated atherosclerosis has been proposed as a mechanism, the relationship between subclinical noncalcified coronary burden (NCB), functional coronary flow impairment, and myocardial injury is unclear. Methods and Results In an ongoing longitudinal cohort study, 202 consecutive patients with psoriasis (168 at 1 year) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography to identify coronary plaque, quantify NCB, and calculate coronary fractional flow reserve by computed tomography. Serum high-sensitivity troponin-T (hs-cTn-T) was measured using a fifth-generation assay. Overall, patients were middle-aged, predominantly male, and low cardiovascular risk. A higher than median NCB associated with a positive hs-cTn-T (fully adjusted model [odds ratio (OR), 1.72; 95% CI, 1.10-2.69, P=0.018]) at baseline. Additionally, patients with a higher than median baseline NCB had higher odds of positive hs-cTn-T at 1 year in fully adjusted analyses (adjusted OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.47-3.79, P<0.001). Higher NCB was associated with a higher frequency of fractional flow reserve by computed tomography ≤0.80 (36.11% versus 25.11%, Pearson χ2=6.84, P=0.009, unadjusted OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.36-3.22, P<0.001) and higher frequency of a positive hs-cTn-T (54.36% versus 27.54%, Pearson χ2=32.23, P<0.001) in adjusted models (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.56-4.42, P<0.001). Conclusions NCB was associated with hs-cTn-T at baseline as well as at 1 year. Furthermore, patients with high NCB had higher prevalence of fractional flow reserve by computed tomography ≤0.80 and a >2- fold higher odds of positive hs-cTn-T. These findings underscore the importance of early vascular disease in driving myocardial injury, and support conduct of myocardial perfusion studies to better understand these findings.Entities:
Keywords: fractional flow reserve; myocardial injury; noncalcified coronary burden; psoriasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33170072 PMCID: PMC7763703 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.017417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Figure 1Recruitment scheme of the study
CCTA indicates coronary computed tomography angiography.
Figure 2Subjects with psoriasis were prospectively enrolled to undergo CCTA assessment and measurement of serum hs‐cTn‐T using a fifth‐generation assay
The CCTA data were used to quantify NCB and calculate FFRCT. CCTA indicates coronary computed tomography angiography; CT, computed tomography; FFRCT, fractional flow reserve by computed tomography; NCB, noncalcified coronary burden; and hs‐cTn‐T, high‐sensitivity troponin‐T.
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Cohort by NCB
| Total Cohort (n=202) | Low NCB (n=102) | High NCB (n=100) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics and clinical characteristics | ||||
| Age, y | 50.3 (±12.6) | 49.60 (±12.87) | 51.07 (±12.39) | 0.41 |
| Male, n (%) | 124 (61) | 46 (45.1) | 78 (78) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 56 (28) | 19 (18.6) | 37 (37.8) | 0.003 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 85 (42) | 39 (38.2) | 46 (46) | 0.32 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 19 (9) | 8 (7.8) | 11 (11) | 0.48 |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 25 (12) | 15 (14.7) | 10 (10) | 0.39 |
| Framingham risk score | 1.90 (0.57–5.25) | 1.13 (0.41– 3.93) | 3.17 (1.15–7.39) | <0.001 |
| Waist:hip ratio | 0.95 (±0.08) | 0.93 (±0.08) | 0.97 (±0.07) | <0.001 |
| Psoriasis characterization | ||||
| Psoriasis area severity index score | 5.5 (3.0–8.9) | 5 (2.8–8.9) | 6.1 (3–9.1) | 0.44 |
| Medications | ||||
| Cardiovascular | ||||
| Anti‐hypertensives, n (%) | 45 (22) | 16 (15.7) | 29 (29) | 0.028 |
| Lipid‐lowering medications, n (%) | 60 (30) | 23 (22.5) | 37 (37) | 0.031 |
| Diabetes mellitus medications, n (%) | 15 (8) | 6 (5.9) | 9 (9) | 0.44 |
| Psoriasis | ||||
| Biologic therapy, n (%) | 69 (34) | 36 (35.3) | 33 (33) | 0.87 |
| Topical therapy, n (%) | 122 (61) | 62 (61.4) | 60 (60.6) | 1 |
| Light therapy, n (%) | 23 (12) | 11 (10.9) | 12 (12) | 0.91 |
| Laboratory values | ||||
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 185.32 (±39.91) | 192.81 (±40.48) | 177.67 (±38.01) | 0.007 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 57.21 (±19.90) | 64.25 (±23.20) | 50.03 (±12.32) | <0.001 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 104.35 (±32.66) | 106.85 (±33.32) | 101.80 (±31.93) | 0.27 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 120.89 (±74.13) | 110.25 (±67.98) | 131.73 (±78.78) | 0.039 |
| hs‐CRP, mg/L | 3.88 (±6.77) | 3.05 (±5.15) | 4.72 (±8.04) | 0.08 |
| Log hs‐cTn‐T | 1.92 (±0.24) | 1.86 (±0.16) | 1.99 (±0.28) | <0.001 |
| Positive hs‐cTn‐T, n (%) | 72 (36) | 21 (20.6) | 51 (51) | <0.001 |
| Coronary artery characterization | ||||
| Obstructive CAD, n (%) | 4 (2) | 1 (1) | 3 (3) | 1.00 |
| Total coronary burden (mm2 ×100) | 1.20 (±0.52) | 1.07 (±0.47) | 1.33 (±0.54) | <0.001 |
| Noncalcified coronary burden (mm2 ×100) | 1.14 (±0.51) | 1.04 (±0.48) | 1.25 (±0.51) | <0.001 |
| Dense calcified coronary burden (mm2 ×100) | 0.06 (±0.11) | 0.04 (±0.07) | 0.08 (±0.15) | <0.001 |
| Presence of high‐risk plaque, n (%) | 26 (14.4) | 6 (7) | 20 (22) | 0.003 |
| Positive remodeling, n (%) | 22 (12.2) | 5 (5) | 17 (19) | 0.006 |
| Low attenuation, n (%) | 17 (9.4) | 5 (5) | 12 (13) | 0.080 |
| Abnormal FFRCT≤0.80, n (%) | 61 (61) | 25 (25) | 36 (36) | 0.009 |
Values are mean (± SD), median (Q1, Q3), or number (%).
CAD indicates coronary artery disease; FFRCT, fractional flow reserve by computed tomography; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; hs‐CRP, high‐sensitivity C‐ reactive protein; hs‐cTn‐T, high‐sensitivity troponin‐T; and LDL, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Association Among Total Coronary Burden, NCB, and Positive hs‐cTn‐T
| N=202 Patients, N=606 Coronary Vessels | Total Coronary Burden | NCB |
|---|---|---|
|
OR (95% CI, |
OR (95% CI, | |
| Model 1 (unadjusted) |
3.26 (2.29–4.63, |
2.78 (1.97–3.93, |
| Model 2 (adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia) |
2.01 (1.31–3.07, |
1.84 (1.21–2.80, |
| Model 3 (adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, WHR) |
1.94 (1.25–3.00, |
1.78 (1.15–2.75, |
| Model 4 (adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, WHR, lipid therapy) |
1.94 (1.25–3.00, |
1.78 (1.15– 2.75, |
| Model 5 (adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, WHR, lipid therapy, left ventricular hypertrophy) |
1.98 (1.28–3.07, |
1.82 (1.18–2.81, |
| Model 6 (adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, WHR, lipid therapy, left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary plaque) |
1.88 (1.20–2.96, |
1.72 (1.10–2.69, |
hs‐cTn‐T indicates high‐sensitivity troponin‐T; NCB, noncalcified coronary burden; OR, odds ratio; and WHR, waist:hip ratio.
Figure 3Association between noncalcified coronary burden and log hs‐cTn‐T in patients with positive hs‐cTn‐T (adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, waist:hip ratio, lipid therapy, left ventricular hypertrophy, and coronary plaque)
hs‐cTn‐T indicates high‐sensitivity troponin‐T.
Figure 4Percent positive hs‐cTn‐T at baseline and at 1‐year follow‐up
hs‐cTn‐T indicates high‐sensitivity troponin‐T; and NCB, noncalcified coronary burden.