Literature DB >> 33162094

Invited review: Lying time and the welfare of dairy cows.

Cassandra B Tucker1, Margit Bak Jensen2, Anne Marie de Passillé3, Laura Hänninen4, Jeffrey Rushen3.   

Abstract

Adequate time lying down is often considered an important aspect of dairy cow welfare. We examine what is known about cows' motivation to lie down and the consequences for health and other indicators of biological function when this behavior is thwarted. We review the environmental and animal-based factors that affect lying time in the context of animal welfare. Our objective is to review the research into the time that dairy cows spend lying down and to critically examine the evidence for the link with animal welfare. Cows can be highly motivated to lie down. They show rebound lying behavior after periods of forced standing and will sacrifice other activities, such as feeding, to lie down for an adequate amount of time. They will work, by pushing levers or weighted gates, to lie down and show possible indicators of frustration when lying behavior is thwarted. Some evidence suggests that risk of lameness is increased in environments that provide unfavorable conditions for cows to lie down and where cows are forced to stand. Lameness itself can result in longer lying times, whereas mastitis reduces it. Cow-based factors such as reproductive status, age, and milk production influence lying time, but the welfare implications of these differences are unknown. Lower lying times are reported in pasture-based systems, dry lots, and bedded packs (9 h/d) compared with tiestalls and freestalls (10 to 12 h/d) in cross-farm research. Unfavorable conditions, including too few lying stalls for the number of cows, hard or wet lying surfaces, inadequate bedding, stalls that are too small or poorly designed, heat, and rain all reduce lying time. Time constraints, such as feeding or milking, can influence lying time. However, more information is needed about the implications of mediating factors such as the effect of the standing surface (concrete, pasture, or other surfaces) and cow behavior while standing (e.g., being restrained, walking, grazing) to understand the effect of low lying times on animal welfare. Many factors contribute to the difficulty of finding a valid threshold for daily lying time to use in the assessment of animal welfare. Although higher lying times often correspond with cow comfort, and lower lying times are seen in unfavorable conditions, exceptions occur, namely when cows lie down for longer because of disease or when they spend more time standing because of estrus or parturition, or to engage in other behaviors. In conclusion, lying behavior is important to dairy cattle, but caution and a full understanding of the context and the character of the animals in question is needed before drawing firm conclusions about animal welfare from measures of lying time. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; dairy cow; lying behavior; motivation; standing

Year:  2020        PMID: 33162094     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-18074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  15 in total

1.  Welfare of cattle during transport.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Bernadette Earley; Sandra Edwards; Luigi Faucitano; Sonia Marti; Genaro C Miranda de La Lama; Leonardo Nanni Costa; Peter T Thomsen; Sean Ashe; Lina Mur; Yves Van der Stede; Mette Herskin
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

2.  Time Spent in a Maternity Pen during Winter Influences Cow and Calf Behavior in Pasture-Based Dairy Systems.

Authors:  Fabiola Matamala; Helen Martínez; Claudio Henríquez; Pilar Sepúlveda-Varas
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Optimism and pasture access in dairy cows.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Kirsty Jenkins; Emily J Bethell; Conrad P Ferris; Helen Kabboush; Jennifer Weller; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A Systematic Review on Commercially Available and Validated Sensor Technologies for Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Anna H Stygar; Yaneth Gómez; Greta V Berteselli; Emanuela Dalla Costa; Elisabetta Canali; Jarkko K Niemi; Pol Llonch; Matti Pastell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-03-29

5.  Livestock Informatics Toolkit: A Case Study in Visually Characterizing Complex Behavioral Patterns across Multiple Sensor Platforms, Using Novel Unsupervised Machine Learning and Information Theoretic Approaches.

Authors:  Catherine McVey; Fushing Hsieh; Diego Manriquez; Pablo Pinedo; Kristina Horback
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Dairy Cow Behavior Is Affected by Period, Time of Day and Housing.

Authors:  Lisette M C Leliveld; Elisabetta Riva; Gabriele Mattachini; Alberto Finzi; Daniela Lovarelli; Giorgio Provolo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Effect of a High Welfare Floor and a Concrete Slatted Floor on the Growth Performance, Behavior and Cleanliness of Charolais and Limousin Heifers: A Case Study.

Authors:  Jakob Leskovec; Mojca Voljč; Silvester Žgur
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of indoor living space on dairy cow production, reproduction and behaviour.

Authors:  Jake S Thompson; Christopher D Hudson; Jonathan N Huxley; Jasmeet Kaler; Robert S Robinson; Kathryn J Woad; Nicola Bollard; Jenny Gibbons; Martin J Green
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A Comparison of Rice Husks and Peanut Shells as Bedding Materials on Dairy Cows' Preferences, Behaviour, and Health.

Authors:  Pengtao Li; Amin Cai; Kris Descovich; Tong Fu; Hongxia Lian; Tengyun Gao; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Alteration in Activity Patterns of Cows as a Result of Pain Due to Health Conditions.

Authors:  Eva Mainau; Pol Llonch; Déborah Temple; Laurent Goby; Xavier Manteca
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.