| Literature DB >> 33168744 |
Zhuolei Zhang1, Ji Su1,2, Ana Sanz Matias1, Madeleine Gordon1,3, Yi-Sheng Liu4, Jinghua Guo4, Chengyu Song5, Chaochao Dun1, David Prendergast6, Gabor A Somorjai7,8, Jeffrey J Urban6.
Abstract
Employing liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs) to transportEntities:
Keywords: BN; LOHCs; metal–support interaction; methanol dehydrogenation; transition metal
Year: 2020 PMID: 33168744 PMCID: PMC7703534 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2015897117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Schematic illustration of the formation of defective BN nanosheets and further deposition of Ni nanoclusters. Defective BN nanosheets (B) were prepared from bulk BN (A) by a combined exfoliation method of gas exfoliation and lithium intercalation-based exfoliation. Ni nanoclusters were deposited by in situ reaction of lithium naphthalenide with [Ni(Cp)2] (Cp = C5H5) in the BN nanosheets solution. Proposed “pit” structure of the Ni/BN nanocomposite (C).
Fig. 4.Experimental and calculated spectroscopic characteristics of pristine bulk BN, exfoliated BN nanosheets, and Ni/BN nanocomposite. (A) Experimental (solid lines) and calculated (dashed lines) X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) spectra of pristine BN, BN nanosheets around the B K-edge. (B) The main contributing core-excited state to the W peak of the B atom in the BN3–Ni4 bonding configuration (Bottom). (Inset) Top (Top Right) and side (Top Left) views of the structure of Ni4 adsorbed on pristine h-BN. (C) Calculated B K-edge XAS spectra of B atoms in bonding configurations BN3, BN3–Ni, and BN3–Ni2 within the structure of Ni4 adsorbed on pristine h-BN (dotted lines), together with experimental Ni-decorated exfoliated h-BN XAS spectra (green). (D) XAS X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of nickel nanoclusters deposited on BN nanosheets with various particle sizes (I, ∼10 nm; II, ∼5 nm; III, ∼1.5 nm).
Fig. 2.Morphology and structure characteristics of exfoliated BN nanosheets and Ni/BN nanocomposite. (A) Low-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of typical exfoliated BN nanosheets. (B) Aberration-corrected high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of typical exfoliated BN nanosheet at the same location at different focus (Top, under focus; Bottom, over focus). (C) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of a typical exfoliated BN nanosheet. (D) The low-resolution TEM image of typical Ni nanoclusters deposited on exfoliated BN nanosheets. (Inset) Size distribution of Ni nanoclusters. (E) HRTEM images of a typical Ni nanocluster deposited on exfoliated BN nanosheets, which clearly shows the lattice structure of BN nanosheet and Ni nanocluster, respectively. (F) X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of bulk BN, exfoliated BN nanosheets, and Ni/BN nanocomposite.
Fig. 3.Spectroscopic characteristics of pristine bulk BN, exfoliated BN nanosheets, and Ni/BN nanocomposite. (A) The Raman spectra of typical pristine bulk BN, exfoliated BN nanosheets, and Ni/BN nanocomposite. (B) Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of pristine BN, BN nanosheets, and Ni/BN nanocomposite.
Fig. 5.Catalytic performance of Ni nanoclusters on various substrates for methanol dehydrogenation. (A) Hydrogen productivity of Ni/BN nanocomposite with various Ni nanocluster sizes. (B) Temperature-dependent hydrogen productivity of Ni nanoclusters on various substrates at the methanol feeding rate of 0.1 mL/min. (C) Selectivity and (D) the long-term durability of various catalysts for methanol dehydrogenation (methanol feeding rate, 0.1 mL/min; N2 feeding rate, 30 mL/min; temperature, 300 °C).
Fig. 6.(A) Comparison of the relative energies of the methanol dehydrogenation and CHx. (B) Intermediates in the edges (green) of the Ni38 NP, and on Ni(111) (black).
Fig. 7.Scheme summarizing nanoparticle size effects on methanol dehydrogenation: dehydrogenation with enhanced formaldehyde adsorption on model Ni NP on BN pit (Top) and on Ni(111) (Bottom).