| Literature DB >> 33159019 |
Tze Pin Ng1, Yanxia Lu2, Crystal Tze Ying Tan2, Qi Gao1, Xinyi Gwee1, Tamas Fulop3, Anis Larbi2.
Abstract
Human evidence for the role of continuous antigenic stimulation from persistent latent infections in frailty is limited. We conducted a nested case-control study (99 deceased and 43 survivors) of participants aged 55 and above in a longitudinal ageing cohort followed up from 2003 to 2017. Using blood samples and baseline data collected in 2003-2004, we examined the association of pathogenic load (PL) count of seropositivity to 10 microbes (viruses, bacteria and mycoplasma) with cumulated deficit-frailty index (CD-FI) and the physical frailty (PF) phenotype, and mortality. Controlling for age, sex, education, smoking and alcohol histories, high PL (7-9) versus low PL (3-6) was associated with an estimated increase of 0.035 points in the CD-FI (Cohen's D=0.035 / 0.086, or 0.41). High PL was associated with 8.5 times odds of being physically frail (p=0.001), 2.8 times odds of being weak (p=0.010), 3.4 times odds of being slow (p=0.024), and mortality hazard ratio of 1.53 (p=0.046). There were no significant associations for specific pathogens, except marginal associations for Epstein-Barr virus and Chikungunya.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; frailty; immunosenescence; mortality; virus
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33159019 PMCID: PMC7695406 DOI: 10.18632/aging.104076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1Latent infections by pathogens.
Demographic, clinical, physical, cognitive and mental functions, and survival status of study participants by pathogenic load categories.
| Participants, N | 81 | 61 | |
| Male sex | 60.5 (49) | 57.4 (35) | 0.71 |
| Age, years | 71.5 ± 8.0 | 74.5 ± 8.6 | 0.036 |
| Less than 7 years of education | 70.4 (57) | 68.9 (42) | 0.84 |
| Current smoker | 6.2 (5) | 14.8 (9) | 0.16 |
| Daily alcohol drinker | 3.7 (3) | 4.9 (3) | 0.72 |
| Living alone | 46.9 (38) | 54.1 (33) | 0.40 |
| No. of medical illnesses | 2.69 ± 1.59 | 3.03 ± 1.89 | 0.24 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.3 ± 4.1 | 23.2 ± 5.1 | 0.93 |
| CRP, mg/L, median (IQR | 0.287 (0.103 – 0.775) | 0.502 (0.186 –0. 826) | 0.099† |
| CD-FI Frailty Index | 0.240 ± 0.074 | 0.286 ± 0.095 | 0.001 |
| Robust (0) | 40.7 (33) | 19.7 (12) | |
| Pre-frail (1-2) | 53.1 (43) | 55.7 (34) | |
| Frail (3-5) | 6.2 (5) | 24.6 (15) | 0.001 |
| Weakness | 29.6 (24) | 57.4 (35) | 0.001 |
| Slowness | 8.6 (7) | 23.0 (14) | 0.017 |
| Exhaustion | 11.1 (9) | 23.0 (14) | 0.058 |
| Inactivity | 33.3 (27) | 36.1 (22) | 0.735 |
| Shrinking | 13.9 (11) | 16.4 (10) | 0.685 |
| Deaths | 62.5 (50) | 81.7 (49) | 0.014 |
Figures shown are % (N) or Mean ± SD
P values from t-test of significance for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables
† Non-parametric significance test (Mann-Whitney U)
Estimated effects of pathogenic load on frailty and mortality outcomes.
| Frailty Index (0-1) | 0 (reference) | 0.046 (0.018, 0.074) | 0.001 | 0 (Reference) | 0.035 (0.007, 0.063) | 0.015 | |
| Prefrail (vs Robust) | 1 (reference) | 2.17 (0.98, 4.84) | 0.057 | 1 (reference) | 1.86 (0.77, 4.49) | 0.166 | |
| Frail (vs Robust) | 1 (reference) | 8.25 (2.46, 27.6) | 0.001 | 1 (reference) | 8.54 (2.32, 31.5) | 0.001 | |
| Weakness | 1 (reference) | 3.08 (1.53, 6.20) | 0.002 | 1 (Reference) | 2.84 (1.28, 6.28) | 0.010 | |
| Slowness | 1 (reference) | 3.15 (1.18, 8.37) | 0.022 | 1 (Reference) | 3.40 (1.17, 9.87) | 0.024 | |
| Exhaustion | 1 (reference) | 2.43 (0.97, 6.08) | 0.057 | 1 (Reference) | 2.45 (0.91, 6.62) | 0.076 | |
| Inactivity | 1 (reference) | 1.13 (0.56, 2.27) | 0.735 | 1 (Reference) | 1.19 (0.57, 2.46) | 0.647 | |
| Shrinking | 1 (reference) | 1.21 (0.48, 3.07) | 0.685 | 1 (Reference) | 0.99 (0.35, 2.77) | 0.985 | |
| Mortality hazard ratio | 1 (reference) | 1.60 (1.08, 2.38) | 0.019 | 1 (Reference) | 1.53 (1.01, 2.31) | 0.046 | |
PL: pathogenic load
Figures shown are estimates of group mean differences in Frailty Index, or odds ratios of physical frailty and its components, and mortality hazard ratio, and their (95% confidence intervals).
Adjusted for sex, age, education, smoking and alcohol history
Figure 2Cumulative survival by pathogenic load category.