| Literature DB >> 33167465 |
Serkan Tokgöz1, Dilip K Lakshman2, Mahmoud H Ghozlan1, Hasan Pinar1, Daniel P Roberts2, Amitava Mitra1.
Abstract
The root nodules are a unique environment formed on legume roots through a highly specific symbiotic relationship between leguminous plants and nodule-inducing bacteria. Previously, Rhizobia were presumed to be the only group of bacteria residing within nodules. However, recent studies discovered diverse groups of bacteria within the legume nodules. In this report soybean nodule-associated bacteria were studied in an effort to identify beneficial bacteria for plant disease control and growth promotion. Analysis of surface-sterilized single nodules showed bacterial diversity of the nodule microbiome. Five hundred non-rhizobial colonies from 10 nodules, 50 colonies per nodule, were tested individually against the tomato wilt causing bacterial pathogen Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) for inhibition of pathogen growth. From the initial screening, 54 isolates were selected based on significant growth inhibition of Cmm. These isolates were further tested in vitro on another bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) and two fungal pathogens Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Bacterial metabolites were extracted from 15 selected isolates with ethanol and tested against pathogen Cmm and Pst. These isolates were identified by using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Pseudomonas spp. were the dominant soybean nodule-associated non-rhizobial bacterial group. Several isolates imparted significant protection against pathogens and/or plant growth promotion on tomato seedlings. The most promising nodule-associated bacterial isolate that suppressed both Cmm and Pst in vitro and Pst in tomato seedlings was identified as a Proteus species. Isolation and identification of beneficial nodule-associated bacteria established the foundation for further exploration of potential nodule-associated bacteria for plant protection and growth promotion.Entities:
Keywords: disease control; growth promotion; leguminous plants; non-rhizobial bacteria; rhizobia; root nodule; soybean
Year: 2020 PMID: 33167465 PMCID: PMC7694458 DOI: 10.3390/plants9111494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1The ranking of in vitro antibacterial activity of nodule endophytes against bacterial pathogens. The inhibitory zones represent diameters in mm from the center of filter discs.
Figure 2Antibacterial activity of select nodule endophytes against Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (A) and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (B). Antagonism is indicated by the clear zone of lysis surrounding the filters containing a nodule bacterial endophyte.
Figure 3In vitro growth inhibitory activity of representative nodule endophytes against Rhizoctonia solani (RS) and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (SS). Figure shows representative isolates.
Figure 4Antagonistic effects of metabolites extracted from a few selected nodule endophytes against Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) (A) and GFP-tagged Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) (B, observed with a hand-held UV lamp) on solid plates. Antagonism is indicated by the clear zone of lysis of Cmm/Pst surrounding the filters containing extracts from selected nodule bacterial endophytes. Each plate contains one disk with 25 μL of bacterial inoculums (Cmm or Pst) and two discs containing 5 and 10 μL of metabolites isolated from one of the selected isolates. The plates were kept at room temperature for 24 h. Filter discs with 10 μL of water served as control.
Bacterial identification based on Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Two independent colonies were assayed from each isolates. Same colony assayed three time generated identical data.
| Sample ID | MALDI TOF MS Based ID | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 108 ia |
| 1.91 |
| 113 id |
| 1.97 |
| 115 ic |
| 1.93 |
| 134 ia |
| 2.32 |
| 138 id |
| 1.96 |
| NT 21 |
| 2.33 |
| NT 76 ia |
| 2.36 |
| 108 ic |
| 2.12 |
| 140 ic |
| 1.93 |
| NT 76 ie |
| 1.89 |
| 125 ib |
| 1.84 |
| 3 |
| 1.96 |
| NT 158 |
| 2.40 |
| 131 id |
| 1.98 |
| NT 88 | 1.97 |
Identification of individual nodule-associated bacterial isolates based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon.
| Sample ID | 16S Based ID | Closest Genbank Match (>99%) |
|---|---|---|
| 108 ia |
| NBAT01000000 |
| 113 id |
| CP011301 |
| 115 ic |
| NBAT01000000 |
| 134 ia |
| AP013070 |
| 138 id |
| CP003071 |
| NT 21 |
| EU733519 |
| NT 76 ia |
| CP00884 |
| 108 ic |
| NBAT01000000 |
| 140 ic |
| CP005975 |
| NT 76 ie |
| NHAS01000000 |
| 125 ib |
| AB859067 |
| 3 |
| CO5028 |
| NT 158 |
| KJ668861 |
| 131 id |
| |
| NT 88 |
| AB778290 |
Non-rhizobial bacterial genera found in a single soybean nodule. Separate DNA extracts made from three soybean nodules were used for individual 16S sequencing, three individual nodules showed identical species composition.
| Genus | Family | Order | Class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhizobiaceae | Rhizobiales | Alphaproteobacteria | |
| Brucellaceae | Rhizobiales | Alphaproteobacteria | |
| Burkholderiaceae | Burkholderiales | Betaproteobacteria | |
| Pseudomonadaceae | Pseudomonadales | Gammaproteobacteria | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | Enterobacteriales | Gammaproteobacteria | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | Enterobacteriales | Gammaproteobacteria | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | Enterobacteriales | Gammaproteobacteria | |
| Moraxellaceae | Pseudomonadales | Gammaproteobacteria |
Figure 5Suppression of bacterial speck disease on tomato plants following mix inoculation of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato with a nodule endophytic bacterium Proteus sp. (isolate 3) (A) Symptom development in tomato plants inoculated with GFP-tagged Pst alone, (A*) same leaves observed with a hand-held UV lamp. (B) Symptom development in tomato plants inoculated with mixed culture of Pst and nodule-associated isolate 3 (Proteus sp.), (B*) same leaves observed with a hand-held UV lamp. (C) Tomato plants inoculated with nodule-associated bacteria Proteus sp. alone. (D) Untreated control plants. (E) Magnified image of Pst inoculated leaf showing leaf-speck symptom.
Evaluation of 15 nodule-associated bacteria for their antagonistic potential against Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis in tomato plants in pathogen-infested soil under greenhouse conditions. A minimum of five seedlings were used for each treatment and the entire experiment was repeated three times. Control treatment comprised inoculation only with Cmm.
| Treatments | Shoot Height (cm) | Shoot Biomass (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 50 ± 8.8 | 58.2 ± 17.2 |
| 115ic | 55.4 ± 7.9 * | 77.6 ± 29.3 ** |
| 3 | 54.1 ± 5.1 | 67.1 ± 37.2 |
| NT158 | 53.8 ± 11.8 | 71.3 ± 30.4 |
| NT21 | 52.5 ± 7.8 | 72.3 ± 29.6 |
| NT76ia | 52.1 ± 12.3 | 61.1 ± 25.8 |
| 138id | 55.4 ± 12.4 * | 64.7 ± 29.6 |
| 113id | 56.9 ± 9 ** | 59.1 ± 23.8 |
| NT134ia | 60.5 ± 5.4 *** | 78.0 ± 19.7 ** |
| 108ia | 53.8 ± 7.8 | 58.0 ± 22.1 |
| NT88 | 56.6 ± 9 ** | 59.1 ± 21.9 |
| 131id | 53.1 ± 6.7 | 66.8 ± 20.4 |
| NT76ie | 56.1 ± 4.5 * | 61.4 ± 23.7 |
| 108ic | 51.1 ± 4.9 | 57.9 ± 22.7 |
| 125ib | 56.9 ± 8.7 ** | 72.9 ± 14.5 * |
| 140ic | 52.6 ± 8.7 | 58.5 ± 23.1 |
* Statistically significant at 0.05 (p values). ** Statistically significant at 0.01 (p values). *** Statistically significant at 0.001 (p values).
Evaluation of the fifteen nodule-associated bacteria for their growth promotion potential in tomato plants under greenhouse conditions. A minimum of five seedlings were used for each treatment and the entire experiment was repeated three times.
| Treatments | Shoot Height (cm) | Shoot Biomass (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 60.2 ± 5.7 | 76.1 ± 20.4 |
| 115ic | 59.7 ± 11.1 | 81.1 ± 22.2 |
| 3 | 55.1 ± 11.2 | 70.7 ± 19.7 |
| NT158 | 58.7 ± 13.8 | 69.3 ± 16.5 |
| NT21 | 55.6 ± 9.2 | 74.6 ± 22.7 |
| NT76ia | 59.4 ± 9.9 | 69.2 ± 24.4 |
| 138id | 64.3 ± 4.3 | 85.1 ± 18.8 |
| 113id | 61.7 ± 5.5 | 84.0 ± 20.8 |
| NT134ia | 69.1 ± 7.9 *** | 90.9 ± 17.2 * |
| 108ia | 67.6 ± 4.8 ** | 89.5 ± 13.2 * |
| NT88 | 66.8 ± 3.3 * | 95.3 ± 12.2 ** |
| 131id | 59.4 ± 9.2 | 88.5 ± 29.2 * |
| NT76ie | 59.7 ± 6.1 | 78.8 ± 24.5 |
| 108ic | 60.5 ± 8.4 | 79.6 ± 19.5 |
| 125ib | 59.2 ± 9.7 | 77.5 ± 17.8 |
| 140ic | 60.2 ± 11.1 | 89.5 ± 26.7 * |
* Statistically significant at 0.05 (p values). ** Statistically significant at 0.01 (p values). *** Statistically significant at 0.001 (p values).
Figure 6Effects of four selected endophytes on growth promotion of tomato plants grown in pasteurized potting mix. (A) Untreated control plants. (B) Treated with the isolate 140ic. (C) Treated with the isolate 108ia. (D) Treated with the isolate NT88. (E) Treated with the isolate NT134ia.