Nikolaos Vassos1,2, Jens Jakob3, Georg Kähler2, Peter Reichardt4, Alexander Marx5, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss6, Nils Rathmann7, Eva Wardelmann8, Peter Hohenberger1. 1. Mannheim University Medical Center, Division of Surgical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. 2. Mannheim University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. 3. Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany. 4. Department of Oncology and Palliative Care, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, 13125 Berlin, Germany. 5. Mannheim University Medical Center, Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. 6. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, 69210 Heidelberg, Germany. 7. Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Mannheim University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. 8. Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) for advanced, non-metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of stomach is recommended to downsize the tumor prompting less-extensive operations and preservation of organ function. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical-histopathological profile and oncological outcome of 55 patients (median age 58.2 years; range, 30-86 years) with biopsy-proven, cM0, gastric GIST who underwent IM therapy followed by surgery with a median follow-up of 82 months. RESULTS: Initial median tumor size was 113 mm (range, 65-330 mm) and 10 patients started with acute upper GI bleeding. After a median 10 months (range, 2-21 months) of treatment, tumor size had shrunk to 62 mm (range, 22-200 mm). According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.0 and version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), 39 (75%) patients had partial response and 14 patients had stable disease, with no progressive disease. At plateau response, 50 patients underwent surgery with an R0 resection rate of 94% and pathological complete response in 24%. In 12 cases (24%), downstaging allowed laparoscopic resection. The mean recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 123 months (95%CI; 99-147) and the estimated 5-year RFS was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant IM allowed stomach preservation in 96% of our patients with excellent long-term RFS, even when starting treatment during an episode of upper GI bleeding. Preservation of the stomach provides the physiological basis for the use of oral IM in the adjuvant or metastatic setting.
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) for advanced, non-metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of stomach is recommended to downsize the tumor prompting less-extensive operations and preservation of organ function. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical-histopathological profile and oncological outcome of 55 patients (median age 58.2 years; range, 30-86 years) with biopsy-proven, cM0, gastric GIST who underwent IM therapy followed by surgery with a median follow-up of 82 months. RESULTS: Initial median tumor size was 113 mm (range, 65-330 mm) and 10 patients started with acute upper GI bleeding. After a median 10 months (range, 2-21 months) of treatment, tumor size had shrunk to 62 mm (range, 22-200 mm). According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.0 and version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), 39 (75%) patients had partial response and 14 patients had stable disease, with no progressive disease. At plateau response, 50 patients underwent surgery with an R0 resection rate of 94% and pathological complete response in 24%. In 12 cases (24%), downstaging allowed laparoscopic resection. The mean recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 123 months (95%CI; 99-147) and the estimated 5-year RFS was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant IM allowed stomach preservation in 96% of our patients with excellent long-term RFS, even when starting treatment during an episode of upper GI bleeding. Preservation of the stomach provides the physiological basis for the use of oral IM in the adjuvant or metastatic setting.
Authors: P G Casali; N Abecassis; H T Aro; S Bauer; R Biagini; S Bielack; S Bonvalot; I Boukovinas; J V M G Bovee; T Brodowicz; J M Broto; A Buonadonna; E De Álava; A P Dei Tos; X G Del Muro; P Dileo; M Eriksson; A Fedenko; V Ferraresi; A Ferrari; S Ferrari; A M Frezza; S Gasperoni; H Gelderblom; T Gil; G Grignani; A Gronchi; R L Haas; B Hassan; P Hohenberger; R Issels; H Joensuu; R L Jones; I Judson; P Jutte; S Kaal; B Kasper; K Kopeckova; D A Krákorová; A Le Cesne; I Lugowska; O Merimsky; M Montemurro; M A Pantaleo; R Piana; P Picci; S Piperno-Neumann; A L Pousa; P Reichardt; M H Robinson; P Rutkowski; A A Safwat; P Schöffski; S Sleijfer; S Stacchiotti; K Sundby Hall; M Unk; F Van Coevorden; W T A van der Graaf; J Whelan; E Wardelmann; O Zaikova; J Y Blay Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: S Hirota; K Isozaki; Y Moriyama; K Hashimoto; T Nishida; S Ishiguro; K Kawano; M Hanada; A Kurata; M Takeda; G Muhammad Tunio; Y Matsuzawa; Y Kanakura; Y Shinomura; Y Kitamura Journal: Science Date: 1998-01-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: George D Demetri; Yanfeng Wang; Elisabeth Wehrle; Amy Racine; Zariana Nikolova; Charles D Blanke; Heikki Joensuu; Margaret von Mehren Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; Anette Duensing; Laura McGreevey; Chang-Jie Chen; Nora Joseph; Samuel Singer; Diana J Griffith; Andrea Haley; Ajia Town; George D Demetri; Christopher D M Fletcher; Jonathan A Fletcher Journal: Science Date: 2003-01-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sara Renberg; Yifan Zhang; Fredrik Karlsson; Robert Bränström; Jan Åhlen; Li Jalmsell; Christina Linder-Stragliotto; Felix Haglund de Flon; Andri Papakonstantinou Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2022-05-14 Impact factor: 7.316