Anne Illemann Christensen1, Cathrine Juel Lau2, Peter Lund Kristensen3, Sisse Buch Johnsen4, Anne Wingstrand5, Karina Friis6, Michael Davidsen1, Anne Helms Andreasen2. 1. National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark. 2. Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark. 3. Intersectoral Cooperation, Region of Southern Denmark, Denmark. 4. Continuity of care and economy, North Denmark Region, Denmark. 5. Data and Development Support, Region Zealand, Denmark. 6. DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
Abstract
Aim: This article aims to describe the study design, including descriptive statistics on changes in response rates, characteristics associated with response and response mode distribution, in the Danish National Health Survey (DNHS) in 2010, 2013 and 2017. Methods: Each survey was based on five regional stratified random samples and one national random sample drawn from the Danish Civil Registration System. The subsamples were mutually exclusive. Around 300,000 individuals (aged ⩾16 years) were invited to participate in each survey using a mixed-mode approach (paper/web). A questionnaire with a minimum of 52 questions was used in all subsamples. In 2010 and 2013, invitations were sent via the regular postal service, whereas a secure electronical mail service was used to invite the majority (around 90%) in 2017. Weights accounted for survey design and non-response. Results: Participation decreased from 59.5% in 2010 to 54.0% in 2013 after which it increased to 58.7% in 2017. The proportion answering the web questionnaire increased from 31.0% to 77.4% between 2013 and 2017 and varied from 73.8% to 79.7% between the subsamples in 2017. Overall, the response rate was low among young men and old women and among individuals who were unmarried, had low sociodemographic status, were from ethnic minority backgrounds or were living in the eastern part of Denmark. Conclusions: The survey mode, response mode distribution as well as response rate have changed over time. Weights to handle non-response can be applied to accommodate possible problems in generalising the results. However, efforts should continuously be made to ensure that response is missing at random.
Aim: This article aims to describe the study design, including descriptive statistics on changes in response rates, characteristics associated with response and response mode distribution, in the Danish National Health Survey (DNHS) in 2010, 2013 and 2017. Methods: Each survey was based on five regional stratified random samples and one national random sample drawn from the Danish Civil Registration System. The subsamples were mutually exclusive. Around 300,000 individuals (aged ⩾16 years) were invited to participate in each survey using a mixed-mode approach (paper/web). A questionnaire with a minimum of 52 questions was used in all subsamples. In 2010 and 2013, invitations were sent via the regular postal service, whereas a secure electronical mail service was used to invite the majority (around 90%) in 2017. Weights accounted for survey design and non-response. Results: Participation decreased from 59.5% in 2010 to 54.0% in 2013 after which it increased to 58.7% in 2017. The proportion answering the web questionnaire increased from 31.0% to 77.4% between 2013 and 2017 and varied from 73.8% to 79.7% between the subsamples in 2017. Overall, the response rate was low among young men and old women and among individuals who were unmarried, had low sociodemographic status, were from ethnic minority backgrounds or were living in the eastern part of Denmark. Conclusions: The survey mode, response mode distribution as well as response rate have changed over time. Weights to handle non-response can be applied to accommodate possible problems in generalising the results. However, efforts should continuously be made to ensure that response is missing at random.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cross-sectional studies; data collection; health surveillance; health surveys; study design
Authors: Heidi Amalie Rosendahl Jensen; Cathrine Juel Lau; Michael Davidsen; Helene Birgitte Feveile; Anne Illemann Christensen; Ola Ekholm Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Felix Wittström; Nils Skajaa; Kasper Bonnesen; Lars Pedersen; Ola Ekholm; Lisa Strate; Rune Erichsen; Henrik Toft Sørensen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sofie Rath Mortensen; Peter Lund Kristensen; Anders Grøntved; Mathias Ried-Larsen; Cathrine Lau; Søren T Skou Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2022-08
Authors: Kristina Laugesen; Jonas F Ludvigsson; Morten Schmidt; Mika Gissler; Unnur Anna Valdimarsdottir; Astrid Lunde; Henrik Toft Sørensen Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 4.790