OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, preliminary efficacy, and acceptability of auricular percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia in veterans, using neuroimaging as an outcome measure and a biomarker of treatment response. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, single-blind. SETTING: Government hospital. SUBJECTS:Twenty-one veterans with fibromyalgia were randomized to standard therapy (ST) control or ST with auricular PENFS treatment. METHODS: Participants received weekly visits with a pain practitioner over 4 weeks. The PENFS group received reapplication of PENFS at each weekly visit. Resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fcMRI) data were collected within 2 weeks prior to initiating treatment and 2 weeks following the final treatment. Analysis of rs-fcMRI used a right posterior insula seed. Pain and function were assessed at baseline and at 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: At 12 weeks post-treatment, there was a nonsignificant trend toward improved pain scores and significant improvements in pain interference with sleep among the PENFS treatment group as compared with the ST controls. Neuroimaging data displayed increased connectivity to areas of the cerebellum and executive control networks in the PENFS group as compared with the ST control group following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend toward improved pain and function among veterans with fibromyalgia in the ST + PENFS group as compared with the ST control group. Pain and functional outcomes correlated with altered rs-fcMRI network connectivity. Neuroimaging results differed between groups, suggesting an alternative underlying mechanism for PENFS analgesia. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine 2020.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, preliminary efficacy, and acceptability of auricular percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia in veterans, using neuroimaging as an outcome measure and a biomarker of treatment response. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, single-blind. SETTING: Government hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one veterans with fibromyalgia were randomized to standard therapy (ST) control or ST with auricular PENFS treatment. METHODS:Participants received weekly visits with a pain practitioner over 4 weeks. The PENFS group received reapplication of PENFS at each weekly visit. Resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fcMRI) data were collected within 2 weeks prior to initiating treatment and 2 weeks following the final treatment. Analysis of rs-fcMRI used a right posterior insula seed. Pain and function were assessed at baseline and at 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: At 12 weeks post-treatment, there was a nonsignificant trend toward improved pain scores and significant improvements in pain interference with sleep among the PENFS treatment group as compared with the ST controls. Neuroimaging data displayed increased connectivity to areas of the cerebellum and executive control networks in the PENFS group as compared with the ST control group following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend toward improved pain and function among veterans with fibromyalgia in the ST + PENFS group as compared with the ST control group. Pain and functional outcomes correlated with altered rs-fcMRI network connectivity. Neuroimaging results differed between groups, suggesting an alternative underlying mechanism for PENFS analgesia. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine 2020.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alternative Therapies; Chronic Pain; Fibromyalgia; Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS); Rehabilitation Medicine
Authors: Venkatagiri Krishnamurthy; Kaundinya Gopinath; Gregory S Brown; Benjamin M Hampstead Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Seth A Eisen; Han K Kang; Frances M Murphy; Melvin S Blanchard; Domenic J Reda; William G Henderson; Rosemary Toomey; Leila W Jackson; Renee Alpern; Becky J Parks; Nancy Klimas; Coleen Hall; Hon S Pak; Joyce Hunter; Joel Karlinsky; Michael J Battistone; Michael J Lyons Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-06-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Ignacio Cifre; Carolina Sitges; Daniel Fraiman; Miguel Ángel Muñoz; Pablo Balenzuela; Ana González-Roldán; Mercedes Martínez-Jauand; Niels Birbaumer; Dante R Chialvo; Pedro Montoya Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2011-12-30 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Venkatagiri Krishnamurthy; Lisa C Krishnamurthy; Dina M Schwam; Ashley Ealey; Jaemin Shin; Daphne Greenberg; Robin D Morris Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2018-03
Authors: Frederick Wolfe; Daniel J Clauw; Mary-Ann Fitzcharles; Don L Goldenberg; Winfried Häuser; Robert L Katz; Philip J Mease; Anthony S Russell; Irwin Jon Russell; Brian Walitt Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Chester C Buckenmaier; Kevin T Galloway; Rosemary C Polomano; Mary McDuffie; Nancy Kwon; Rollin M Gallagher Journal: Pain Med Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Noah A Zucker; Alex Tsodikov; Scott D Mist; Stephen Cina; Vitaly Napadow; Richard E Harris Journal: Pain Med Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Anna Woodbury; Lisa C Krishnamurthy; Anastasia Bohsali; Venkatagiri Krishnamurthy; Jeremy L Smith; Melat Gebre; Kari Tyler; Mark Vernon; Bruce Crosson; Jerry P Kalangara; Vitaly Napadow; Jason W Allen; Daniel Harper Journal: Neurobiol Pain Date: 2022-05-17