Literature DB >> 33165223

Towards Best Practices in Clinical Magnetoencephalography: Patient Preparation and Data Acquisition.

John C Mosher1, Michael E Funke2.   

Abstract

A magnetoencephalography (MEG) recording for clinical purposes requires a different level of attention and detail than that for research. As contrasted with a research subject, the MEG technologist must work with a patient who may not fully cooperate with instructions. The patient is on a clinical schedule, with generally no opportunity to return due to an erroneous or poor acquisition. The data will generally be processed by separate MEG analysts, who require a consistent and high-quality recording to complete their analysis and clinical report. To assure a quality recording, (1) MEG technologists must immediately recheck their scalp measurement data during the patient preparation, to catch disturbances and ensure registration accuracy of the patient fiducials, electrodes, and head position indicator coils. During the recording, (2) the technologist must ensure that the patient remains quiet and as far as possible into the helmet. After the recording, (3) the technologist must consistently prepare the data for subsequent clinical analysis. This article aims to comprehensively address these matters for practitioners of clinical MEG in a helpful and practical way. Based on the authors' experiences in recording over three thousand patients between them, presented here are a collection of techniques for implementation into daily routines that ensure good operation and high data quality. The techniques address a gap in the clinical literature addressing the multitude of potential sources of error during patient preparation and data acquisition, and how to prevent, recognize, or correct those.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33165223      PMCID: PMC7665271          DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.590


  16 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity of seizure-onset zone estimation by ictal magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Mordekhay Medvedovsky; Samu Taulu; Eija Gaily; Eeva-Liisa Metsähonkala; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Dana Ekstein; Svetlana Kipervasser; Miri Y Neufeld; Uri Kramer; Göran Blomstedt; Itzhak Fried; Atte Karppinen; Igor Veshchev; Reina Roivainen; Bruria Ben-Zeev; Hadassah Goldberg-Stern; Juha Wilenius; Ritva Paetau
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 2.  Combining MEG and EEG source modeling in epilepsy evaluations.

Authors:  John S Ebersole; Susan M Ebersole
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 3.  American Clinical Magnetoencephalography Society Clinical Practice Guideline 3: MEG-EEG reporting.

Authors:  Anto I Bagić; Robert C Knowlton; Douglas F Rose; John S Ebersole
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 4.  American Clinical Magnetoencephalography Society Clinical Practice Guideline 4: qualifications of MEG-EEG personnel.

Authors:  Anto I Bagić; Gregory L Barkley; Douglas F Rose; John S Ebersole
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.177

5.  American Clinical MEG Society (ACMEGS) Position Statement #2: The Value of Magnetoencephalography (MEG)/Magnetic Source Imaging (MSI) in Noninvasive Presurgical Mapping of Eloquent Cortices of Patients Preparing for Surgical Interventions.

Authors:  Anto I Bagić; Susan M Bowyer; Heidi E Kirsch; Michael E Funke; Richard C Burgess
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.177

6.  Ictal magnetic source imaging as a localizing tool in partial epilepsy.

Authors:  D S Eliashiv; S M Elsas; K Squires; I Fried; J Engel
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-11-26       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Riitta Hari; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth Barnes; Richard Burgess; Nina Forss; Joachim Gross; Matti Hämäläinen; Ole Jensen; Ryusuke Kakigi; François Mauguière; Nobukatzu Nakasato; Aina Puce; Gian-Luca Romani; Alfons Schnitzler; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Magnetoencephalographic Recordings in Infants: A Retrospective Analysis of Seizure-Focus Yield and Postsurgical Outcomes.

Authors:  Stephanie Garcia-Tarodo; Michael Funke; Lisa Caballero; Liang Zhu; Manish N Shah; Gretchen K Von Allmen
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis.

Authors:  François Tadel; Sylvain Baillet; John C Mosher; Dimitrios Pantazis; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Indications for Inpatient Magnetoencephalography in Children - An Institution's Experience.

Authors:  Michael W Watkins; Ekta G Shah; Michael E Funke; Stephanie Garcia-Tarodo; Manish N Shah; Nitin Tandon; Fernando Maestu; Christopher Laohathai; David I Sandberg; Jeremy Lankford; Stephen Thompson; John Mosher; Gretchen Von Allmen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.