Michael J Cavnar1,2, Kenneth Seier3, Mithat Gönen3, Christina Curtin1, Vinod P Balachandran1, William D Tap4,5, Cristina R Antonescu6, Sam Singer1, Ronald P DeMatteo7,8. 1. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. ronald.dematteo@pennmedicine.edu. 8. Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. ronald.dematteo@pennmedicine.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant imatinib (Neo-IM) therapy may facilitate R0 resection in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) that are large or in difficult anatomic locations. While response to preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitors is associated with better outcome in metastatic GIST, little is known about prognostic factors after Neo-IM in primary GIST. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with primary GIST with or without synchronous metastases who underwent Neo-IM were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective maintained institutional database for Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), tumor viability, and mitotic rate. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and compared by log-rank test. Cox proportionate hazard models were used for univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients were treated for a median of 7.1 months (range 0.2-160). By RECIST, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were seen in 40%, 51%, and 9%, respectively. By pathologic analysis, ≤ 50% of the tumor was viable in 72%, and the mitotic rate was ≤ 5/50HPF in 74%. On multivariate analysis, RECIST response and tumor viability were not associated with OS, while post-treatment high mitotic rate (hazard ratio (HR) for death 5.3, CI 2.3-12.4), R2 margins (HR 6.0, CI 2.3-15.5), and adjuvant imatinib (HR 0.4, CI 0.2-0.9) were (p < 0.05). Five-year OS was 81 vs. 38% for low vs. high mitotic rate; 81, 59, and 39% for R0, R1, and R2 margins; and 75 vs 61% for adjuvant vs. no adjuvant imatinib therapy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In primary GIST undergoing Neo-IM therapy, progression was uncommon, but substantial down-sizing occurred in the minority. High tumor mitotic rate and incomplete resection following Neo-IM were associated with poor outcome, while adjuvant imatinib was associated with prolonged survival.
INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant imatinib (Neo-IM) therapy may facilitate R0 resection in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) that are large or in difficult anatomic locations. While response to preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitors is associated with better outcome in metastatic GIST, little is known about prognostic factors after Neo-IM in primary GIST. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with primary GIST with or without synchronous metastases who underwent Neo-IM were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective maintained institutional database for Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), tumor viability, and mitotic rate. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and compared by log-rank test. Cox proportionate hazard models were used for univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients were treated for a median of 7.1 months (range 0.2-160). By RECIST, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were seen in 40%, 51%, and 9%, respectively. By pathologic analysis, ≤ 50% of the tumor was viable in 72%, and the mitotic rate was ≤ 5/50HPF in 74%. On multivariate analysis, RECIST response and tumor viability were not associated with OS, while post-treatment high mitotic rate (hazard ratio (HR) for death 5.3, CI 2.3-12.4), R2 margins (HR 6.0, CI 2.3-15.5), and adjuvant imatinib (HR 0.4, CI 0.2-0.9) were (p < 0.05). Five-year OS was 81 vs. 38% for low vs. high mitotic rate; 81, 59, and 39% for R0, R1, and R2 margins; and 75 vs 61% for adjuvant vs. no adjuvant imatinib therapy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In primary GIST undergoing Neo-IM therapy, progression was uncommon, but substantial down-sizing occurred in the minority. High tumor mitotic rate and incomplete resection following Neo-IM were associated with poor outcome, while adjuvant imatinib was associated with prolonged survival.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Danielle A Bischof; Yuhree Kim; Dan G Blazer; Ramy Behman; Paul J Karanicolas; Calvin H Law; Fayez A Quereshy; Shishir K Maithel; T Clark Gamblin; Todd W Bauer; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Mark Fairweather; Vinod P Balachandran; George Z Li; Monica M Bertagnolli; Cristina Antonescu; William Tap; Samuel Singer; Ronald P DeMatteo; Chandrajit P Raut Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Christopher L Corless; Karla V Ballman; Cristina R Antonescu; Violetta Kolesnikova; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; Martin E Blackstein; Charles D Blanke; George D Demetri; Michael C Heinrich; Margaret von Mehren; Shreyaskumar Patel; Martin D McCarter; Kouros Owzar; Ronald P DeMatteo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Heikki Joensuu; Aki Vehtari; Jaakko Riihimäki; Toshirou Nishida; Sonja E Steigen; Peter Brabec; Lukas Plank; Bengt Nilsson; Claudia Cirilli; Chiara Braconi; Andrea Bordoni; Magnus K Magnusson; Zdenek Linke; Jozef Sufliarsky; Massimo Federico; Jon G Jonasson; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Piotr Rutkowski Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Piotr Rutkowski; Alessandro Gronchi; Peter Hohenberger; Sylvie Bonvalot; Patrick Schöffski; Sebastian Bauer; Elena Fumagalli; Pawel Nyckowski; Buu-Phuc Nguyen; Jan Martijn Kerst; Marco Fiore; Elzbieta Bylina; Mathias Hoiczyk; Annemieke Cats; Paolo G Casali; Axel Le Cesne; Jürgen Treckmann; Eberhard Stoeckle; Johannes H W de Wilt; Stefan Sleijfer; Ronald Tielen; Winette van der Graaf; Cornelis Verhoef; Frits van Coevorden Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Burton L Eisenberg; Jonathan Harris; Charles D Blanke; George D Demetri; Michael C Heinrich; James C Watson; John P Hoffman; Scott Okuno; John M Kane; Margaret von Mehren Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Heikki Joensuu; Mikael Eriksson; Kirsten Sundby Hall; Annette Reichardt; Jörg T Hartmann; Daniel Pink; Giuliano Ramadori; Peter Hohenberger; Salah-Eddin Al-Batran; Marcus Schlemmer; Sebastian Bauer; Eva Wardelmann; Bengt Nilsson; Harri Sihto; Petri Bono; Raija Kallio; Jouni Junnila; Thor Alvegård; Peter Reichardt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael J Cavnar; Lin Wang; Vinod P Balachandran; Cristina R Antonescu; William D Tap; Mary Keohan; Sam Singer; Larissa Temple; Garrett M Nash; Martin R Weiser; Jose G Guillem; Julio Garcia Aguilar; Ronald P DeMatteo; Philip B Paty Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Michael J Cavnar; Kenneth Seier; Christina Curtin; Vinod P Balachandran; Daniel G Coit; Sam S Yoon; Aimee M Crago; Vivian E Strong; William D Tap; Mithat Gönen; Cristina R Antonescu; Murray F Brennan; Sam Singer; Ronald P DeMatteo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Nikolaos Vassos; Jens Jakob; Georg Kähler; Peter Reichardt; Alexander Marx; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Nils Rathmann; Eva Wardelmann; Peter Hohenberger Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Sara Renberg; Yifan Zhang; Fredrik Karlsson; Robert Bränström; Jan Åhlen; Li Jalmsell; Christina Linder-Stragliotto; Felix Haglund de Flon; Andri Papakonstantinou Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2022-05-14 Impact factor: 7.316